SMH at Uncle Curtis :

69 others

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,526
Reputation
736
Daps
24,139
Reppin
NULL
If you are going to argue a point, you must be armed with facts "CHEETAH VISION" is 50 Cent Emmet/FLURA are his partners they are in business together. He's part owner.

Now go to the video and look at the moniker again as they step off the elevator at the 2min10sec point.

:usure: Emmet/Flura is a company by both emmet and flura not actually emmett and flura and it's separate from emmett's dealings with 50 and it was started long before that, step your reading game up.
Combining his financial sensibility with an eye for filmmaking, RANDALL EMMETT (Producer) has produced over 50 feature films in less than 10 years. With a reputation for packaging movies and getting them made – no small feat in a town full of good intentions – Emmett’s films have been seen around the world, debuting at such festivals as Sundance, Berlin and Toronto, with many being nominated for Independent Spirit Awards. Emmett is a partner with George Furla and owner of Emmett/Furla Films, a production company with a distribution and financing deal with Nu Image/Millennium Films, that rolled into the publicly traded company, Family Room Entertainment, for which they serve as co-chairmen.
Emmett/Furla Films [us]

and i ain't looking and no moniker in that stupid video again cause you seem to be missing the bigger picture. it doesn't matter if 50's name was branded all over the company what matters is who actually run what. now again ask yourself why these two guys who have been making movies together for quite some time suddenly need to partner up with 50 to make deals?
 

backbreaker65

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,679
Reputation
-415
Daps
10,387
Reppin
The Passage of Time
:usure: Emmet/Flura is a company by both emmet and flura not actually emmett and flura and it's separate from emmett's dealings with 50 and it was started long before that, step your reading game up.
Emmett/Furla Films [us]

and i ain't looking and no moniker in that stupid video again cause you seem to be missing the bigger picture. it doesn't matter if 50's name was branded all over the company what matters is who actually run what. now again ask yourself why these two guys who have been making movies together for quite some time suddenly need to partner up with 50 to make deals?

You have no clue of which you're speaking. So if I own something and I let knowledgeable people run it and run it effectively, and since I don't run it I am somehow still not the owner or partner? So with every Emmet/Furla picture being made, it also has as a producer Cheetah Vision, its just branding and nothing more?

NBA Owner Mark Cuban

Who runs the day to day operations the Coach and GM

Now does that diminish Mark Cuban as owner?

why these two guys who have been making movies together for quite some time suddenly need to partner up with 50 to make deals?

Well maybe, just maybe they were looking for investors or partners and 50 was like OK, I'll buy in or invest at what percentage no one knows. But whatever the cost or percentage he gets branding in the office, in the movie, as well as playing roles in the movie.

You can try and diminish this mans role in owning a company, but the facts are clear, he is a partner, and you just can't seem to handle it for some reason.
 

69 others

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,526
Reputation
736
Daps
24,139
Reppin
NULL
You have no clue of which you're speaking. So if I own something and I let knowledgeable people run it and run it effectively, and since I don't run it I am somehow still not the owner or partner? So with every Emmet/Furla picture being made, it also has as a producer Cheetah Vision, its just branding and nothing more?

NBA Owner Mark Cuban

Who runs the day to day operations the Coach and GM

Now does that diminish Mark Cuban as owner?

why these two guys who have been making movies together for quite some time suddenly need to partner up with 50 to make deals?

Well maybe, just maybe they were looking for investors or partners and 50 was like OK, I'll buy in or invest at what percentage no one knows. But whatever the cost or percentage he gets branding in the office, in the movie, as well as playing roles in the movie.

You can try and diminish this mans role in owning a company, but the facts are clear, he is a partner, and you just can't seem to handle it for some reason.

shut your dumb ged ass up. since you came in this thread you've been trying to kick nonsense as knowledge. it's clear that your reading, comprehension, and critical thinking skills are lacking. in all the articles people posted it clearly said they got funding, for your dumb ass it means that someone else put up the capital, for all these movies. i asked a sensible question and all you could do is respond about some logo you saw on a vid and the typical dumbass go to answer when losing an argument "you must be mad or hating". once again clown if two men were doing something for years why would they bring in another person to split profit 3 ways if that person wasn't bringing relevant skills or cash. it's clear that 50 is only bringing his brand name and his involvement is all marketing. ain't nothing wrong with that all i'm saying is don't believe the hype.
 

backbreaker65

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,679
Reputation
-415
Daps
10,387
Reppin
The Passage of Time
shut your dumb ged ass up. since you came in this thread you've been trying to kick nonsense as knowledge. it's clear that your reading, comprehension, and critical thinking skills are lacking. in all the articles people posted it clearly said they got funding, for your dumb ass it means that someone else put up the capital, for all these movies. i asked a sensible question and all you could do is respond about some logo you saw on a vid and the typical dumbass go to answer when losing an argument "you must be mad or hating". once again clown if two men were doing something for years why would they bring in another person to split profit 3 ways if that person wasn't bringing relevant skills or cash. it's clear that 50 is only bringing his brand name and his involvement is all marketing. ain't nothing wrong with that all i'm saying is don't believe the hype.


When you can't back up your facts, attack in an emotional way. Go listen to his breakfast club interview in which he states about raising 200mil twice for his filming production company.

You sound hurt calling me a dumbass and a ged student, all because I challenged your claim.

Your first argument it was emmett/furla office with his posters. And then when I brought to light that Cheetah Vision is 50 cent. You resort to why would they need him, its all about who runs the company. I give you an example about ownership and who runs day to day operations. Your argument is exhausted and here comes the ad-hominem attacks. Go figure, why would they need him, that is a question for them. He gets producers credit in all their films so what does that mean Mr. Masters Degree?
 

69 others

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
6,526
Reputation
736
Daps
24,139
Reppin
NULL
When you can't back up your facts, attack in an emotional way. Go listen to his breakfast club interview in which he states about raising 200mil twice for his filming production company.

You sound hurt calling me a dumbass and a ged student, all because I challenged your claim.

Your first argument it was emmett/furla office with his posters. And then when I brought to light that Cheetah Vision is 50 cent. You resort to why would they need him, its all about who runs the company. I give you an example about ownership and who runs day to day operations. Your argument is exhausted and here comes the ad-hominem attacks. Go figure, why would they need him, that is a question for them. He gets producers credit in all their films so what does that mean Mr. Masters Degree?

like i said your reading, comprehension, and critical thinking skills are lacking i hope you're not an adult.
Go listen to his breakfast club interview in which he states about raising 200mil twice for his filming production company.
you still don't get it do you. of course he would say that and why do you think? like i said i hope you're not an adult cause if you really believe what half these entertaners say then sorry for you, it's all marketing.

Your first argument it was emmett/furla office with his posters. And then when I brought to light that Cheetah Vision is 50 cent. You resort to why would they need him, its all about who runs the company. I give you an example about ownership and who runs day to day operations.

i was never arguing about posters in the office all i said it didn't matter and i doesn't. i did say cheetah vision was with 50 and emmett (once again your reading skills are in question). you really believe that emmett/furlla are just producing and 50 is running things? i'll repeat again the $200 mill is not 50's it's from private investors(you seem to be daft to this). which brings up the point, that if someone is going to invest in movies who would they most likely do it with. two producers making movies for years or a rapper turn producer with a few flops below his belt. also what example of ownership you gave me i hope it wasn't 50's posters and name in the office from that vid:heh: cause like i said i wasn't arguing whether 50's is part of cheetah vision or not (posted that he was) the main argument is how much of a stake he have in this and what his role really is.
 

backbreaker65

All Star
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
4,679
Reputation
-415
Daps
10,387
Reppin
The Passage of Time
like i said your reading, comprehension, and critical thinking skills are lacking i hope you're not an adult.

you still don't get it do you. of course he would say that and why do you think? like i said i hope you're not an adult cause if you really believe what half these entertaners say then sorry for you, it's all marketing.



i was never arguing about posters in the office all i said it didn't matter and i doesn't. i did say cheetah vision was with 50 and emmett (once again your reading skills are in question). you really believe that emmett/furlla are just producing and 50 is running things? i'll repeat again the $200 mill is not 50's it's from private investors(you seem to be daft to this). which brings up the point, that if someone is going to invest in movies who would they most likely do it with. two producers making movies for years or a rapper turn producer with a few flops below his belt. also what example of ownership you gave me i hope it wasn't 50's posters and name in the office from that vid:heh: cause like i said i wasn't arguing whether 50's is part of cheetah vision or not (posted that he was) the main argument is how much of a stake he have in this and what his role really is.

You still don't get so I'm done. Read what I wrote mr. comprehendor. I said the word "raised". You are stuck on an idea of him being a front man. I'm saying he's more than that, just by his track record on business deals.

Vitaman water he wanted ownership instead of a check

Gunnar Optiks part ownership

G Unit Clothing line with Ecko Part owner ship

Head Phone line He owns that as well

So when I see a ignorant nikka like yourself trying to clown and say why would they need him he brings nothing to the table just his celebrity. I just say you don't know how this man attaches himself to the products he sales.

So miss with your bullshyt 99% of celebrities do it this way, because Fif, has never did it that way.
 

RenAi!

Half RenAi, Half Amazin'.
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
1,787
Reputation
109
Daps
2,035
Reppin
TOKYO, Taitou-Ku.
i could break the dvd movie game down for these idiots but i know it'll fall on death ears.


:comeon:


Screen-shot-2011-06-15-at-12.23.23-PM.png

:deadrose:
 

AMcV'88

Superstar
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
16,672
Reputation
4,137
Daps
41,151
Reppin
Uptown, Downtown, Switzerland
last movie i seen with 50 in it was that Twelve shyt...bought it on a whim like a darker Gossip Girl... shiet even had a actor from it in it as the lead.
watched it with no expectations..it was a decent enough one time watch i suppose.. had potential but never amounted to it.
 
Top