really most countries dont have a mix imo. what they have is a mix of public and private sector. socialism is only when workers are in control, not the government, that said the countries that make basic needs public sector are way better off
Elizabeth Warren is a "capitalist to her bones" gave 45 a standing O just for capitalismIf Bernie is a democratic socialist, then could Warren be considered a market socialist?
Market socialism - Wikipedia
People need in no particular order...
1) Security
2) Shelter
3) Health care
4) Education...
Any government official who tells me that "the country can't afford it" is DAMN liar...
really most countries dont have a mix imo. what they have is a mix of public and private sector. socialism is only when workers are in control, not the government, that said the countries that make basic needs public sector are way better off
Thread almost a decade olddead link in op's post.... neg train pending....
i know pressure, i know... it was a playful statement... .Thread almost a decade old
Pointless debate when folks fail to acknowledge the real world failures we see in socialism.A worthwhile thread to start up again, as long as the shills actually have to engage with the issues inherent in capitalism.
Socialism is ideal - worker ownership over the means of production, the maintenance of the commons for everyone, the development of technology for the aid of humanity, etc
Pointless debate period.Pointless debate when folks fail to acknowledge the real world failures we see in socialism.
Empire-building and colonialism won.Pointless debate period.
Capitalism won long ago...
Whatever makes you comfortableEmpire-building and colonialism won.
And we're seeing that unravel now.
Whatever makes you comfortable
The second sentence i believe grossly underestimates the resiliency of the systems currently in place.