Again, this sounds great. But unfortunately it isn't 100% accurate. Islam allowed enslavement under 2 conditions: prisoners of war and birth. So your illusions of an active slave trade is just that, an illusion.
While slavery was obviously not exactly like capitalism (or I guess it would have been called capitalism), there are still plenty of similarities. It's not me who is in denial about slavery, but rather you who is denial about capitalism.
Once again, you are avoiding my point. I'm not defending capitalism, and I never said Islam had an "active" slade trade, but the fact remains that, as historians have shown, the Islamic world maintained slave populations from its inception through to modern times.
I'll list the same questions individually, and you can tell me whether or not these are true in the West, and maybe also whether you think it is ok for a society to do these things:
Can an employer legally force his employee to become his sex slave in our capitalist society?
Does a man need his employer's permission to get married, as a slave needs his master's permission to get married in the Quran?
When a man has a child here, does that child automatically belong to his employer as a slave's child belongs to the slave's master in the Quran?
When a man is killed by his employer here, does the employer get a reduced sentence because the dead man was a "slave" the way a slavemaster gets a reduced punishment for killing a slave in the Quran?
Is an employee here not permitted to possess or inherit property, or conduct independent business, because they are employed, the way a slave is prohibited from those things in the Quran?
Can an employee here be sold by his employer to another employer with no say in the matter, as is the case for a slave in the Quran?