So hhh & Stephanie vs kurt and ronda at mania

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,229
Reputation
13,187
Daps
92,603
Reppin
CHICAGO
And they’ll go over too. Just watch.


yup,....

just the fact, this company does not realize kurt angle and raw da rousey on paper completely dwarf the son-in-law and his no talent emasculation heavy based wife.

that if they go over,..
we will be right back in the phoney ass place we were in when the son-in-law went over brock.
which lead to brock being buried via perception and having to sacrifice the undertaker's streak to create convincability for brock, after the relaunch.
ohh well,..
i was wondering how cripple ache and his breast to far separated from one another wife were gonna bury kurt again.
looks like we are approaching what could be the package deal to bury kurt and raw da rousey as well.

oh well,..here is to the mania power one-sies suit entrance of steph.
flanked by her more elaborate but emasculated husband's better than everyone at mania entrance as well.

hhhmania39.gif

FastIdealBackswimmer-max-1mb.gif

descarga.gif

tumblr_o53cy6Fqek1u1ljrzo3_540.gif

22WORmS.gif

Summerslam-2014-stephanie-mcmahon-38510380-480-270.gif

tumblr_o53cy6Fqek1u1ljrzo6_540.gif

hfYextj.gif


giphy.gif

art barr
 
Last edited:

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
41,576
Reputation
5,871
Daps
164,333
Reppin
Dallas, TX
yup,....

just the fact, this company does not realize kurt angle and raw da rousey on paper completely dwarf the son-in-law and his no talent emasculation heavy based wife.

that if they go over,..
we will be right back in the phoney ass place we were in when the son-in-law went over brock.
which lead to brock being buried via perception and having to sacrifice the undertaker's streak to create convincability for brock, after the relaunch.
ohh well,..
i was wondering how cripple ache and his breast to far separated from one another wife were gonna bury kurt again.
looks like we are approaching what could be the package deal to bury kurt and raw da rousey as well.

oh well,..here is to the mania power one-sies suit entrance of steph.
flanked by her more elaborate but emasculated husband's better than everyone at mania entrance as well.

hhhmania39.gif

FastIdealBackswimmer-max-1mb.gif

descarga.gif

tumblr_o53cy6Fqek1u1ljrzo3_540.gif

22WORmS.gif

Summerslam-2014-stephanie-mcmahon-38510380-480-270.gif

tumblr_o53cy6Fqek1u1ljrzo6_540.gif

hfYextj.gif


giphy.gif

art barr
Triple H had nothing to do with Undertaker's streak ending, the real storyline was that Lesnar is the one person Taker could never beat. It's been going on since 2002, and if Taker didn't want to lose he wouldn't have lost.
 

Art Barr

INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,229
Reputation
13,187
Daps
92,603
Reppin
CHICAGO
Triple H had nothing to do with Undertaker's streak ending, the real storyline was that Lesnar is the one person Taker could never beat. It's been going on since 2002, and if Taker didn't want to lose he wouldn't have lost.


no,...
brock had to be relaunched because he was initially buried via cripple ache, and he was relaunched using the taker streak.

if cripple ache never beats brock in his initial comeback to suck all the convincability out of the new relaunched brock from his first hiatus.
we never have to see taker get beat by brock and taker's streak is still intact.

the only way to relaunch brock was to have him end the streak.
which was the only fail safe feather in the wwe's cap left.
you can not have a convincable, used to be real shoot style athlete get beat in his first encounter and then continually lose to the top wwe booked brass and talent.

then, think he looks like a monster without relaunching him with a formidable win against a legacy opponent.

this has always been the wwe way.
launch a monster via the defeat of a past wwe legacy great.

example:

superstar billy graham gets squashed by bad news allen.

brock squashes hogan and rock.

hogan beats sheik

the wwe always has done this.
you should check and learn the series and styles of matches they employ.
this has been an old one used for a long time in the wwe.


art barr
 

Da King

Veteran
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,543
Reputation
1,325
Daps
211,380
no,...
brock had to be relaunched because he was initially buried via cripple ache, and he was relaunched using the taker streak.

if cripple ache never beats brock in his initial comeback to suck all the convincability out of the new relaunched brock from his first hiatus.
we never have to see taker get beat by brock and taker's streak is still intact.

the only way to relaunch brock was to have him end the streak.
which was the only fail safe feather in the wwe's cap left.
you can not have a convincable, used to be real shoot style athlete get beat in his first encounter and then continually lose to the top wwe booked brass and talent.

then, think he looks like a monster without relaunching him with a formidable win against a legacy opponent.

this has always been the wwe way.
launch a monster via the defeat of a past wwe legacy great.

example:

superstar billy graham gets squashed by bad news allen.

brock squashes hogan and rock.

hogan beats sheik

the wwe always has done this.
you should check and learn the series and styles of matches they employ.
this has been an old one used for a long time in the wwe.


art barr

Kang deserved to go over Brock, clean, because he was simply more over
 

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
41,576
Reputation
5,871
Daps
164,333
Reppin
Dallas, TX
no,...
brock had to be relaunched because he was initially buried via cripple ache, and he was relaunched using the taker streak.

if cripple ache never beats brock in his initial comeback to suck all the convincability out of the new relaunched brock from his first hiatus.
we never have to see taker get beat by brock and taker's streak is still intact.

the only way to relaunch brock was to have him end the streak.
which was the only fail safe feather in the wwe's cap left.
you can not have a convincable, used to be real shoot style athlete get beat in his first encounter and then continually lose to the top wwe booked brass and talent.

then, think he looks like a monster without relaunching him with a formidable win against a legacy opponent.

this has always been the wwe way.
launch a monster via the defeat of a past wwe legacy great.

example:

superstar billy graham gets squashed by bad news allen.

brock squashes hogan and rock.

hogan beats sheik

the wwe always has done this.
you should check and learn the series and styles of matches they employ.
this has been an old one used for a long time in the wwe.


art barr
It's about their history not HHH.
 

TobiOT

Veteran
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
31,335
Reputation
3,323
Daps
78,083
Reppin
East London
When Kurt put Kang in the ankle lock....HHH made sure not to tap out :dead: I know it was a confrontation but the heel who is in the submission usually taps out regardless....

other than that, this match is gonna be a :flabbynsick::FlabbyConte: fest
 
Top