So hhh & Stephanie vs kurt and ronda at mania

CM_Burns

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,982
Reputation
-154
Daps
32,545
Reppin
NULL
If they keep it to 15-20 min it could be fun. Last time had me cracking up on some throwback Russo Jerry Springer type booking.
 

gdatruth

Superstar
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
18,744
Reputation
2,445
Daps
26,583
:francis: what a mania

I canceled by WWE subscrtiption with plans to renew for Wrestlamania weekend after last night not so sure.


Roman vs Brock – meh

Rousey/Kurt vs HHH/Steph – hell no. HHH was on the reasons I stopped watching wrestling back in the day

Asuka vs Bliss – should be Sasha imo

Nok vs AJ – only match I’m looking forward to
 

Chris Cool

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,064
Reputation
7,091
Daps
109,507
Reppin
So Cal
They used that 5v5 match to make sure to setup 3 options for HHH at Mania:mjlol:


But honestly, I was ready for HHH to take up a spot at Mania, it’s Stephanie who I have more of a problem with.
That's the stupidest shyt to me. It's supposedly to help make her mainstream.

:mindblown: bytch been on TV for 20 years.
 

Rayzah

I'm Everywhere you ain't never there
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,109
Reputation
915
Daps
22,551
Seriously what did y’all realistically want to happen at mania? Iwc are the only people that don’t like hhh. He always gets loud pops When he comes out, of course he is going to keep having matches. To be honest him, cena and reigns have all had good matches over the years. And none of them are holding anyone back. But let y’all tell it the they are burying the entire roster
 
Last edited:

Rell84shots

Veteran
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
41,576
Reputation
5,871
Daps
164,335
Reppin
Dallas, TX
That's the stupidest shyt to me. It's supposedly to help make her mainstream.

:mindblown: bytch been on TV for 20 years.
Stephanie is envious of Shane because she hasn't had a memorable moment like he has. People can say what they want about Shane, but the fact is he's done more for the company than Stephanie.
 

Scholar

Superstar
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
8,939
Reputation
795
Daps
24,344
Throw the bag at Punk and give the people what they want :blessed:
 

gdatruth

Superstar
Joined
Sep 19, 2015
Messages
18,744
Reputation
2,445
Daps
26,583
WWE is really doing everything they can for me to dislike the current product.

I am pretty neutral on Rhonda. I know why they signed her but I cant stand anything involving HHH & Steph. Now they gonna try to run back Stone Cold vs Vince with Rhonda & Steph. But Rhonda aint Steve and Steph seems to put herself over way more than Vince. Vince was willing to take his fair share of Ls. How many Ls has Steph taken? How many times has she put her hands on male talent and not had her comeuppance. How many times has she made herself the center of the storyline? Why is she more associated with the women’s revolution and the women wrestlers themselves.

I’ve read reporting that the USA network wants more McMahnaaons because they are good for business. Isnt that telling of the current WWE product that the company has a hard time building stars and McManhans always have to be involved.

Lets see how good this is for business?
 

DANJ!

Superstar
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
8,480
Reputation
4,002
Daps
27,614
Reppin
Baltimore
WWE is really doing everything they can for me to dislike the current product.

I am pretty neutral on Rhonda. I know why they signed her but I cant stand anything involving HHH & Steph. Now they gonna try to run back Stone Cold vs Vince with Rhonda & Steph. But Rhonda aint Steve and Steph seems to put herself over way more than Vince. Vince was willing to take his fair share of Ls. How many Ls has Steph taken? How many times has she put her hands on male talent and not had her comeuppance. How many times has she made herself the center of the storyline? Why is she more associated with the women’s revolution and the women wrestlers themselves.

I’ve read reporting that the USA network wants more McMahnaaons because they are good for business. Isnt that telling of the current WWE product that the company has a hard time building stars and McManhans always have to be involved.

Lets see how good this is for business?

The problem with Steph not getting her comeuppance is because truth be told, we're in a soft-ass era of society. Even more than it was 15 years or so ago when people were being PC, but WWE could have a male talent put hands on Steph and everybody (except for the PTC/Bob Costas types) understood it was just entertainment. Now you got parents getting in their feelings when heels don't wave to their kids, people getting all tight about characters or promos being 'offensive', etc. Everybody hurts, and because of social media, everybody has an outlet to say how much it hurts them. If shyt was like this during Attitude, you would've never seen Stephanie in the Walls of Jericho, getting Rock Bottomed, getting Stunned, or getting Pedigree'd. And that's why today, we don't see any dudes getting moves in on Steph... or any male-on-female violence on WWE TV.

But I say all that to say this... they shouldn't have gone down that road with Stephanie's character because even though it builds her "Mrs. McMahon" character as a mean bytch that mistreats her employees, the only person who could fight back on TV without peoples' soft ass feelings getting hurt is another woman. In some ways, I think it'll help Ronda get over for being able to beat up someone who's been literally untouchable. If they intend to have it become an Austin/Vince-esque thing, we'll probably be seeing Stephanie get hers way more often than we're used to.
 
Last edited:

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,794
Reputation
975
Daps
106,199
Seriously what did y’all realistically want to happen at mania? Iwc are the only people that don’t like hhh.
How about some storylines that make sense, interesting builds and more matches people want to see, that too much to ask? IWC are the only people that make excuses for years of bad writing in their favorite shows.
 
Top