shouldn't Ancient Egypt be counted as an extension of Nubia?

[theworldismine13]

So what you're saying is you believe Arabs were stuffing black slaves into ships even though the demand for slaves wasn't as high as in the Americas, things like that weren't going on in the Arab trade not to mention in some cases Africans were allowed to keep aspects of their culture like music and stories. The European version barred slaves from reading, writing, or any kind of learning aside from the ones in the house and were treated no differently than cattle yes or no? African slaves in the Arab world lived better than those in the New World/West Indies in that they were integrated into society and lived off of the masters wealth as oppose to under his whip and boot. I'm not at all saying it was benevolent, but compared to cacs it was tame. Both were fukked up regardless either way.

yeah i am saying they were stuffing them into ships, and they were doing it way past even the time the europeans had stopped

are you saying that this slavery is better? what you are saying is a lie, arab slave trade was not kinder and gentler than the european slave trade

http://www.southworld.net/newtest/index.php/2011-07-25-15-56-33/itemlist/date/2012/7?start=10

you have to be stupid or ignorant to say that arab slavery was kinder or gentler, how is being castrated and used as a sex slave better than working on a plantation, what is even the point of making that argument? you are a sick demented fuk and a c00n

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

yeah i am saying they were stuffing them into ships, and they were doing it way past even the time the europeans had stopped

are you saying that this slavery is better? what you are saying is a lie, arab slave trade was not kinder and gentler than the european slave trade

http://www.southworld.net/newtest/index.php/2011-07-25-15-56-33/itemlist/date/2012/7?start=10

you have to be stupid or ignorant to say that arab slavery was kinder or gentler, how is being castrated and used as a sex slave better than working on a plantation, what is even the point of making that argument? you are a sick demented fuk and a c00n

Are you a fukkin idiot or something? It's like you're purposely glossing over what I'm saying. Maybe I'm not making it simple enough for you, so I'll leave your dumbass to decipher.

 

[theworldismine13]

Are you a fukkin idiot or something? It's like you're purposely glossing over what I'm saying. Maybe I'm not making it simple enough for you, so I'll leave your dumbass to decipher.

i was gonna say the same thing, what i told you is that to the people that actually got sold into slavery your points are irrelevant

what part of that sentence is it that you dont understand?

dying from getting your nuts cut off is not better than dying from a whip, dumb fuk, getting raped by an arab is not different then getting rapped by a european

and any african that doesnt defend the individual rights of another african is a c00n, period

 

[Sinnerman]

Instead of posting pictures of books that were played out in 1999 why don't you address the issue in your own words?

Egyptian yoga?

I haven't read the other 4, but the first book is very good.

I've never heard anything about india being an ethiopian colony doe

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

i was gonna say the same thing, what i told you is that to the people that actually got sold into slavery your points are irrelevant

what part of that sentence is it that you dont understand?

I understand it clearly. But we're the ones discussing the subject and we are neither of those people tho so your point is irrelevant as well. I'm simply looking at the two in a vacuum and to mean on the whole from the transfer to the practice itself its my opinion that the European side of it was worse. I repeat, I'm not at all trying to say the Arab side was good I'm saying the outcome of the slave(as long as they weren't castrated) was better off than chattel slaves in the Americas. Again, both are fukked up, no justifying stealing Africans from their land to put them in bondage, but so long as I'm allowed to keep my balls I'd rather live in the home of some Sultan doing his taxes or guarding the front gate than gettin beat the fukk down with whips, made to work in the hot sun. Not to say there weren't African slaves in the Arab fields but there were also African slaves in other positions which would make them far more advantaged than their European counterparts.

Once again, the point I'm making is that there was a better chance for the slaves lot to improve in the Arab slave structure as oppose to the American one. Not that Arabs were good or benevolent people. The way they did it and for what purpose was different. Doesn't absolve them for their role in destroying the continent, Africa's fall off began with the Arabs not the Europeans so fukk them too.

 

[theworldismine13]

I understand it clearly. But we're the ones discussing the subject and we are neither of those people tho so your point is irrelevant as well. I'm simply looking at the two in a vacuum and to mean on the whole from the transfer to the practice itself its my opinion that the European side of it was worse. I repeat, I'm not at all trying to say the Arab side was good I'm saying the outcome of the slave(as long as they weren't castrated) was better off than chattel slaves in the Americas. Again, both are fukked up, no justifying stealing Africans from their land to put them in bondage, but so long as I'm allowed to keep my balls I'd rather live in the home of some Sultan doing his taxes or guarding the front gate than gettin beat the fukk down with whips, made to work in the hot sun. Not to say there weren't African slaves in the Arab fields but there were also African slaves in other positions which would make them far more advantaged than their European counterparts.

Once again, the point I'm making is that there was a better chance for the slaves lot to improve in the Arab slave structure as oppose to the American one. Not that Arabs were good or benevolent people. The way they did it and for what purpose was different. Doesn't absolve them for their role in destroying the continent, Africa's fall off began with the Arabs not the Europeans so fukk them too.

but what you are saying is a lie, you are trying to say that black slaves were not used as chattel, which is a lie, black slaves were also used as chattel in arab slavery and that slavery went on for longer

you are obviously ignorant about the extent of the arab slave trade and are trying to focus on some slaves that got treated well, shyt is just corny, stupid and c00nish and i dont really give fuk, let me repeat, I DONT GIVE A FUK THAT SOME SLAVES WERE DOING TAXES, suggesting that arab slavery was better is a god dam lie and anybody pushing that line is a c00n

and you had the nerve to say that arabs were not stuffing slaves into ships and i posted a picture, not a drawing, A PICTURE of arabs stuffing slaves into ships, do you realize the significance that i posted A PICTURE and not a drawing of arabs stuffing black slaves into ships?

i have an idea, why dont you shut the fuk up, you disgust me

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

but what you are saying is a lie, you are trying to say that black slaves were not used as chattel, which is a lie, black slaves were also used as chattel in the arab slavery and that slavery went on for longer

you are obviously ignorant about the extent of the arab slave trade and trying to focus on some slaves that got treated well is just corny, stupid and c00nish and i dont really give fuk, let me repeat, I DONT GIVE A FUK THAT SOME SLAVES WERE DOING TAXES, suggesting that arab slavery was in better is a god dam lie and anybody pushing that line is a c00n

and you had the nerve to say that arab were not stuffing slaves into ships and i posted a picture, not a drawing, A PICTURE of arabs stuffing slaves into ships, do you realize the significance that i posted A PICTURE and not a drawing of arabs stuffing black slaves into ships?

i have an idea, why dont you shut the fuk up, you disgust me

I can't scan any of my reading material on this subject so this is pointless. Plus I forgot you hate Arabs more than I do that's why you're using all caps showing your skirt. Kinda ironic to call me ignorant and you keep using c00n aka the most ignorantly used word on the coli. You have a good one tho.

 

[theworldismine13]

I can't scan any of my reading material on this subject so this is pointless. Plus I forgot you hate Arabs more than I do that's why you're using all caps showing your skirt. Kinda ironic to call me ignorant and you keep using c00n aka the most ignorantly used word on the coli. You have a good one tho.

like i said in my original post, i use c00n for lack of a better term

lets say i hate arabs, is there something wrong with me hating arabs? do i owe something to arabs?

it doesnt matter what you read, trying to delve into the the details of the arab slave trade doesnt show it to be better, if anything it shows it to be worse

im using caps cuz you disgust me and its like you cant grasp that to the people that were actually sold into slavery your points are irrelevant, on top of that you are just straight up lying in suggesting that black slaves were not used as chattel in the arab slave trade

 

[2Quik4UHoes]

like i said in my original post, i use c00n for lack of a better term

lets say i hate arabs, is there something wrong with me hating arabs? do i owe something to arabs?

it doesnt matter what you read, trying to delve into the the details of the arab slave trade doesnt show it to be better, if anything it shows it to be worse

im using caps cuz you disgust me and its like you cant grasp that to the people that were actually sold into slavery your points are irrelevant, on top of that you are just straight up lying in suggesting that black slaves were not used as chattel in the arab slave trade

Fair enough, I'd find a better term tho.

Nothing wrong with it at all, I don't care for them either. Doesn't mean I'll let that hate make me biased.

I fully grasp what you're saying but what does that matter now? I tried to just compare the two in a vacuum to show the differences. I think you and I can both agree that slavery of any kind is bullshyt and being taken from your family, home, and culture is fukked up and wrong. However, I'm not lying mainly because I never said chattel slavery didn't happen in the Arab world, actually in one of my last posts at the end of the paragraph I mention African slaves being in the Arab fields however, the men were also for military service this is a fact which made that side different. In some cases like India for instance, those same black slaves came to run their own armies and navies controlling territory for themselves and eventually broke off from the local rulers. Understood both are fukked up in the end, Arabs took damn near 200 million people over several centuries and hardly any of them exist today cuz of their perverse castrating, baby killing ways, on this side cacs made it their hobby and job to keep blacks disadvantaged throughout generations. Lets just say fukk both of them and move on.

 

[theworldismine13]

Fair enough, I'd find a better term tho.

Nothing wrong with it at all, I don't care for them either. Doesn't mean I'll let that hate make me biased.

I fully grasp what you're saying but what does that matter now? I tried to just compare the two in a vacuum to show the differences. I think you and I can both agree that slavery of any kind is bullshyt and being taken from your family, home, and culture is fukked up and wrong. However, I'm not lying mainly because I never said chattel slavery didn't happen in the Arab world, actually in one of my last posts at the end of the paragraph I mention African slaves being in the Arab fields however, the men were also for military service this is a fact which made that side different. In some cases like India for instance, those same black slaves came to run their own armies and navies controlling territory for themselves and eventually broke off from the local rulers. Understood both are fukked up in the end, Arabs took damn near 200 million people over several centuries and hardly any of them exist today cuz of their perverse castrating, baby killing ways, on this side cacs made it their hobby and job to keep blacks disadvantaged throughout generations. Lets just say fukk both of them and move on.

it matters a whole lot now mostly because in the other threads people and in black american history people have asserted that islam is better than christianity, and i disagreed which led to me exposing the arab slave trade

of course there were differences between the arab slave trade and the european slave trade, so what? why exactly would i give a fuk if some slaves did taxes or some slaves became soldiers? the reality is that the more you delve into the details of the arab slave trade the worse it becomes, i fail to see how some slaves being treated better means anything, some slaves in America were treated well to and they ran estates and households, a lot of them gained their freedom and led significant lives and contributed to the development of America.................AND?

ive been saying fukk both of them, but for some reason you wanted to bring up the fact that there were a lot of house negros in the arab slave trade and for some strange reason you seem to think that makes it not so bad

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

it matters a whole lot now mostly because in the other threads people and in black american history people have asserted that islam is better than christianity, and i disagreed which led to me exposing the arab slave trade

of course there were differences between the arab slave trade and the european slave trade, so what? why exactly would i give a fuk if some slaves did taxes or some slaves became soldiers? the reality is that the more you delve into the details of the arab slave trade the worse it becomes, i fail to see how some slaves being treated better means anything, some slaves in America were treated well to and they ran estates and households, a lot of them gained their freedom and led significant lives and contributed to the development of America.................AND?

ive been saying fukk both of them, but for some reason you wanted to bring up the fact that there were a lot of house negros in the arab slave trade and for some strange reason you seem to think that makes it not so bad

hey hey, guys stop it. we all hate cacs and sand cacs equally; they both forced their dumbass religions (islam,christianity) and culture on us.

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

Because they were different

no, they werent

 

[Box Cutta]

As long as we acknowledge that they were BLACK I don't give a fukk about the semantics.

 

[Amare's Right Hook]

no, they werent

yes

 

[Im Kemet Rocky & I like penis]

yes

no