Steph Curry still hasn't beaten an honest Lebron led team even with homecourt advantage #KDSAVEDHISLEGACY

Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
348
Reputation
-75
Daps
592
It doesn't hurt his legacy at all. Where shyt gets warped is where cats misrepresent Steph as a historically better player than LeBron because Steph's team has beaten LeBron's team more...

🤣 what? Most heads picked San Francisco because most heads understand the game isn't 1v1, most people thought they had the better team coming into the series even without a Top 75 player. So that doesn't fly, muhfukkas weren't giving a fukk about no Top 75 shyt when they were predicting the series...
Klay is an obvious top 75 snub:camby:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
49,689
Reputation
19,148
Daps
197,560
Reppin
the ether

WE'RE NOT TALKING
ABOUT WHERE THEY RANKED AS
PLAYERS...
WE'RE TALKING ABOUT
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED
ON THE COURT...

KOBE DIDNT OUTPLAY
CHAUNCEY IN THOSE FINALS,
WADE DIDNT OUTPLAY DUNCAN, ETC

KYRIE DID OUTPLAY STEPH
IN B2B FINALS.
:devil:
:evil:



In all the series I listed, the #2 on one team either outplayed the #1 on the other team, or was close enough that it still would have been an evenly matched series if he had.


Jerry and Wilt performed like the top two players on the court in the '70 Finals and the Lakers still lost
Hayes and Dandridge were the two best players in the '78 Finals and still barely won in 7
Magic/Kareem both outplayed Dr. J in '80 and it was still a tight series
Magic/Worthy arguably both outplayed Isiah in '88
Kobe didn't outplay Chancey in '04, but the Lakers lost so badly that he could have outplayed him and it still would have been an evenly matched series
Pau outplayed Garnett in 2010 and it was still a very even series
There are people who would argue that 2013 Finals Wade played even to 2013 Duncan
Whether Kyrie outplayed Steph in 2016 is an open question, Steph had the greater defensive attention. It was still clearly an even series and ridiculous to claim otherwise.

Bron had to averaged 30-11-9 on good shooting %'s with great defense, and the series still came down to the biggest block in Finals history followed by a tie-breaking 3pt with a minute left. It was CLEARLY an evenly matches series and to claim otherwise is ridiculous.

The Cavs were basically playing with just 5 players who could contribute positively, and three of those were TT, JR, and a 35yo washed RJ. Going up against a 73 win team with three all-stars and you want to claim they had too big an advantage?
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
77,231
Reputation
10,640
Daps
305,975
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Over 90% of players played for multiple teams and every player has lost in the post season before worth mentioning. Classic nitpicking. Curry lost no KD to save him this go round :umad:
Curry won a chip last season remember or that don’t count according to you?

Didn’t Bron miss the playoffs last year too?
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
13,742
Reputation
1,937
Daps
65,481
Reppin
NULL
Y’all need to stop with these ABC arguments. Having the best players has never guaranteed victory look at history :camby:

Also funny people ignoring LeBron being 38 years old in year 20 like that doesn’t matter at all to Curry defenders

Except it is a guaranteed victory because when you remove Durant. Steph has beat LeBron once while LeBron has won three times.

My take on Steph and LeBron has been consistent since 2016.

Bron treated him like his little brother in that series. I saw it then. Steph is a great player. He just cannot beat Bron without a top 75 player next to him (Klay and Wiggins are not it). He needs a legit high level scorer that can go off when Bron/AD/whoever try to double him.

giphy.gif

lebron-james.gif
 
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
348
Reputation
-75
Daps
592
Well yeah he was out there playing by himself…. nobody on the team showed up..
He didn’t have no legendary performance. Bricking clutch shots down the stretch and clear liability on defense. KD had nothing to do wit
Of course they were favorites, but that’s not the point I’m making. The standard shifts when LeBron has an all time great in his prime. It’s now fair. Steph doesn’t have that, so now it’s “even.”
Now we acting like Klay not an all time great and Dray not one of the best defenders/playmakers in the modern era?. Give it up most “experts” had Warriors beating Lakers because of the illusion of Steph having Bron’s number when common sense shows it was all because of KD
 

rbksNgirbauds

Even on the court we stay flyy, Jada & A.I.
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
8,825
Reputation
1,020
Daps
41,708
:mjlol: this is so hilarious. When Lebron has the obviously better team, and they win, it's all Lebron. Ignore what Kyrie did in the series, ignore what AD did in the series. It's just Lebron
Flip that to Curry benefit and it's "bu bu bu bu its not fair to LeBron:damn:"

Dude wasn't the most integral player on his teams success for the majority of the damn series. Cut the shyt. Bron closed it out, but the supporting cast won the series
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
13,742
Reputation
1,937
Daps
65,481
Reppin
NULL
A 73 and 9 team winning a championship season prior needing another All NBA player is atrocious. Imagine 72-10 Bulls needs Shaq after 96

That was always a disengenous take. They excelled and won 73 games because the league never saw anything like Steph or GS. Not because Klay and Dray were superstars. GS was an unorthodox team and people weren't prepared. Once Cleveland figured them out, it was over.
 
Top