He beat the #2 P4P in MMA, which is easily the best win between either fighter.
He also was beat by a guy with a record of 18-10, who never had been a Champion, and only had 11 days preparation.......which is easily the worst loss between either fighter.
Like I said boxing has double the divisions and 4 champs per division. It's hard to compare accomplishments from 2 different sports.
No it's not. All I'm asking is what has Conor McGregor accomplished that will make his name be relevant 15-20 years from today in his sport?
Adrien Broner has already accomplished something only 14 other people have been able to do in the 100+ history of his sport and is the youngest to ever accomplish it....what has Conor McGregor done?
And again, this article wasn't really about accomplishments.
Then where is the comparision to Adrien Broner?
How you gonna compare someone to a fighter from a different sport, when the MMA fighter's resume isn't even close
Because he talked trash and lost....that makes him Adrien Broner?
That is VERY simple logic imo, because Broner was hyped because of what he did in the ring (he was undefeated, 3x Champion over 3 different divisions, jumped up 2 divisions and won the Championship in his first fight there), not because he talked trash
Why wouldn't McGregor be the new "Chris Weidman"? Why wouldn't he be the new "Rhonda Rousey"? Why wouldn't he be the new "Tito Ortiz"? You know...other MMA fighters
MMA heads always using Boxer's names to live off. First it's Floyd, now it's Broner