So all Hitler had to do was not backstab stalin...and london west Europe is his

Uchiha God

Veteran
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
15,020
Reputation
7,374
Daps
93,226
Reppin
NULL
So what it sounds like is Germany did not have the manpower nor resources to win World War II. Even if they did "defeat" Russia they would have been mired in a years long guerrilla warfare campaign with Communist Partisans which would have numbered in the millions while also attempting to stave off a superior British Air Force and Navy and a massively industrialized United States. We also have to consider what constitutes victory in Russia. Most people assume it would have been the taking of Moscow but there was no indication Russia would have surrendered into submission if the Germans did manage to take the capital and the losses to do so would have been incredible. The Russians were always fighting a battle of attrition with the Germans and they were always going to win eventually, even if the Germans managed to take the Caucus oil fields. It just would have prolonged the German war effort but in no way, shape or form guarantee them a victory.

America still would have developed the atomic bomb and instead of dropping them on Japan would have used them on both Germany and Japan as there were plans to use the bomb in the European theatre anyway but by the time it was ready Germany was already on the floor for the ten count. Germany managing to take the Russian oil fields or Moscow would have only made an already bloody conflict much worse given their renewed ability to wage war but they didn't have the tools in place for an ultimate victory. As long as Russia and America are in the picture Germany cannot win the war.

That's not how wars work breh, or at least worked (the advancement in weapons tech has changed the landscape completely). there were millions of french people in France yet Hitler managed to lock their country down. Even if resistance exists, it can hardly do anything substantial without the coordinated efforts and/or backing of a "government", this is easily observable anywhere else in the world where a civil conflict exists, hence the opposing side to whatever government pretty much usually resorting to "guerrilla warfare". People tend to think of numbers as a decider, yet here we have Germany, which in many regards hadn't even fully recovered from WWI and the sanctions imposed on it, having the world shook. Not even tech is a decider (the U.S knows this due to nam and afghanistan), yes the british had superior air force but the air fields bombings rendered that advantage almost obsolete for large parts of the conflict.

The taking of Moscow would have immediately been followed by locking down strategic points, routes, and military bases as well as production sites, and a puppet "russian" government would have also be installed to assuage the populous. this isn't mere speculation neither, its exactly what the nazis did everywhere else, look at Austria, Czechoslovakia, France (he split France in two with the germans occupying the north and placed a phoney french government in the south "Vichy France").

If the Soviet Union had fallen, eventually so would Britain in the North of Africa and then the West because Hitler would have had fuel, supplies, and machines to commit to the North African front like his generals advised and then it would be a question of time til mainland Britain fell too, as they would have choked out supplies from the commonwealth. hell, Churchill had already been deliberating about suing for peace.

Hitler saw the British as an expansion of his "aryan" ideal. Hess, Hitler's deputy, said that "Hitler had great respect for the english people". Nazis often attempted to recruit British prisoners of war to their side. Eventually, some British POWs volunteered to fight for the nazis and formed a small waffen-ss unit called "legion of st. george" (this is another thing that's often overlooked about Hitler, he was demonic but charismatic, that's how he rose in the first place, dude studied which looks, poses and voice tones would have had the most impact on people when he was locked up, and every country he absorbed, he managed to sway substantial numbers to his "cause"). Secondly, Britain is an island or achipelago, it makes potential ground invasions time/weather sensitive (keep in mind that weaponry and logistics at the time differed from what we have currently), and their Air Force was nothing to fukk with, especially if you were going to commit ground troops. Thirdly, he feared that if Britain was to fall, part of its empire would have fallen/ended up on U.S' hands (tensions between U.S and Germany had been growing since Hitler made a move for Poland, and forced Britain's and France's hands). His beef with Britain wasn't really that serious (hell, when he first started making moves and annexing land and introduced military conscription to grow his forces many times over what the "versailles treaty" said germany was allowed to, he seduced both england and france into the "munich agreement" with different conditions), that's why him and Goering decided to change strats from bombing air fields to bombing cities, and later tried to siege. They wanted to force London into suing for peace so they could focus on the Soviet Union.

contrary to popular belief, the U.S weren't the military boogeyman back then that people like to think they were, the conflict expedited the growth of the U.S military industrial exponentially, and that included the manhattan project/atomic bomb, but the nazis were close to reach it too, and they had their wunderwaffe weapons program which had to be rushed due to fighting on so many fronts. Had Soviet Union been consolidated as German territory, it was gonna be halloween for us.
 
Last edited:

Ricky Dunigan

Superstar
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
6,529
Reputation
776
Daps
18,668
That's why i love this site. Been going to sleep watching WW2 in Color every night.

Alot of brehs with great info here.

Just wanted to add that Blitzkrieg, once stalled probably had no chance on the Russian front. It was a great strategy, but dangerous. The German lines were thinned all over. That's the trade off. Their mobility allowed them to strafe opponents easily, but in the long run, you can't maintain pressure.

The true winner of WW2 funny enough was Franco in Spain. He let the Germans practice Lightening Warfare to help him win his civil war, then never helped Hitler in any great measure. He got his, then thought of every excuse in the book not to enter the war.
 

Easy-E

TSC's Ric Flair | Heel
Supporter
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
54,182
Reputation
9,705
Daps
161,421
Reppin
Negativity (Kayfabe)
And Hitler was not taking London. Germany did not have a navy capable of supporting an amphibious invasion. The best he could hope to do was force a negotiated peace, and that already failed.

Was just watching a WW2 vid and said just that. Plus it being an island and having superior air muscle.
 

Spiritual Stratocaster

Jesus is KING
Supporter
Joined
Aug 14, 2014
Messages
38,606
Reputation
7,294
Daps
149,578
The taking of Moscow would have immediately been followed by locking down strategic points, routes, and military bases as well as production sites, and a puppet "russian" government would have also be installed to assuage the populous. this isn't mere speculation neither, its exactly what the nazis did everywhere else, look at Austria, Czechoslovakia, France (he split France in two with the germans occupying the north and placed a phoney french government in the south "Vichy France").
Nazi plan for russians was death/slavery
 

Jhoon

Spontaneous Mishaps and Hijinks
Joined
Jul 2, 2012
Messages
16,518
Reputation
1,500
Daps
37,704
Hitler was legitimately insane. I picked up a copy of Mein Kampf at my college library and was like :picard: after the first twenty pages. Dude was craziest internet troll level crazy. Delusional, overly simplistic thinking, hysterical, etc. There was no way his story was going to end any other way than it did.
Are racists complex?
 

Ricky Dunigan

Superstar
Joined
Jan 18, 2017
Messages
6,529
Reputation
776
Daps
18,668
Watching more WW2... Jesus Hitler was an awful technical commander. Once he took more control, he basically fed his ppl to the Russians.

I thought it was a rumor that he had a no retreat mantra...nah B, his ppl literally had to commit treason to fall back or be wiped out to a man. Stalin wasnt playing...
 
Top