Steph being an all time bricklayer in the clutch needs to be discussed.

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
81,115
Reputation
24,824
Daps
366,517
No, it is not. It covers a specific circumstance expected from the elite of the field, to secure a desired result. That is statistically meaningful because the group of people responsible for creating these shots, is innately limited.
Jesus Christ.
Dude. 10 shots doesn’t mean anything. Steph Curry has taken over 2,000 playoff shots.

Two tho…
I’m wasting my time.

Whatever dude. Believe what you want.
 

Shadow King

Quiet N***a Loud Choppa
Supporter
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
42,457
Reputation
3,455
Daps
85,782
Reppin
Hometown of Cherokee at Law
Jesus Christ.
Dude. 10 shots doesn’t mean anything. Steph Curry has taken over 2,000 playoff shots.

Two tho…
I’m wasting my time.

Whatever dude. Believe what you want.
Okay and those 2000 shots don't speak the reliability of the player when asked to take the lead in the last minute of the game, a responsibility tasked to the best players on the court.

The 10 highlighted, do. So, they speak not to his whole career, but an aspect of it that can and will be compared to his peers.

It's not about belief, it's reality.
 

Warren Peace

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
4,307
Reputation
873
Daps
17,917
my warriors fan friends were killing me for pointing out that he's never had a dame like moment in the playoffs

he always bricks
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,731
Daps
203,947
Reppin
the ether
Gotta look at FG%

Bron is tops and I think MJ is #2

Kurry ain't Klutch but for some reason that not clutch thing has never stuck to him like Bron


LeBron getting a reputation for not being clutch was fukking wild. It shows how far the media will take narratives with literally nothing behind them. His first six years in the NBA, he hit more game-winning or game-tying shots (17) than any other player in the league, and at a higher % than most of them too.


And in the playoffs he was even better:



First postseason (to ECSF):

Averaged 36-8-6 on 51% shooting (38% threes) in his very first playoff series ever.

Won 3 of their 4 games by 1 point, hitting game-winners in Game 3 and Game 5

Took the champion Pistons team to 7 in the next round with Iglauskas as his #2.



Second postseason (to Finals):

Goes to his first ECF and puts together a 48 point Game 5 in a must-win game.

Hits the go-ahead and game-tying buckets in the last 30 seconds of regulation of Game 5 and then the game-winner in overtime.

Reaches the Finals with Boobie Gibson as his #2



Third postseason (to ECSF):

Put up a 45-point Game 7 against the 66-win champ Celtics with Iglauskas as his #2.



Fourth postseason (to ECF):

Averaged 39-8-8 in the ECF trying to beat the Magic 1 on 5.

Hit a game-winning 3pt buzzer-beater in Game 2 of the ECF to keep the Cavs alive.

Hit two free throws with 0.5 seconds left in Game 4 to force overtime, then hit a 3pt with 4 seconds left to cut the deficit to 1.



Bron hadn't even turned 25 yet at that point. He'd already been to four postseasons, won 7 series, hit 5 game-tying or game-winning shots in the playoffs plus a game-tying pair of free throws, had multiple classic big games in clutch moments, won as a huge underdog once and pushed championship squads to 7 as a huge underdog twice, and had never once been sent home by anything less than a Finals squad.

How the hell do you build a "not clutch" narrative out of that?
 
Top