Spygate: The untold story by Bryan O'Leary

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-290
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
All three of their SB wins were close so couldn't one easily say they were a play or two away from losing all three of them. They were a dropped pass and a missed FG away from not even making the SB last year.


BTW since when do we equate dominance with teams that don't win it all. Guess the Bills were dominant in the 90s. Eagles were dominant last decade right?

I just get annoyed by certain teams and players getting to wear the "winner" label despite evidence to the contrary. Any other team would be regarded as "chokers who couldn't get it done in the big moment in the big game" but since its the Pats :leon: "They were THAT close" :beli:
:what: They won 3/5 SBs. That's choking huh.
 

PremierDaTruth

Oh well.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
2,649
Reputation
-980
Daps
4,764
If any of you guys actually believe this then I recommend buying the National Enquirer, they have some great stuff in there too.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,528
Reputation
4,838
Daps
68,279
So, the cheating scandal was not that bad because the team remained good even after the scandal was revealed.

Let's say somebody in college is cheating and is getting 95's on his tests. If, after he is caught cheating, he gets 90's instead of 95's, does that make cheating less wrong? Because, that student would have been expelled before he got a chance to prove otherwise.

You're an idiot if you thought this was a proper analogy. I signed back in just to let you know that.

Don't ask for an explanation because I won't be giving one. All right, good look in your future endeavors. :birdman:
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-290
Daps
8,732
Reppin
NULL
Can you show me where I used the word "Exposed"?

:laff: at more dominant since Spygate. Denial is a muthfukka ain't it? :pachaha: Something tells me that you wouldn't be giving an 18-1 team that lost in the SB props if it wasn't the Pats. The shifting that has gone on is amazing. All of a sudden its' not about winning it all. All of a sudden close losses/wins don't count the same. :snoop:

they haven't been more dominant since spygate?
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,480
Reputation
10,618
Daps
231,253
If any of you guys actually believe this then I recommend buying the National Enquirer, they have some great stuff in there too.


Congrats on tearing the writer down.

The problem is that the commissioner left Spygate very open ended rushing to crush all evidence.

It invites all sorts of how it went down ideas to stay in existence.
 

Listen

Tell me moar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,665
Reputation
1,477
Daps
22,830
Reppin
A few Floors Down from the Daily Grind
:beli: could never be more appropriate

Just because I don't think anyone bothered to read that post:

NASD Regulation Hearing Panel Expels Premier Capital Management and Fines and Suspends Firm President and Broker for Stock Touting and Fraudulent Advertising - FINRA

Washington, DC—NASD Regulation, Inc., today announced that an NASD Regulation Hearing Panel expelled Premier Capital Management, Inc., Dallas, TX, for placing materially misleading advertisements in national publications to tout Continental Investment Corporation (OTCBB:CICGQ), failing to disclose compensation received from Continental, and other violations. The firm’s president and owner, Bryan James O’Leary, was suspended for 325 days and fined $62,500, while Ryan Mark Reynolds, a former registered representative, was suspended for 720 days and fined $155,000. In addition, O’Leary and Reynolds were ordered to buy back shares from, or to make restitution to, customers who purchased Continental stock based on one of Premier’s advertisements. O’Leary and Reynolds were also ordered to re-qualify and prove payment was made to customers prior to associating with a member firm. If they seek to re-enter the industry, they will be subject to pre-use filing requirements for future proposed advertisements and other communications with the public.



The Hearing Panel found that O’Leary and Reynolds had placed a materially misleading eight-page insert advertisement touting Continental in the September 1997 issue of Mutual Funds Magazine. The advertisement, which purported to be a research report, was distributed to more than 625,000 individuals. In addition, single-page advertisements, which described Continental as "A Stock Whose Time Has Come," and invited readers to contact Premier for a copy of "our research report," appeared in issues of Town & Country, Individual Investor, Estates Internationale, and Leading Estates of the World. Continental is a Dallas, TX corporation, which owned a large parcel of land near Atlanta, GA, which it believed had a possible future as a waste management facility.



The Hearing Panel found that the advertisement contained in Mutual Funds Magazine failed to provide an accurate and balanced picture of the risks and benefits of the investment, projected returns without a reasonable basis, and contained exaggerated claims. The following were among the fraudulent statements contained in the advertisement:

"nless Bill Gates or the Japanese dig a Grand Canyonesque hole 9 miles from downtown Atlanta, the value of [Continental’s] property has no place to go but up."
"Even if 99% of all stocks are dragged down with the overall market, in our opinion, [Continental] will be an extremely profitable exception."
"[W]e expect to see a tremendous upside ‘run’ in [Continental’s] stock price all the way up to, at least, the mid-fifties."
"Continental presents a ‘textbook case’ ... wherein a small company holding an insurmountable strategic advantage can potentially achieve complete predominance over significantly larger competitors."

In addition, the Hearing Panel found that Premier, O’Leary, and Reynolds failed to disclose the compensation they received from Continental for touting its stock. Premier received more than $200,000 to cover the costs it incurred for printing and publishing the research report and the single-page advertisements. The Panel also found that Reynolds received 10,000 shares of Continental stock, then worth over $200,000, as compensation for Reynolds’s services on behalf of Continental. Premier and O’Leary also failed to file the report with the Association’s Advertising Regulation Department.


The dude who wrote this book is a fraud.
 

ChocolateGiddyUp

Superstar
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
17,202
Reputation
2,062
Daps
43,674
Reppin
Chicago
I didn't hear about it the Brady thing with the radio frequency.

Congrats for you hearing it first. :manny:

Thats the point you mental midget:snoop:

If it was true we all would have heard about it in 2007 ESPN woulda had a 2 hr special about it

We wouldn't be hearing about it now frm some unknown cac 5 years later selling his cheap ass book for 9.99 on Amazon
 

PremierDaTruth

Oh well.
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
2,649
Reputation
-980
Daps
4,764
Congrats on tearing the writer down.

The problem is that the commissioner left Spygate very open ended rushing to crush all evidence.

It invites all sorts of how it went down ideas to stay in existence.

And you would probably believe anything as long as it affected the Patriots in a negative way.
 

Listen

Tell me moar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
8,665
Reputation
1,477
Daps
22,830
Reppin
A few Floors Down from the Daily Grind
Congrats on tearing the writer down.

The problem is that the commissioner left Spygate very open ended rushing to crush all evidence.

It invites all sorts of how it went down ideas to stay in existence.

And all Obama has to do is present his long form birth certificate and all the questions would go away.

:sitdown:
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,480
Reputation
10,618
Daps
231,253
And you would probably believe anything as long as it affected the Patriots in a negative way.


Of course I would, because YOU said so.

fukk you.

I just passed it on from a beat writer I personally know, not even in NY.
 

NYC Rebel

...on the otherside of the pond
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
68,480
Reputation
10,618
Daps
231,253
And all Obama has to do is present his long form birth certificate and all the questions would go away.

:sitdown:


Don't fall back on that. Obama presented evidence and zealots didn't care.

The difference with Spygate is the commissioner DESTROYED all the evidence.

I'll repeat this showing your lapse in logic.

the commissioner DESTROYED all the evidence.

So it falls back to what I said:

The problem is that the commissioner left Spygate very open ended rushing to crush all evidence.

It invites all sorts of how it went down ideas to stay in existence.

I have to wonder why you even bother to post that shytty Obama analogy when it doesn't disspell my point.
 
Top