Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Vehicles are impossible, such a thing has never been done in a space game before
Shartfield: Episode IV - A New Cope
- Thread starter Dorian Breh
- Start date
Vehicles are impossible, such a thing has never been done in a space game before
Oh shyt, you need roads for vehicles.
Crazy. I think someone said that a couple pages ago.
Now you tell me how a motorcycle is in any way better than a fukkin jet pack in real life?
Humanity has motorcycles right now, and we still wish we had jet packs. Why?
Spider-man can swing on webs, why doesn’t he drive motorcycles?
And still
at you now stanning ubisoft in advance to downplay a game you have not even played yet.Sony stan’s are some goofy mufukkas
movies, games, books, art
you can't be serious right now breh. This is such a hilarious hill to die on
Vehicles are impossible, such a thing has never been done in a space game before
nikkas just post anything to stan.
This is what the “Rover” gameplay in elite dangerous is really like. OMG i wish Starfield had some of this.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
nikkas just post anything to stan.
This is what the “Rover” gameplay in elite dangerous is really like. OMG i wish Starfield had some of this.
Uh…yeah, thats much better than running everywhere
Should post a thread and pose the question if you could use anything to travel the world what would it be.
over under for jetpack mentions
?
over under for jetpack mentions
?
My my my how times have changed. Remember when an Xbox game didn't have real time lighting?Yes, some of you don’t care about tech and are super ok with the time of day not changing till you see a cutscene.
Some of us appreciate a real planetary lighting and physics simulation
At one point in your life you gave a fukk.
But as usual, it only mattered then, cause it aligned with your sony stan aspirations.
Starfield is the ultimate, opposite to “baked lighting” a very impressive achievement to anybody that’s not acting like a sony hoe
And @Fatboi1 you can quit with the driveclub looks better stuff too.
They went for more realistic, dramatic lighting which is why they usually show gameplay with overcast sky's, sunsets, ect to further promote that idea.
But in plain flat daylight it's clear that forza has the better textures and details.
Now this guy is in here acting like he wasn't shytting on Driveclub having dynamic time of day and real time lighting back in the days.
We are talking about playing a game right now.
Vehicles need roads. We are not driving around manhattan right now. If they were to put ground vehicles in the game, they would have to build the levels around that idea. All unnaturally and man made.
As far as this games narrative and gameplay goes, a rover or other vehicle doesn’t make sense. You can fly and teleport. Superman, nore Goku ride in cars
Again, this is like complaining that spider-man can’t drive cars
You goofies just looking for any angle to say some dumb shyt.
Do it.Should post a thread and pose the question if you could use anything to travel the world what would it be.
over under for jetpack mentions
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
My my my how times have changed. Remember when an Xbox game didn't have real time lighting?
Now this guy is in here acting like he wasn't shytting on Driveclub having dynamic time of day and real time lighting back in the days.
Mamma say mama sa mama coosa
What are you even trying to prove here?My my my how times have changed. Remember when an Xbox game didn't have real time lighting?
Now this guy is in here acting like he wasn't shytting on Driveclub having dynamic time of day and real time lighting back in the days.
8 years ago real time lighting was a goal. Games had to make all types of concessions to get there. Like a bunch of invisible walls, low framerates, simple textures, etc.
You were then, comparing a game that was essentially closed off corridors with minimally rendered cars environments and physics to a full car physics simulation.
Same as y’all doing in here. The scope and technical details don’t matter, just whatever aspect you can stan
You same goofies made it seem like any game without real time lighting was already outdated and ugly back then.
Fast forward now 10 years later and a game actually makes real time lighting a universal thing(literally the entire universe) and none of it even matters anymore.
Y’all fine with playing spidey and waiting for a cutscene to change the time of day for you.
It ain’t me that’s switched it up. 10 years later starfield is what we should be getting.
Spider-man is GTA3 PS2 status
We are talking about playing a game right now.
Vehicles need roads. We are not driving around manhattan right now. If they were to put ground vehicles in the game, they would have to build the levels around that idea. All unnaturally and man made.
As far as this games narrative and gameplay goes, a rover or other vehicle doesn’t make sense. You can fly and teleport. Superman, nore Goku ride in cars
Again, this is like complaining that spider-man can’t drive cars
You goofies just looking for any angle to say some dumb shyt.
Why is this game's gameplay held back by the narrative?
I should be able to drive a vehicle, the hell does the story get in the way for?
I'm trying to prove that you are a nasty and sick Xbox stan.What are you even trying to prove here?
8 years ago real time lighting was a goal. Games had to make all types of concessions to get there. Like a bunch of invisible walls, low framerates, simple textures, etc.
You same goofies made it seem like any game without real time lighting was already outdated and ugly back then.
Fast forward now 10 years later and a game actually makes real time lighting a universal thing(literally the entire universe) and none of it even matters anymore.
Y’all fine with playing spidey and waiting for a cutscene to change the time of day for you.
It ain’t me that’s switched it up. 10 years later starfield is what we should be getting.
Spider-man is GTA3 PS2 status
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Yeah…Starfield is cooked, shyt getting outsold by party animals
