Why wouldn't stand a chance, lawler is slow as fukk and he doesn't have better boxing than Nate Diaz.
lawler is basic as fukks, 170 is just as trash as middleweight except at least Rockhold is above average, there's nobody like that a 170
Nate Diaz can beat Robbie lawler lol, yall acting like this nikka Anderson Silva or something lol
LMAO @ Lawler being basic. He got the best hands @ 170 period. Don't mistake punching power and ferocity for lack of technique. He's a tremendous counter puncher who uses the same style Conor uses, pressuring and countering the incoming strikes. He's more explosive than Conor, has much better head movement, much more power and isn't a one trick pony like Conor. (Also Nate Diaz is one of the best boxer in MMA, being worse than him isn't an insult).
As for 170 being trash. You want basic? Luke Rockhold is basic. He got a question mark kick and a check hook. Condit, Rory Mac, Lawler, Wonderboy hell even Johny Redneck got more variety.