the ancients never said this beyond cats like you coming through and extrapolating shyt from things they never said.Vibrations are frequencies, frequencies are waves, and waves determine our physical reality. So yes, the ancients were right all along. God speaking the world into existence makes more sense now right?The universe being a hologram confrims another ancient belief, as above so below. Science must reunite with spirituality, the greatest error science ever made was trying to establish itself as a rival of spirituality. Space and time are not separate, in quantum physics its called spacetime. Think of it like this, the question "where am i?" is both a location and a time. Where i am is constantly changing unless you know the specific time when you want to locate me.
The part about simulated reality that blows my mind is this. If we agree reality is simulated, then it's most likely that even the simulation is simulated.
"Simulations back up theory that Universe is a hologram "
- Thread starter Poitier
- Start date
A-fukking-men
Uncle Kingpin
No Relation
WRONG. They found this out with slugs, they wanted to cut out the part of the brain that regulated feeding. First they cut out the part they thought it was, the slug still ate. Then they cut it into into pieces, the slug still ate. Then they scrambled it's brain but it still ate. The only way this could be possible is if the individual parts of the brain all contained the whole i.e. Holographic.
For an introduction on the theory read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holonomic_brain_theory
The idea of "As above, so below" can be traced back to Thoth, the egyptian god of writing and magic. The idea of sound being life is older than we can trace back, but for example, the book of genesis says God spoke the world into existence.
Instead of assuming others know nothing when you dont understand, you should ask where the information came from instead of automatically rejecting it. That is the definition of ignorance.
easy there...I'm not someone you can pull that wool over like that...
If you know anything abuot mouse models or even human satiety then you know "regulating feeding" is hella vague. There are hormones and other impetus' to eating. Is that satiety? is that hunger? is that the regulation of digestive hormones and neurological stimulation? Or does that mean merely putting food in their mouths?
Sometimes you can still have animals that have the satiety removed, but eat until they just get sick cause their regulation is cut, doesn't mean they can't eate.
Eating also stimulates further digestive processes by the mere presence of things like carbs in human tongues, etc.
How does that even make sense to you?
Think about that for a moment.
And this theory doesn't support what you think it does.
And the vedas tell us to honor thy mother and father. whats your point?
how does ANY of this THEREFORE legitimize the words of your favorite theological text?
You know what else is ignorant? Presupposing that the bible carries weight and looking to stick it into half-assed theories that you barely understand cause some science magazine (whose interest is in generating revenue, not education) posted it.
I suggest you take Richard Feynman's essay on "Cargo Cult Science" to heart good sir.
@Cat piss martini was right, your momma really aint shyt 
Uncle Kingpin
No Relation
The holonomic (holographic) brain theory was developed by a neuroscientist named Pribram, who repeated the slug experiment and got the same results. This means what we consider as "the brain" is non-local, and operates outside of time and space. Neuroplasticity, the brain's ability to adapt, is thought to be the result of this. For example, people with traumatic brain injuries can regain functions that are normally regulated by parts that are now damaged.
Like i told the other troll, you cant question me unless you know more than me because how would you know if my answer was right or not? Instead of arguing and dismissing things you know nothing about, go read, research and test the information. Everything i've said can be found on google, but a good introduction to what i'm talking about is The Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot http://www.epubbud.com/read.php?g=44P7XCWT&p=0
I hear what you're saying but neuroplasticity is only really evident in young people.
Uncle Kingpin
No Relation
No it's not about age. The politician, Kathy Griffords, was shot in the left side of her brain and has recovered functions due to neuroplasticity.
Except this frame of thought is basically at this point pseudoscience despite the sheer implausibility of it.
OK Deepak. Continue talking in vague ass terms thinking you're actually clued into something.
I'll check it out when Kandel has something to say on this.
well mercy me...I thought it was SYNAPTIC POTENTIATION...
This is my u-grad field tho...
I seriously doubt her injuries were severe. What lobe did she suffer damage in? Someone like Phineas Gage is evidence that you lose certain functioning after a certain age that won't be recovered.
At a young age those brain cells haven't fully underwent specification. Why do you think stem cells are so lauded?
Uncle Kingpin
No Relation
Except this frame of thought is basically at this point pseudoscience despite the sheer implausibility of it.
OK Deepak. Continue talking in vague ass terms thinking you're actually clued into something.
I'll check it out when Kandel has something to say on this.
well mercy me...I thought it was SYNAPTIC POTENTIATION...
This is my u-grad field tho...
So your an undergrad in Quantum Physics? And you dont believe in quantum entanglement???the neurosciences...but quantum entanglement has NOT been demonstrably shown in a neurological sense. At this point its basically an idea extrapolated from what we BARELY understand.
You're teetering on the border of sounding like one of those dudes who saw a Sagan documentary and now think you're qualified to work at CERN
theoretical science and the people that believe in it
Most hard sciences started off theoretical
Uncle Kingpin
No Relation
Most people die from a head shot, and those that do survive are usually vegetables.
Your thinking of "use it or lose it" which happens with synapses. Im talking about losing a whole part of the brain but still regaining their functions.