So David Stern WENT IN on Jim Rome today? :heh:

A.R.$

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 3, 2012
Messages
8,178
Reputation
640
Daps
21,000
I can't believe so many people on here are on Stern's nuts. I don't even like Jim Rome like that, but it was nothing wrong with the question he asked. It was a softball question. Rome wasn't going to grill him about the league owning the team. All Stern had to say is it is crazy for people to believe the league would fix the lotto. That would of been the end of the story.
The reason this is not a unfair question is a lot of people believe that the lottery is fixed. After the lottery there was a poll at found that the majority of the people who watched the lotto thought it was fixed.
Y'all get too caught up on he "went in", or he's a g. The only thing Stern did is bring more attention to this issue. It was a dumb move. Nobody would of been talking about this interview, or this issue if Stern answered the question like a normal human being. This bring attention back on the league owning the Hornets, and how they blocked The Lakers trade for Paul.
And Rome wins big. His ratings are going to be sky high tomorrow and the rest of the week because of this. Also Rome said he didn't think the lottery was fixed weeks ago, so Stern really went off for no reason.
 

focusloco

All Star
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
2,084
Reputation
715
Daps
8,999
Reppin
NORTH LAS VEGAS
fukk jim rome....he is the biggest sellout in the history of talk radio. And anybody that followed his career will tell you that shyt....he been had this beatdown coming
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,331
Reputation
8,651
Daps
201,619
Reppin
NULL
I can't believe so many people on here are on Stern's nuts. I don't even like Jim Rome like that, but it was nothing wrong with the question he asked. It was a softball question. Rome wasn't going to grill him about the league owning the team. All Stern had to say is it is crazy for people to believe the league would fix the lotto. That would of been the end of the story.

Stern said no. And went over how regardless of the results people would claim the fix was in.

And this isn't the first time he's been asked the question, and it's not the first time he's responded with the :stopitslime: No. People have been calling the lotto fixed since the first one in 85 when they did the drawing live.

And yes, Rome would've went into the NBA owning the team and other shyt regarding the lottery, he wasn't just gonna change topics after Stern said no. Regardless of Stern's answer, the story was gonna be Rome grills Stern about the lottery.
 

phillycavsfan

WAHOOWA
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
22,661
Reputation
1,612
Daps
44,767
Reppin
Philadelphia
I can't believe so many people on here are on Stern's nuts. I don't even like Jim Rome like that, but it was nothing wrong with the question he asked. It was a softball question. Rome wasn't going to grill him about the league owning the team. All Stern had to say is it is crazy for people to believe the league would fix the lotto. That would of been the end of the story.
The reason this is not a unfair question is a lot of people believe that the lottery is fixed. After the lottery there was a poll at found that the majority of the people who watched the lotto thought it was fixed.
Y'all get too caught up on he "went in", or he's a g. The only thing Stern did is bring more attention to this issue. It was a dumb move. Nobody would of been talking about this interview, or this issue if Stern answered the question like a normal human being. This bring attention back on the league owning the Hornets, and how they blocked The Lakers trade for Paul.
And Rome wins big. His ratings are going to be sky high tomorrow and the rest of the week because of this. Also Rome said he didn't think the lottery was fixed weeks ago, so Stern really went off for no reason.

You don't ask a question about a serious issue like rigging a draft like that simply because "people are talking". Rigging a draft could force Stern out of his job and the NBA into a serious crisis. You need actual evidence to back up a big question like that. That's how journalists get their asses handed to them by athletes/coaches/GM's. Not only do you make a fool of yourself in the public eye, but it trivializes a potentially serious issue when Stern's able to swat it away with such ease.

Nobody's talking about the Hornets or the Lakers trade (Seriously, the only people who still care about the CP blocked trade are Laker fans). It was a dumb question; Stern was never going to answer it, and Rome got what was coming to him for framing it in such an unprofessional manner.
 

phillycavsfan

WAHOOWA
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
22,661
Reputation
1,612
Daps
44,767
Reppin
Philadelphia
so school me, wise one.

since when does the burden of proof fall on the individual alleged of something?

It's supposed to be a rhetorical question. Besides, Rome doesn't want to waste time talking to the NBA commissioner during the NBA Finals about how he never beat his wife. It would send the interview off the rails and immediately make it a joke.
 

ecnirp1

mr. open source
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
485
Reputation
355
Daps
885
no one in here mentioned anything about a rhetorical question, it was about how Rome would look guilty either way that he answered the Stern's question.

you're trying to change the argument.
 

jwinfield

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
41,331
Reputation
8,651
Daps
201,619
Reppin
NULL
no one in here mentioned anything about a rhetorical question, it was about how Rome would look guilty either way that he answered the Stern's question.
Couldn't the same be said for "Was the fix in for the lottery?"
 

phillycavsfan

WAHOOWA
Supporter
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
22,661
Reputation
1,612
Daps
44,767
Reppin
Philadelphia
no one in here mentioned anything about a rhetorical question, it was about how Rome would look guilty either way that he answered the Stern's question.

you're trying to change the argument.

Read the first few pages of the thread. It's established pretty quickly that it's something lawyers say all the time.
 
Top