So we all agree the 2016 election is already a foregone conclusion right?

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,751
I don't think it's set in stone - 2016 is still a ways away.

Hillary probably has it if she wants it, but that's an if. For one, she's getting to be a bit on the older side for a presidential candidate, and there's always the possibility that she'll have some health issue in the next few years. Assuming she actually runs, she'll probably win the primary (and the election).

Christie...meh. He's gonna have a hard time getting the hardcore tea party types to support him. The GOP base tends to see him as a moderate (even though he really isn't). He'll be seen as Mitt Romney part II and might not make it past the primaries. Plus, to keep it 100, I think the weight issue might work against him.
You underestimating Hillary Clinton's ambition and vainglory? :comeon: She will run...no don't about it.

Regarding Christie, again, he doesn't even need those teabagger types to win the primary. He can lose every single southern state except Florida and still win the primary fairly easily. His primary map victory will look like an overlap of a Democrat's general map victory.
 

Odyssey

Banned
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
608
Reputation
-330
Daps
251
Reppin
NULL
LOL This is why the GOP is going to lose in 2016.


I would never want to be associated with the neocon, debt creating, foreign interventionist crony capitalist clowns in the GOP. I hope they lose, they deserve it.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,424
Reputation
3,888
Daps
107,798
Reppin
Detroit
LOL This is why the GOP is going to lose in 2016.

Well, if Hillary runs in 2016, the sexism emanating from the right will be :wow:.



Kind of like how the 'cism went into overdrive with Obama. Only difference is that unlike black people (who are only 13-14% or so of the US population), females are 50%+. Republicans will inevitably piss off female voters and lose the election (easily) as a result.
 

DStyles

Vegan
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
8,740
Reputation
-4,100
Daps
9,537
Reppin
Brooklyn,NY/Manchester,UK
t1larg.jon.huntsman.june24jpg


Jon Huntsman 2016 :win:
 

Momentum

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
25,830
Reputation
856
Daps
60,085
Reppin
NULL
Dawg Obama fukked the country up

He doesnt even speak to the black Congressional caucus

And black people are in way worse shape now than before he got elected

I just want whoever is best qualified and aligned in my interests... I dont give a fukk what race they are.
Politics is a zero sums game for minorities. Ya'll aren't getting this yet?
:snoop:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,389
You underestimating Hillary Clinton's ambition and vainglory? :comeon: She will run...no don't about it.

Regarding Christie, again, he doesn't even need those teabagger types to win the primary. He can lose every single southern state except Florida and still win the primary fairly easily. His primary map victory will look like an overlap of a Democrat's general map victory.

Damn the great books. What was the longest standing empire in history? Egypt. Did they have female rulers? Yes. Compare that to the few hundred years that Rome had traction or the decade Greece had so on and so on.... Them white boys were wrong.
 

Morph

Rookie
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
338
Reputation
0
Daps
279
Reppin
NULL
Latinos consistently vote Democrat historically and their support for Dems is growing, not waning. They voted over 2/3rds Dem the last two cycles. Stop making shyt up.
The last two cycles isn't indicative of a historical trend, it's indicative of a recent trend.

Also, if Latinos were so enamored with liberalism, why didn't they vote against Prop 8 in California?
  • Latinos supported Bush over Gore
  • Latinos supported Bush over Kerry
  • Lots of latinos voted for Ted Cruz in the South Valley
  • Bush's Latino base grew in 2004
  • George P. is 'biracial' and from Texas with roots in FL
  • Latinos in Texas and Florida love the Bush family
I have lived both in FL and TX and can tell you these latinos aren't crazy about democrats or the liberal platform (gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research using cells from the fetus, etc). I live in SoCal now, and most of my latino neighbors disagreed with Obama's support for gay marriage. Most are unhappy that he put that before immigration reform.




Once the boomers die out in 15-25 years, it's really over. Millenniums will not be as forgiving for the lost generation....
I don't think Millennials are happy with either party though.
 

Odyssey

Banned
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
608
Reputation
-330
Daps
251
Reppin
NULL
Why single whyte wommenz vote for big daddy govt.

1. As PA states, women have an inborn disposition toward nurturance, and the pity is strong in them. I think women get off a little on feeling pity and sympathy for others, and feeling needed by the less fortunate. This is why so many women flock to work in the human despair services fields, like nursing or teaching. Married women also have this nurturance instinct, but it is redirected to their own families, which turns their moral focus inward to the center ring of the concentric rings of genetic distance and moral regard. This in effect makes them more GOP friendly (and more sane from a societal perspective), and we see this reflected in the polls.

2. As Whiskey states (well, speaking on the record, as *I* originally stated), single women’s prime directive is to fulfill their hypergamous impulse for the highest possible status man they can coax into long-term commitment. The party that is perceived as being pro-unrestricted female sexuality, anti-male sexuality, and anti-drone beta male is going to get their vote. You would probably not be surprised to learn that not only do single white SWPL chicks just automatically ASSUME everyone in their social circle is an Obama cultist (yours truly gets a pass because CHARMING b*stard), the first thing that pops in their heads when you ask them why they’re voting for Obama is usually something along the lines of “Romney wants to take away my birth control”. Yeah, these are educated women saying this. Thanks suffrage!

The fact is, marriage advocacy (and earlier marriage) is bad for young women’s sexual market value leverage, (but good for older married women’s SMV leverage who, it should be noted, were the original pro-monogamy constituents and advocates). A party that embodies the single and seeking alpha cock in the city lifestyle will appeal to them. The party which is perceived (facts don’t really matter in politics) as pushing women to settle down early with a reliable company man and start popping out future video gamers is anathema to the single, economically self-sufficient, white woman sensibility.

3. Finally, and perhaps most saliently, single white women see Big Daddy State as a beta provider husband substitute. This has nothing to do with pity for the downtrodden masses and everything to do with “how much money and services I can redirect my way with an assist from the white knight contingent”. The single white woman who delays family formation finds herself battling her ancient subterranean limbic rhythms which always and everywhere guide her to seek out potential mates who could provide resources for her and her children, particularly when she is burdened by pregnancy and mostly unable (at least as would have been the case in the ancestral environment) to fully provide for herself. The single white woman, lacking the beta provider hubby (ironically, mostly by her own hand) seeks to fill his absence with the alternative — the looming Big Man tribal leader, which in modern America is the federal government, and its shaman is Obama. Women are naturally redistributionist because women are naturally self-aggrandizing and self-entitled, as befits their higher reproductive worth. And, more controversially, a very bad man like myself would say that women are naturally comfortable in quasi-harem arrangements, which is what the single woman concubine-government alpha provider relationship amounts to. And just like an alpha provider/protector, the government is very good at forcibly extracting tribute from the beta male masses.

On this last factor, the American growth industry of single moms is certainly pushing the country in a more redistributionist direction, because no demographic outside of blacks, gays and Hispanics is more generally and reliably pro-government handout than the single mom with kids to feed and no dad around to help out.


steve_sailer_obama_romney_october_2012b.png

- Roissey
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,751
The last two cycles isn't indicative of a historical trend, it's indicative of a recent trend.

Also, if Latinos were so enamored with liberalism, why didn't they vote against Prop 8 in California?
  • Latinos supported Bush over Gore
  • Latinos supported Bush over Kerry
  • Lots of latinos voted for Ted Cruz in the South Valley
  • Bush's Latino base grew in 2004
  • George P. is 'biracial' and from Texas with roots in FL
  • Latinos in Texas and Florida love the Bush family
I have lived both in FL and TX and can tell you these latinos aren't crazy about democrats or the liberal platform (gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research using cells from the fetus, etc). I live in SoCal now, and most of my latino neighbors disagreed with Obama's support for gay marriage. Most are unhappy that he put that before immigration reform.





I don't think Millennials are happy with either party though.
:snoop: You have no clue whatsoever what you're talking about. Hispanics did not support Bush over Gore or Kerry. Hispanics have voted majority Democrat in every single presidential election since they became a statistically significant voting bloc in 1960. I think every single presidential cycle in their existence would probably qualify as a historical trend. :heh: And they just went 75% Dem last time.

http://www.hispanicvista.com/hvc/Opinion/Guest_Columns/102504schmal.htm

This was one of the dumbest posts I've read here in a long time.
 
Last edited:

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,012
Daps
132,751
Why single whyte wommenz vote for big daddy govt.

1. As PA states, women have an inborn disposition toward nurturance, and the pity is strong in them. I think women get off a little on feeling pity and sympathy for others, and feeling needed by the less fortunate. This is why so many women flock to work in the human despair services fields, like nursing or teaching. Married women also have this nurturance instinct, but it is redirected to their own families, which turns their moral focus inward to the center ring of the concentric rings of genetic distance and moral regard. This in effect makes them more GOP friendly (and more sane from a societal perspective), and we see this reflected in the polls.

2. As Whiskey states (well, speaking on the record, as *I* originally stated), single women’s prime directive is to fulfill their hypergamous impulse for the highest possible status man they can coax into long-term commitment. The party that is perceived as being pro-unrestricted female sexuality, anti-male sexuality, and anti-drone beta male is going to get their vote. You would probably not be surprised to learn that not only do single white SWPL chicks just automatically ASSUME everyone in their social circle is an Obama cultist (yours truly gets a pass because CHARMING b*stard), the first thing that pops in their heads when you ask them why they’re voting for Obama is usually something along the lines of “Romney wants to take away my birth control”. Yeah, these are educated women saying this. Thanks suffrage!

The fact is, marriage advocacy (and earlier marriage) is bad for young women’s sexual market value leverage, (but good for older married women’s SMV leverage who, it should be noted, were the original pro-monogamy constituents and advocates). A party that embodies the single and seeking alpha cock in the city lifestyle will appeal to them. The party which is perceived (facts don’t really matter in politics) as pushing women to settle down early with a reliable company man and start popping out future video gamers is anathema to the single, economically self-sufficient, white woman sensibility.

3. Finally, and perhaps most saliently, single white women see Big Daddy State as a beta provider husband substitute. This has nothing to do with pity for the downtrodden masses and everything to do with “how much money and services I can redirect my way with an assist from the white knight contingent”. The single white woman who delays family formation finds herself battling her ancient subterranean limbic rhythms which always and everywhere guide her to seek out potential mates who could provide resources for her and her children, particularly when she is burdened by pregnancy and mostly unable (at least as would have been the case in the ancestral environment) to fully provide for herself. The single white woman, lacking the beta provider hubby (ironically, mostly by her own hand) seeks to fill his absence with the alternative — the looming Big Man tribal leader, which in modern America is the federal government, and its shaman is Obama. Women are naturally redistributionist because women are naturally self-aggrandizing and self-entitled, as befits their higher reproductive worth. And, more controversially, a very bad man like myself would say that women are naturally comfortable in quasi-harem arrangements, which is what the single woman concubine-government alpha provider relationship amounts to. And just like an alpha provider/protector, the government is very good at forcibly extracting tribute from the beta male masses.

On this last factor, the American growth industry of single moms is certainly pushing the country in a more redistributionist direction, because no demographic outside of blacks, gays and Hispanics is more generally and reliably pro-government handout than the single mom with kids to feed and no dad around to help out.


steve_sailer_obama_romney_october_2012b.png

- Roissey
The only thing drier than your failed attempts at humor is your dikk.
 

CASHAPP

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
26,389
Reputation
-2,494
Daps
48,118
:what:You a nas fan?You let that nikka down with this post:beli:.

I warned you that I did not mean to be crass buddy :beli:

@Morph thank you. We never learn. Its pretty sad in 20 years, Obama was the first "outsider" to the White House. People are too obsessed with these "dynasties". They be the same people to call Clinton a better President for Black people than Obama just because of the economy and fail to mention being the biggest slave master of the drug war.
 

yoyoyo1

huh?
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,402
Reputation
-3,174
Daps
15,120
if Hillary doesn't run under that feminist bullshyt all these abrasive careerwomen represent, it'll be ok
 
Top