Angel On The Rag
I'm bloody hungry!!
FreedS[ohh]lave;386354 said:Wheres Lebrons Shaq?
having bosh and wade > having shaquille
so kobe has 12 games in offs where he scored over 40..and bron got eleven 40pt games
- Thread starter Malcolmxxx_23
- Start date
having bosh and wade > having shaquille
-{J03c00L}-
MITCH DID IT!
FreedS[ohh]lave
Banned
Angel On The Rag
I'm bloody hungry!!
yeah o'neal was the goat center for a lil but but having two all stars is more important
Bron's performance last year was comparable to Kobe's first Finals performance. No Bron didnt' have the great overtime period like Kobe did but that's pretty much all Kobe did during that series because he was hurt and even missed a game and yet his team still managed to win rather easily in 6. Bron's never been on a team that could win with him playing anything less than great and with the exception of last year even him playing great wasn't enough.
Angel On The Rag
I'm bloody hungry!!
true
Kobe was injured that first finals, and still had a classic close out performance in game 4.
Lebron just sucked
Lebron just sucked
threattonature
Veteran
Heres the funny thing...If Bron on had let's say 4 40 pt games and won a couple titles while playing like a fraction of himself he would be worshipped. If they had won last year, like they very well could have, with him playing the exact same way somehow people would have found a way to make it different. Somehow it would have been spun into a great all around performance because he doesn't need to score to make his team win or some bullshyt like that. It's not about logic, it's not about judging players on their own merit...it's about the narrative. It's understandable with the media because they get paid for that shyt but for regular every day nikkas to regurgitate that bullshyt (when it's convenient of course) is.
What kind of dumb shyt is this? Yeah if your team wins then nobody cares about you playing an all around game. But when your team is going down in flames and yet you still play hot potato with the basketball then of course you'll get criticized.
STAN JONES
Fire John Harbaugh
I hope your jokingAnd all the criticism he recieved last year was perfectly valid. I have never defended last year. That's not what has happened throughout his whole career though. He's played well enough to win a title or multiple titles throughout his career he just hasn't been in the right situations. Titles are more so about good fortune than how well an individual plays.
SwagKingKong
All Star
Stop it breh, don't make me neg you even more than you've been negged. No sane nikka would choose Bosh and Wade over a prime Shaq, get the fukk outta here with that bullshyt.
Angel On The Rag
I'm bloody hungry!!
i want to be negged though, it's the reason why i stay in red
i still stand by my statementshaq through 2000 - 2003 > but otherwise what I said was true
G-Zeus
G-Zeus Chrystler...the brehsident
1, its pretty even.
2.. against 50-win teams
were talkinbout what.. 6-8teams top? there fore few matches only... heck one migh have 3 times the numbers of matches compared to the others..
threattonature
Veteran
Yeah but you used last year as an example. When your team wins then why criticize how somebody played. But when your team loses then yeah people will search for what could've been differently. And if a superstar player is playing tentative late in the game then that will be the first thing pointed out.
But yeah it is some bullshyt that if Lebron at this point passes for a game winner it still somehow means he's afraid of the big moment. Meanwhile if it's a Durant or Kobe or Melo the narrative is that they used their pedigree as a closer to set up their teammates. In that regard Lebron definitely gets shyt on coverage wise.
Even if he wins a title I don't think he'll get full credit unless he hits a game winner somewhere in the middle of it.