I wouldn't say Jay has a bad discography, but I do believe people are more lenient with his bad albums than they are with Nas' bad albums and I don't get it. Yeah, I'm bringing up Nas because this is a spin-off of a thread about him.
LIke
@Inspect Her Deck saying that Nas' discography is twice as bad and I'm just like.......really? I don't know where all these horrible albums are. It goes back to what I said in a previous thread where people only look at albums in two ways: Classic or trash. If you can't play something front to back or some of the songs are forgettable, then the album isn't worth listening to.
Let me put it this way: I don't think Kingdom Come is a good album. I don't think The Blueprint 3 is a good album. But they're not worth throwing away in my opinion. Kingdom Come has the first couple tracks on it that are bangers, BP3 has the first couple tracks on it and "A Star is Born," along with some songs that everybody hates but I like ("Venus vs. Mars," "Reminder"). So I wouldn't throw either of them away. They're just not highlights in Jay's career.
And with Nas, it's the same thing. Street's Disciple is all over the place as an album, especially in the second half, but the good tracks help keep me from throwing it away. The only Nas album I don't think is worth keeping around is Nasir. I think you can get rid of it and it won't impact his discography at all. With Jay, you can get rid of MCHG and it will make his discography better, especially since his albums post-retirement have been shaky except for two (American Gangster, 4:44).
The last thing I'll say is that Jay is a great sequencer. He knew that making Kingdom Come and BP3 top heavy at least helps the quality. You can stop playing the albums at the halfway point and you'll be okay. You don't even need the second half, so you'll come away with a good/classic EP at least.