No he didn't...
The one year Oscar won a championship he averaged 19/6/7, and was able to assimilate into a more suitable role as a #2 without the pressure of having to score all the points...
O's only triple double season was in Y2 and he was a first round out. Cumulatively he averaged a triple double for his first 6 years in The League, 30.4/10/10.7----->in those six years he did get the Royals to two ECF and the playoffs five times...
Its actually pretty apt that Westbrook is compared directly to Oscar, Russ is at 26/10.3/10 for his last five seasons, and his team has only made it past Rd1 once and likely won't get outta there this year. I have a feeling these two are really similar styles of player but thats the problem I have with how overrated Robertson became, the man himself said he never even heard the term "triple double" until the 80s so he gets a ton of credit in retrospect for something that wasn't even tallied in his era, in lieu of his overall body of work. Triple double shouldn't even be mentioned when it comes to dude, it wasn't an actual thing...
Your team can't win a title with either Oscar Robertson or Russell Westbrook as your best player...