It absolutely means something
That the NBA in that era was EXTREMELY competitive
And just because Richmond wasn't an all-star yet doesn't mean that he wasn't the Rookie of the Year averaging 22 a game in '89
Plus, like I said, their coach is in the hall of fame as well.
There's no shame in losing to a team with 2 HOFs & a HOF coach, PERIOD.
LOL at big-upping the '89 Warriors. The very next season they added Tim Hardaway and STILL went just 37-45 and missed the playoffs. They were a bunch of no-defense shooters who never did jack shyt in the playoffs. Mullin and Richmond were borderline HOFers at best, mostly just due to ppg totals, and Richmond was a fukking rookie.
Breh, this is legit a useless discussion. Just flattening out every HOF player as the same, every year of their career as the same, and ignoring the entire rest of their supporting cast is beyond silly. That's not a useful discussion, it's just forum game playing.
* Warriors were a damn 7-seed. Is 2-seed Utah supposed to be better than them or not?
* Malone was supposed to be the GOAT power forward and 3rd in MVP voting. Is he better than Chris Mullin making his first all-star appearance or not?
* Stockton was supposed to be one of the GOAT point guards, 2nd-team All-NBA, 2nd-team All-Defensive. Is he better than rookie Mitch Richmond who wasn't even going to make an All-Star Team for another 4 years or not?
* The Jazz stars were supported by DPOY and All-Star Mark Eaton, 20ppg scorer Thurl Bailey, former 20ppg scorer Darrell Griffith, and shooter Bob Hansen. The Warriors stars were supported by Manute Bol, Terry Teagle, Rod Higgins, Winston Garland, and Larry Smith. Did the Jazz have an advantage there, or not?
* Bragging about Don Nelson being in the HOF is a laugh. Nelson only won one other playoff series in his 7 years with the Warriors. Both times he won in the first round, he immediately lost 4-1 in the second round. He has never been respected anything like Jerry Sloan and his HOF vote was due to longevity and innovations, not playoff winning.
* Not only was Golden State an underdog in every respect, they beat the Jazz in UTAH twice and then finished the sweep at home.
You're trying to big-up a 7-seed that missed the playoffs the next year and only won 1 playoff series in 7 years. And this wasn't even their good year, this was when Mullin/Richmond were raw and Hardaway wasn't even on the team yet. They had no business even being competitive in the playoffs, much less sweeping a 2-seed.
Stop star counting and look at the actual team.