I dont make definitive judgements about those players because I didnt see them in their era. You can do research but its not the same thing. Comparing players across eras is hard enough, nevermind the fact one is doing it right now and the other you never even witnessed.
Born in the 90's means you're barely qualified to speak on Kobe and AI, let alone 2 eras prior to that. There's no perspective.
Well I disagree with that. More important than anything is developing a strong knowledge of the game itself which then makes it easy to understand what made players great and how they impacted the game for the better compared to others. In addition to that, I have seen Magic in his era through hours of game footage, with context have taken note of his stastitcal outputs in his greatest seasons and most importantly was willing to lean on the testaments of those who did live in the era to better shape my stance. This isn't an opinion developed overnight, but over a very long period of time. When studying history in general you can definately become well versed on a topic even if you didn't live in the time. Just have to put in the work which again, I've done more than I'd care to admit.
You have plenty of people from older eras who will downplay everything and anything accomplished now because they are impartial to their own time period. If anything perspective can be clouded by personal favorites. I try to keep that out of the equation. I do understand the differences of each era as well.
Also, when I say that I'd take Curry over both doesn't mean I don't clearly understand the argument from there sides as well. When comparing players this great rarely is there not room for discussion so I'm not of the mindset that this is an open & shut case. You are free to choose Magic (& Oscar for that matter) over Curry as peak players. It's the likes of Stockton and Kidd I would take massive issue with however.