IllmaticDelta
Veteran
Werent chillen like that and not chilling at all are two different meanings. AGAIN, the bronx is dense as fukk. We are talking about the 70s, no internet to connect us all. What one person experienced in soundview is different than what another person experienced in Kingsbridge. Thats why there's so much back and forth
HipHop was a youth/early 20s movement, and the gang movement of the early 1970s was comprised of these same age ranges. Once you understand that, it will make perfect sense as to why there weren't masses of latinos in early HipHip from the foundational years of 1970-1974. The two groups were enemies
But you guys are just going all out to discredit Latinos and call us culture vultures. There's a thin line between 71-75 and 75-79 and the radical FBAs are putting they best effort to decide when hip hop was born according to when they think the first latino stepped In.
The difference between 1970-1974 and 1975-later, is that HipHop was fully formed before Latinos started entering from 1975 and later. Ricans picked up bboying from the black pioneers first in 1975 and as blacks left bboying to gravitate to the more musical aspects, Ricans were mainly involved in bboying.
"We think ya came in at 73 so let's just say hip hop was born in 71 and ya all culture vultures " gtfoh
No one knows who the fukk the first is of anything, like crazy legs said no one was documenting shyt back then because they were all teenagers not giving a fukk or high on drugs. Hip hop was a CULTURE and a movement. Blacks and Latinos built that culture together whether they knew each other or not
Crazy Legs didn't witness HipHop of any kind, until 1976, his opinion is irrelevant