Shiba Inu (SHIB) Discussion Thread

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Bushed
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
146,218
Reputation
15,783
Daps
583,940
Reppin
Queens,NY
Yeah that’s as high as I’m willing to lose on this can’t get right coin. Saitama burned me too bad on putting too much in shyt coins.

I know about saitama i was fukked up on that shyt too...:heh: but realize this whales literally from day one spent thousands buying up billions of this shyt... so someone else out there has way more to lose than us. :francis: also remember how it was when leading up to shibaswap and people was panicking its literally the same shyt. its not going to a penny overnight it's gonna take time...
 

ORDER_66

The Fire Rises 2023
Bushed
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
146,218
Reputation
15,783
Daps
583,940
Reppin
Queens,NY
Just a heads up the FUD was bullshyt like i knew it was. sabotage as usual... :stopitslime:


Claims that Shibarium is a Rinia clone fall flat.

KRYPSTEIN (@MrDonGG), the Firechain and Rinia testnet developer, has refuted claims that developers of Shiba Inu’s Ethereum Layer 2 protocol, Shibarium, stole or cloned his code.

they didnt copy the code,” the developer wrote in a Telegram message in response to inquiries from The Crypto Basic. “the [they] used the ChainId.”

“my code wouldve been opensourced and free,” he added. “that wouldnt have been a problem if they did. everything i create or fork is opensource and free to use.”

According to the self-professed Shiba Inu lover, his only gripe is that Shibarium developers used his chain ID, which he explains is a tribute to his late grandmother, who he named the Firechain testnet after.

It bears mentioning that tweets from the developer also back this up as complaints have only been about the chain ID and never that Shibarium developers cloned his code.

See the exchange between The Crypto Basic and the Rinia developer below:


20230316 111949


20230316 112016


20230316 112036


20230316 112121


For context, a chain ID is one of two identifiers for Ethereum chains. It is used in transaction signatures and should be different for each chain. This is because if two chains have the same ID, transactions signed on one would also execute on the other.

While chain IDs are automatically generated when a blockchain is deployed, it bears mentioning that developers can change this default ID when they like.

Recall that, as reported today, a member of the BONE Discord had accused Shibarium developers of cloning the code for the Rinia testnet. He supported this claim by highlighting that Shibarium’s recently launched beta public testnet had the same chain ID as Rinia, which had launched last year.

As highlighted in the report, Shiba Inu lead developers Shytoshi Kusama and Kaal Dhairya refuted these claims. In addition, Kaal, in a Twitter thread, noted that it was an oversight on his part for failing to check if the randomly chosen chain ID had already been registered. Consequently, Kaal revealed plans to redeploy Puppynet with a new chain ID in the coming days.

As explained in the previous report, chain ID is one of many things that make a blockchain unique.


@mannyrs13
 

mannyrs13

Compound Kingpin
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
38,928
Reputation
15,615
Daps
86,587
Reppin
Focusville, USA
Just a heads up the FUD was bullshyt like i knew it was. sabotage as usual... :stopitslime:


Claims that Shibarium is a Rinia clone fall flat.

KRYPSTEIN (@MrDonGG), the Firechain and Rinia testnet developer, has refuted claims that developers of Shiba Inu’s Ethereum Layer 2 protocol, Shibarium, stole or cloned his code.

they didnt copy the code,” the developer wrote in a Telegram message in response to inquiries from The Crypto Basic. “the [they] used the ChainId.”

“my code wouldve been opensourced and free,” he added. “that wouldnt have been a problem if they did. everything i create or fork is opensource and free to use.”

According to the self-professed Shiba Inu lover, his only gripe is that Shibarium developers used his chain ID, which he explains is a tribute to his late grandmother, who he named the Firechain testnet after.

It bears mentioning that tweets from the developer also back this up as complaints have only been about the chain ID and never that Shibarium developers cloned his code.

See the exchange between The Crypto Basic and the Rinia developer below:


20230316 111949


20230316 112016


20230316 112036


20230316 112121


For context, a chain ID is one of two identifiers for Ethereum chains. It is used in transaction signatures and should be different for each chain. This is because if two chains have the same ID, transactions signed on one would also execute on the other.

While chain IDs are automatically generated when a blockchain is deployed, it bears mentioning that developers can change this default ID when they like.

Recall that, as reported today, a member of the BONE Discord had accused Shibarium developers of cloning the code for the Rinia testnet. He supported this claim by highlighting that Shibarium’s recently launched beta public testnet had the same chain ID as Rinia, which had launched last year.

As highlighted in the report, Shiba Inu lead developers Shytoshi Kusama and Kaal Dhairya refuted these claims. In addition, Kaal, in a Twitter thread, noted that it was an oversight on his part for failing to check if the randomly chosen chain ID had already been registered. Consequently, Kaal revealed plans to redeploy Puppynet with a new chain ID in the coming days.

As explained in the previous report, chain ID is one of many things that make a blockchain unique.


@mannyrs13

yeah it wasn't like it couldn't be fixed or was gonna be a big issue. it was just the same chain id not the same code. still got some rinia, not whatever one they copied tho. should've flipped some profit last night but i kept holding. hopefully it goes back up past ATH again. holder count been growing to over 900 so just waiting to see what happens. still got all my shib. but i'll take a decent and quick flip on this to try and add some more. markets looking great overall this evening.
 
Top