This is actually worse than the ‘bUt hE iN dA tOp 10’ comment
Steph being an all time bricklayer in the clutch needs to be discussed.
- Thread starter hood b. goode
- Start date
No smoke for OKC in the WCF blowing a 3-1 lead the same year?Or being the first team in history to blow. a 3-1 lead in the finals after winning 73 games
No. It isn’t.
10 shots doesn’t mean shyt.
If Curry was 10 for 10 it wouldn’t mean shyt.
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
Then make that fukking point from jump.
I still come out here to learn from dudes but yalll get so caught up in hating niqqas.
NBA talks are awful
threattonature
Veteran
I hate that stat because Curry has at least 5 shots under 50 seconds that tied the game which should be defined as clutch too but they want to cherry pick to make Steph look worse. Within the first four minutes of this video you can see at least four of em. He also has numerous hits with the Warriors up 1 or 2 to close out games.
This one is to take the league at like 55 seconds which is why they narrowed it to 50 seconds.
This one is to take the league at like 55 seconds which is why they narrowed it to 50 seconds.
Last edited:
NYC Rebel
...on the otherside of the pond
Mindfield333
Superstar
Having kd afforded him the opportunity to have comfortable leads…Whatever.....Steph just closes teams out well before 50 seconds left
I’ve witnessed it so many games
Just replay last years finals
Curry destroys teams. Warriors are up 6-10 points with a minute + left and Curry is checked out and on the bench during those last 50 seconds resting
Sounds more clutch to me cause he doesn’t even give the opposite team any chance to WITHIN those last seconds
I wouldn't say that, but for that specific scenario 10 shots is enough.
Dude stays posting senseless
It doesn’t.
You guys think 10 shots means anything in the grand picture of Steph’s career? Or even his playoff career? How many playoff shots has Steph taken? Thousands?
The only people who think 10 shots is statistically significant are talking head morons who need to create a narrative. Like the dumb ass whose smiley you posted.
Y’all need to take a math class.
We are talking about a very specific aspect of his (playoff) career. This specific category doesn't feature many individuals taking 10 or more shots, so yes, it's statistically significant because his volume is equal to his peers in the same field.
I don't need to take anything but a winning lotto ticket.
The very fact that it’s a specific shot attempt in a specific, highly limited circumstance spread across several years makes it statistically meaningless.
Saysumthinfunnymike
VOTE!!!
They have an unhealthy obsession with Dame. Because he's a point guard in the West that often shoots 30-footers. It's the most basic dummy posting on here.
No, it is not. It covers a specific circumstance expected from the elite of the field, to secure a desired result. That is statistically meaningful because the group of people responsible for creating these shots, is innately limited.
According to Curry fanatics I’m sure
