No. It's a good assessment on not to get involved with the circus that is politics.
The opportunity to vote doesn't always give you a democracy. In fact the US govt is skilled in that department.
Leading in, you've given good reasons not to vote for candidates, and is proving the point itself. You give people a reason to vote, people will vote. Obama I consider a great president and candidate (and whom I laid down the votes for), had a record setting turnout. I believe voters declined this election, and for good reason. We either get the snobby, misogynistic, and inexperienced Trump or the snake, corrupt, prejudiced in Clinton. 3rd parties are often inexperienced and don't get screen time to protect the duopoly.
Are these people wrong in not believing in voting for any candidate on the ballot? I think NOT. Why would I vote for Hilary, who paid out the party to punish Sanders (a man I turned out to vote for in primaries), called sections of the black youth super predators, and was broken down into childish insults by her opposite during debates? Why would I vote for Trump who is hostile to minorities, caters to racists, and doesn't believe in protecting the environment?
But to some people there's the requirement to picking the lesser of two evils. I can see that angle, but I don't believe in it if there's nobody to represent what I want or believe in.
I
Kaep for sticking to his belief and exercising his right not to vote if he didn't believe in anyone who ran for the office.