so if Jesus is "GOD"

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,161
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
16,947
*Tells poster that posting smilies doesn't mean anything, while posting smilies in his response*

Sorry, just had to point that out. :cottonmouthlaugh:

Or in other words


:mjlol: Posting smilies without directly addressing what the other poster is saying does not mean anything. And just like every other post of mine to his, I responded to all that he said. Cacs tell a breh what to call the Most High, and how to worship Him, and they think they hold truth. Another breh comes and says "Hey maybe we should do it as close as we can to how the ancient Israelites did it since even the Son came and did it that way" and he cant drag a rebuttal out of anyone...

But a ":ufdup: You're wrong and brainwashed" rebuttal covers all that up right? :sas2:
 

Lamar Givens

Spitting truth you can’t handle
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
3,327
Reputation
162
Daps
9,936
Reppin
Yeshua
*Tells poster that posting smilies doesn't mean anything, while posting smilies in his response*

Sorry, just had to point that out. :cottonmouthlaugh:

That's what this dude @Everythingg fails to realize. He is so ingrained in his position that he can't even see where he defeats his own arguments by his own contradicting statements.

All of this verified history concerning the Torah as well as the New Testament, but he claims he has this hidden knowledge about the name of the Most High. :mjlol:

Jesus said that there will be those that hate him, and reject him without a cause; @Everythingg is DEMONSTRATING that very well. :umad:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,161
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
16,947
That's what this dude @Everythingg fails to realize. He is so ingrained in his position that he can't even see where he defeats his own arguments by his own contradicting statements.

Its only contradicting when yall do the cac christian thing and take sentences out of context. Posting smilies as you're doing AGAIN, without addressing what was said does not mean anything. You cant keep up,so this is what you do...

All of this verified history concerning the Torah as well as the New Testament, but he claims he has this hidden knowledge about the name of the Most High. :mjlol:


Jesus said that there will be those that hate him, and reject him without a cause; @Everythingg is DEMONSTRATING that very well. :umad:

Who cares if I hate a slave ship? :mjlol:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,875
Reputation
8,179
Daps
121,987
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Everythingg said:
What? :mjlol:

You doing everything except addressing what I said. Again, the date of December 25 was being celebrated as a PAGAN holiday

:sas1:............What holiday and by who?

This date was not connected with the birth of Tammuz. Tammuz's death and descent into the underworld was commemorated during the summer solstice (nowhere near December 25), and there is scant evidence for any commemoration of the god's return; whether or not there are any references to the 'resurrection' (not 'rebirth'), of Tammuz, is a matter of scholarly dispute.

~Prosic, 'The development and symbolism of Passover until 70 CE', p. 84 (2004)

Saturnalia wasn't on December 25, it was typically celebrated on December 17, sometimes from December 14 to 17, and even when it was later extended to a week it still ended on December 23, not December 25.

~Versnel, 'Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion: Transition and reversal in myth', p. 165 (1993)

The earliest reference found to Mithras being born on December 25, is in the anti-Catholic work of Paul Jablonski, an 18th century Protestant attempting to argue that the Catholic Church had become paganized, and that the date of Christmas was simply a heretical adoption of a pagan festivity, specifically the celebration of the birth of Mithras.

~Paul Ernest Jablonski, 'De origine festi nativitatis Christi', in te Water (ed.), 'Pavli Ernesti Iablonskii Opuscula', volume 3, p. 317 (1809)

Current scholarship typically dismisses the idea that identification of December 25 as the date of Jesus' birth was predicated on adoption, co-option, or replacement of pagan equinox festivities such as those for 'Sol Invictus', especially given the lack of evidence for such a pagan festival on this date prior to the Christian fixation on December 25 as the birth of Jesus.

Compounding this is the fact that during the very time that December 25 was adopted widely by the Church as the date of Jesus' birth, the key dates for festive activities in celebration of Sol were in October and August, not December.

~Roll, 'Toward the Origins of Christmas', p. 107 (1995)

Your evidence is lacking.............:sas2:

 
Last edited:

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
13,901
Reputation
10,313
Daps
71,990
Reppin
Wakanda
Its only contradicting when yall do the cac christian thing and take sentences out of context. Posting smilies as you're doing AGAIN, without addressing what was said does not mean anything. You cant keep up,so this is what you do.

I'm out. No sense arguing with a person who doesn't realize I've destroyed their argument. :cottonmouthlaugh:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,161
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
16,947
2. No matter your ducking, the point is there is no reason to believe he "legitimately" came up with the date when people were celebrating their pagan holidays on or around that date BEFORE he "legitimately" came up with the date.

:sas1:............What holiday and by who?









Your evidence is lacking.............:sas2:


You gonna answer or keep playing duck duck goose? :sas1:
 

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,161
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
16,947
I'm out. No sense arguing with a person who doesn't realize I've destroyed their argument. :cottonmouthlaugh:

I had arguments about the name of "Jesus", blacks being the descendants of Israelites, Jeremiah 8:8 saying that the SCRIBES (i.e. those who are the reason we have the bible today) handled the instruction falsely, and all you're on is smilies

:mjlol:

Even though I explained it in the original post as posting smilies WITHOUT responding, thats still all you can be on. Must not have substance to your faith breh :sas2:

I tried to help man. But yall stuck on what the cac tells you to get off it and come to it as it was for your ancestors (assuming yall are black)... :yeshrug: My win and your loss I guess
 

Ill Lou Malnati

Be Well.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
27,597
Reputation
2,772
Daps
68,559
he+is+his+own+son.jpg
Some shyt straight out of an X-Men comic book. :pachaha:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,875
Reputation
8,179
Daps
121,987
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Everythingg said:
You gonna answer or keep playing duck duck goose? :sas1:

Reading is fundamental.....

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/22345093/

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited said:
That 'criticism' has as much validity as claiming that Christians' day of worship is due to pagan influence simply because all the days of the week were named after pagan gods BEFORE the establishment of the religion.

Only person ducking....is YOU.

:sas2:
 
Last edited:

Everythingg

King-Over-Kingz
Joined
Nov 21, 2013
Messages
9,161
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
16,947
The question was, why should I believe he "legitimately" and "honestly" came up with the date of December 25th when people were celebrating paganism on or around that date before he "legitimately" and "honestly" came up with the date of December 25th? You dont have an answer because there is NOTHING you can point to as a legitimate proof of that being his birthday...

Not to mention the other things about the celebration like decorating trees or exchanging gifts.. :mjlol: If you want to pagan it out, then do so. But dont try to fake the funk with those of us who WONT :sas2:
 
Top