SPIN: JESUS IS THE MOST WELL KNOWN MUSLIM OTHER THAN MUHAMMAD (S.A.W)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Broke Wave]

@Broke Waveis a serious troll.

This dude quotes the Bible recklessly reaching anywhere to make a case for Islam.


One of the worst posters I have seen on this board. Truly horrible at putting facts together.

He claims Christianity and the Bile are false but somehow uses quotes from the same books to make his points

Pointing out the obvious contradictions in the bible to prove that it's false is what every non christian does

Christians

Co-sign This guy in another thread tried to tell me that Shia Muslims were not really Muslims... According to this guys definition they are though.

I already said this to you... Only Sunni Muslims are actually Muslims... explaining this is long and drawn out but if you google it there is plenty of research on this subject.

 

[KeysT]

BISMILLAHIR RAHMNIR RAHEEM. JESUS (PEACE BE UPON HIM) WAS A MUSLIM BECAUSE HE PRACTICED SUBMISSION TO GOD. A MUSLIM IS SIMPLY SOMEONE WHO PRACTICES SUBMISSION TO GOD. EVERY SINGLE PROPHET WAS A MUSLIM BY THE WAY.

I already said this to you... Only Sunni Muslims are actually Muslims... explaining this is long and drawn out but if you google it there is plenty of research on this subject.

You guys are confused.

 

[Bondye Vodou]

I already said this to you... Only Sunni Muslims are actually Muslims... explaining this is long and drawn out but if you google it there is plenty of research on this subject.

b-b-but shia muslims sumbit to God. How could they not be muslim?

Or does this "submission to God" argument only work when it time to fool people into thinking Jesus was a muslim

 

[Broke Wave]

b-b-but shia muslims sumbit to God. How could they not be muslim?

Or does this "submission to God" argument only work when it time to fool people into thinking Jesus was a muslim

They don't submit to the one true monotheistic god.

 

[Mr swag]

Why these muzzies refuse to answer Muhammad fukking little 9 year old

There is even records of Hindus calling this dude a clown

 

[intilectual recipricol]

We all still sittin here actin like "jesus" actually existed?

 

[Chris.B]

We all still sittin here actin like "jesus" actually existed?

No we just try to base dates of him.

AD/BC.

Come up with your own calender fool :obama3:
That way you can really ignore his existence

 

[intilectual recipricol]

No we just try to base dates of him.

AD/BC.

Come up with you won calender fool :obama3:
That way you can really ignore his existence

Thats all you got?

Looks like someone needs to research...

When did they start using BC & AD?
Do people use BCE/CE?
Does the Hindu calendar use BC/AD?

and we still actin like "jesus" existed? There's no historical evidence for that shyt... none. Of course outside of religious comic books.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

and we still actin like "jesus" existed? There's no historical evidence for that shyt... none. Of course outside of religious comic books.

You are wrong.....



Your argument is null and void.​

 

[Chris.B]

Thats all you got?

Looks like someone needs to research...

When did they start using BC & AD?
Do people use BCE/CE?
Does the Hindu calendar use BC/AD?

and we still actin like "jesus" existed? There's no historical evidence for that shyt... none. Of course outside of religious comic books.

Would that mean every date in the western world has been wrong in over 2000 years?

That would be one heck of a big error

 

[intilectual recipricol]

Would that mean every date in the western world has been wrong in over 2000 years?

That would be one heck of a big error

No, BC/AD are simply points to start, they have ZERO significance. Thats why we can use BCE (before common era) and CE (common era) and it doesnt make a difference.

Again, there is no, I repeat, NO evidence that "jesus" ever existed outside of myth books.

No record of crucifixion...
No record of corpses coming out of their graves and dancing in the streets...
No record of the sun standing still...
No record of a man able to feed multitudes with a couple fishes and loaves...
No record of a man coming back to life after being stapled to sticks...

NO HISTORIAN OF THE TIME MENTIONS THIS SH!T AT ALL... for a guys supposedly running around where literate people are doing all these miracles that if they were written down in books that the earth could not contain them; it sure seems like THE people who recorded history at the time missed everything.

Except of course in a religious comic book that started to be written several decades after this "person" supposedly lived. Liken that to a UFO landing in Manhattan at 1PM on Wednesday May 15th 2013, and no one decides to write about it until 2073. You'd find that odd right?

Again, we're still acting like "jesus" existed?

 

[Chris.B]

No, BC/AD are simply points to start, they have ZERO significance.

That would mean the start of the calender year is wrong then?

Since Jesus never "existed".????

 

[intilectual recipricol]

You are wrong.....

Did Jesus Exist? - YouTube

Your argument is null and void.​

Bart Ehrman believing "jesus" existed means "jesus" existed? We are privy to the same information. Did you not even listen to the shyt you posted? He did not provide any evidence for "jesus", he compared it to Abraham Lincoln (we have writings of Abe), he compared it to the Holocaust (we have concentration camps and graves and 1st hand sources), we have ancient records of Julius Ceasar, he admitted we have none for "jesus" outside of biblical comic books.

Youre better than this.

 

[intilectual recipricol]

That would mean the start of the calender year is wrong then?

Since Jesus never "existed".????

No, we can start the calendar year where ever we want. You think time didnt exist before they started using BC/AD? Your argument is terrible at best.

According to the wiki page and its sources AD wasnt widely used until the year 800. You think they didnt keep time before that?

You need to realize how silly this argument really is. Not everyone even uses this calendar. Think lil homey, the Chinese New Year is different from ours...

 

[Chris.B]

No, we can start the calendar year where ever we want. You think time didnt exist before they started using BC/AD? Your argument is terrible at best.

According to the wiki page and its sources AD wasnt widely used until the year 800. You think they didnt keep time before that?

You need to realize how silly this argument really is. Not everyone even uses this calendar. Think lil homey, the Chinese New Year is different from ours...

Well now that we know Jesus is a "fraud". Wouldn't it be wise to move away from it? and use something more accurate?

Don't you think we are doing society a huge disservice by basing time on a "fictional character"?