Imagine thinking you had a point with this dumb ass shyt.
MJ, Duncan, and KD all played and won in systems that had motion-offense principles.
How the hell are you going to bring up Duncan to layer your point when he played in a team that literally sacrificed individualism and high-volume stats for the betterment of the team for his entire career? Did you conveniently forget the identity of the Spurs over the last two decades? How the hell are you going to bring up KD when Kerr's system/coaching not only beat him, not only enticed him to join (he spoke about how GS'
strength in numbers was what drew him in), but helped him win - where did KD's
isolating and scoring get him before he went to the Warriors?
And to think that KD's
isolating and scoring is the reason why they won with him is further proof that y'all don't know shyt about the game. If you seriously think the Warriors won simply because KD was ISO'ng it up, well, perhaps you need to find a new sport to follow.
What the fukk is up with y'all nikkas and y'all straw man bullshyt?
Kerr's already spoken about how in a condensed setting like the playoffs is where you put the ball in your best players' hands and get them to go to work. Why do you think he's not aware of this? Why do you think that bringing this up proves his point wrong about players needing to adopt better team-orientated habits? Why simplify his argument to this nonsense?
And just as a sidenote: one of the main reasons why the Warriors were on the brink of losing the '18 WCF was
Durant abandoning the system and even admitting he was at fault by trying to ISO too much, which sparked the whole Kerr-Durant / Phil-MJ "trust your teammates" exchange. Funnily enough, when the Warriors started to run the offense through Steph/Klay and get more ball/player movement going in G6/7, that's when they regained control of the series.