Virgin 18-22 thx bye
Virgin 18-22 thx bye
I'm 28
it's over.
Honestly bro look at it like this
Id rather date a pornstar than ur average chickenhead.
U know why?
Atleast a pornstar is confident and self assured for the most part (some of them).They cant lie on their p*ssy either. If u ask her # shed tell u or u can see for urself. She could be a realy good person but shes just a whore. Atleast shes being real. If ur self assured and can handle that, and dont mind sharing more power to u. If u dont want to then that doesnt make u "insecure" its just knowing wat u can handle. I know an older couple who swing and are happy as hell, married 30+ years and there both hoes by definition but atleast there honest and there happy.
Ur average hoe? Sleeps around then lies or omits when u ask. Gets defensive and brings up double standards, calls u insecure etc. maybe get a simp or two to cosign. Makes a fake number. Why u ask? Cuz shes ashamed of it. If she was so confident shed tell u the number but even shes insecure about it cuz she knows its wrong. So not only is she a hoe but shes a liar. What makes u think she wont lie and say the kid is urs, or oh my phone died, or oh hes just a friend.
Theres levels to hoes. Ive met some hoes who are really good people. Usually the most honest ones. The ones who lie and end up married always have their hoeness revealed sooner or later, adding another # to the divorce statistics. Women see this hoe get married & think they can do the same thing cuz good girls are getting the same results as hoes. Its fukked up outchea.Kinda like good guys see fukkboys get results and do the same thing which i do myself
I usually rock with you, but I can't cosign this.Y'all are obsessed with what women are doing
Worry about the ONE chick you can get.
nikkas wanna play the field and fukk a harem of bytches day and out UNTIL "their" ready to settle.
Then its Virgin Vicky they want. Have a seat dweebs.
That study is bullshyt. Some women can wait till marriage get that ding dong for the first time and then cheat later on bc she only had "that D" and wants to "experiment".
Stop getting ya blood pressure high over things you can't change. A hoe gonna cheat she gone cheat. Watch her smoke or move along.
Nowhere does it say or imply that.Wrong, a study is not a good study if the study contradicts itself.
Women with more partners were more likely to be marriage material than those with 1 in 1980 and 1990. That right there means the study is null.
You read that wrong.In 2010 It said a chick with 1 partner has a 22% chance of divorce compared to an 18% chance for 10+ bodies.
Y'all keep thinking these inexperienced premature thots are the answers
Lol at settling down with 18-25 year ol female
Good luck trying to keep her away from dikkk during her prime sexual years
That's like telling prime LeBron that he can't start and has to come off the bench[/QUOTE]
No because lebron can start but only on the team he has a contract with
What you want is for LeBron to be under contract with the cavaliers but occasionaly suit up for other teams if he feels like it
Nowhere does it say or imply that.
Are you sure you parsed those graphs correctly?
But you said 1 partner was less wifeable than multi.ummmm, yes it does.
the apex for both the 80s and 90s is at 2 partners and declines from there.
Heck, even the 2000s second highest peak is at 2 partners before declining up until more than 10 partners.
But there are a number of possible explanations which don't damage the initial premise.
For example, it's possible that due to social mores 10+ women were far less comfortable reporting their # back in the 80's, hence skewing the results.
Or, maybe women of that time felt like having experienced 10+ was more than enough and were far more reticent to divorce.
Like you said, the parameters would have to be expanded in order to capture those nuances, but that by no means invalidates the study altogether.
damn, thats real.
even women with 3-4 bodies carry baggage from past dudes.. imagine if you multiply that number by 6... she ends up becoming a nut case.
I feel you.
I'm done arguing with dudes about this. You ain't changing a simp's mind, so why bother If they want to marry a slut, then let them. There are so many things that oppose their thought process. Religion says a high number of partners leads to soul ties, which is an absolute no go. Statistics says a high number of partners leads to decreased ability to pair bond and have a stable marriage. From a medical perspective, having all those sexual partners increases your likelihood of AIDS, HPV and other nasty diseases. There's even theories floating around based on experiments with insects and small animals that the females retain small fragments of DNA of the males she's procreated with and pass them onto their eventual children....lending credence to the religious argument of soul ties if this is ever proven in human trials....also the gross realization that a chick has all her partners DNA inside her and your kid will too. Generally, people with higher amounts of sexual partners have poor decision making and are more impulsive. Less likely to be faithful. Will find it hard to find happiness with one man especially if they've slept with better or been with better throughtout their life (even though said person never married them....they'll still fantasize). Then there's the former hoes who got ran through and are only after a stable relationship with you now because they're getting older and can no longer hang with younger women in terms of getting the men they want, so you're really playing yourself being the guy she decides she'll settle for. There are just so many reasons. Don't listen to these simps. Don't even argue with them These nikkas know in their heart they wouldn't want their daughters growing up to be Draya nor would they bring a hoe like that to their grandmom's house for after church dinner. They're just here to argue and cause confusion.
I'm done arguing with dudes about this. You ain't changing a simp's mind, so why bother