Shaq Says Penny Was Every Bit As Good As Kobe

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether


MJ IS THE GOAT CLOSER...

HE COULDN'T CLOSE IN THAT SERIES.

HIS LEGS WERE DONE AT THE END
OF THOSE GAMES.

WE KNOW YOU DONT
WATCH BALL AND CAN ONLY
RESORT TO BOX SCORES
SO SIMPLE shyt LIKE THIS GOES
OVER YOUR HEAD.


:devil:
:evil:





So '95 playoff Jordan already averaged 32-7-5 on 48% shooting......but if he had his legs under him, he would have averaged, what, 37-9-7 on 54%? :russ:

Cause all those extra stats he racks up "closing" would count in his box score. So you're claiming that the '95 playoffs would be the ONE postseason in his 2nd stretch where he'd put up ridiculous #'s even better than his prime.....then why didn't that happen in '96, '97, or '98?


The same player that averaged 31-5-4 on 46% in 1996. Same player that averaged 31-8-5 on 46% in '97. Same player that averaged 32-5-4 on 46% in '98. Why were his scoring, rebounds, assists, defense, and efficiency all WORSE in '96-'98 if he had better legs and better closing in those years?



And you talking about, "But I watch the games!" You were 5 years old in 1995 and you've proven over and over that you don't understand what happens on a basketball court anyway beyond whatever narrative you chose to believe before the games started.


Why is it so hard to just admit that the Bulls added Rodman who put up 12 and 16 on 53% shooting with elite defense, and that Horace Grant averaged 18-11 on 65% shooting in '95, but scored literally 0 points in '96 and had to be replaced with an injured and useless Jon Koncak? Why is it so hard to admit that the Magic were healthy in '95 but lost Grant, Shaw and Anderson in '96 plus had to play Penny and Koncak injured?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether



Penny missed the entire next season due to two microfracture surgeries, but after that they were basically even in their two November 2001 games too.

Penny: 23-4-4 on 47% shooting and 3.5 turnovers, 2-4 threes
Kobe: 21-5-7 on 48% shooting and 4.5 turnovers, 1-3 threes

That was 23yo Kobe a year into his prime versus washed Penny who had undergone 7 surgeries by that point. Split those games 1-1 even though Kobe was halfway between his 2nd/3rd titles while Penny was on a meh Phoenix squad that missed the playoffs.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,101
Reputation
11,545
Daps
367,654
Reppin
CHICAGO
So '95 playoff Jordan already averaged 32-7-5 on 48% shooting......but if he had his legs under him, he would have averaged, what, 37-9-7 on 54%? :russ:

Cause all those extra stats he racks up "closing" would count in his box score. So you're claiming that the '95 playoffs would be the ONE postseason in his 2nd stretch where he'd put up ridiculous #'s even better than his prime.....then why didn't that happen in '96, '97, or '98?


The same player that averaged 31-5-4 on 46% in 1996. Same player that averaged 31-8-5 on 46% in '97. Same player that averaged 32-5-4 on 46% in '98. Why were his scoring, rebounds, assists, defense, and efficiency all WORSE in '96-'98 if he had better legs and better closing in those years?



And you talking about, "But I watch the games!" You were 5 years old in 1995 and you've proven over and over that you don't understand what happens on a basketball court anyway beyond whatever narrative you chose to believe before the games started.


Why is it so hard to just admit that the Bulls added Rodman who put up 12 and 16 on 53% shooting with elite defense, and that Horace Grant averaged 18-11 on 65% shooting in '95, but scored literally 0 points in '96 and had to be replaced with an injured and useless Jon Koncak? Why is it so hard to admit that the Magic were healthy in '95 but lost Grant, Shaw and Anderson in '96 plus had to play Penny and Koncak injured?

:snoop:YOU REALLY ARE AUTISTIC.

USING SERIES AVERAGES
MAKE NO SENSE WHEN THAT SERIES
CAME DOWN TO 2 GAMES.

GAME 1:
MJ WAS 8-22 FOR 19 PTS WITH 8 TURNOVERS

BULLS WERE UP BY 1PT WITH 11 SECONDS LEFT AND JORDAN TUNRED THE BALL
OVER WHICH LEAD TO A GAME WINNING
FAST BREAK DUNK.
HE WAS IN QUICK SAND OUT THERE.

GAME 6:
HE WAS 8-19 FOR 24 PTS WITH 6 TURNOVERS

BULLS LEAD 102-94 IN THE 4TH
AND LOST THE GAME 108-102.

A NON GASSED MJ DOESNT
ALLOW A 14-0 RUN TO END THE GAME
AT HOME IN AN ELIMINATION GAME.

WHERE WAS ALL OF THIS 32 PTS ON 48%
YOU fukkING DOOFUS?

HE COULDNT CLOSE.
:devil:
:evil:

 

Bubba T

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 24, 2015
Messages
8,563
Reputation
2,569
Daps
54,736
Its sad when people have to fight LeBron stan wars by proxy.:scusthov:
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,690
Reputation
-546
Daps
21,634
Yall love this lie. Orlando were simply a better team. Bulls couldn't stop em, and got dominated on the boards.

What happened is that the Bulls got Harper and Rodman. And Nick Anderson turned into a Mental case after that 4 free them misses.
So Orlando get to have “what ifs” but the Bulls don’t :sadbron:
 

fifth column

Superstar
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
12,690
Reputation
-546
Daps
21,634
Why do y'all lie so openly and think it should mean anything?

The difference between 1995 and 1996 was the Bulls adding Rodman and the Magic having five major injuries. MJ looked the exact same both years

Horace Grant in 1995: 18-11-2 on 65% shooting
Horace Grant in 1996: Rodman holds him to 0 points and 1 rebound before he's knocked out for the series just 28 minutes into Game 1. Rodman put up 13 points and 21 rebounds in the game while utterly dominating Grant.

Brian Shaw got knocked out in Game 2, Nick Anderson got knocked out in Game 3, Jon Koncak (Grant's replacement) played injured all series, and Penny was playing hurt too. Plus Nick Anderson had a permanent case of the yips after that choke-job in the 1995 Finals (shot just 31% FG, 20% 3pt, and 36% FT for the series).



Meanwhile, what was the vast improvement in MJ that you claim decided the series?

MJ against Orlando in 1995: 31-7-4 on 48% shooting
MJ against Orlando in 1996: 30-6-5 on 52% shooting


Y'all just LIE every day on here. :mjlol:
The difference between 1995 and 1996 is MJ returning from baseball late in the NBA season and out of basketball shape:camby:
 

ReturnOfJudah

Veteran
Joined
Nov 25, 2014
Messages
34,910
Reputation
-723
Daps
106,796
Kobe looked up to Penny. Kobe asked Penny should he go pro and Penny kinda shined on him cuz he didnt know who he was. And that was all Kobe needed to add fuel to his fire. Penny knew it but wasnt tripping because it never hated Kobe
 

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,310
Reputation
2,281
Daps
52,589
Reppin
NULL
Y'all love quoting Shaq because he says stupid shyt on a daily basis just to get attention.

MJ in the 1st round in 1995 averaged
32-7-6 on 50% shooting.
MJ in the 2nd round in 1995 averaged 31-7-4 on 48% shooting.


He didn't have back-to-back series that good again for the entire rest of his playing career. They lost in 1995 because they had no rebounding or interior defense after losing Horace Grant. Same reason they had been struggling a bit in the regular season after winning 55 games the previous year. Once they picked up Rodman in the summer, they were fine. That's why Phil and MJ were willing to take the flier on a head case.

If we're supposed to believe you, the Bulls didn't need to risk fukking up team chemistry with Rodman because they already had the title in the bag once MJ got a full season in.
im not choosing a coli poster over someone who can directly compare the 95 version of MJ and the 96 version of MJ beause he played against him 2 years straight in ds playoffs lol
 

Harry B

Superstar
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
30,159
Reputation
-1,479
Daps
60,245
im not choosing a coli poster over someone who can directly compare the 95 version of MJ and the 96 version of MJ beause he played against him 2 years straight in ds playoffs lol
I never know if people are trolling with this “he played” thing. People who played have different takes and opinions, you just choose what fits your opinion.
 

seemorecizzy

Superstar
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,310
Reputation
2,281
Daps
52,589
Reppin
NULL
I never know if people are trolling with this “he played” thing. People who played have different takes and opinions, you just choose what fits your opinion.
its not even about him generally playing the game of basketball lol its about him playing in a series against a specific player in 1995, and then playing him in a series again in 96 lol. He also experieced how MJ played before his retirement.

He can make a direct comparison and he said Mj wasnt the same. Which takes away from shaq's accomplishments if anything. His words hold more weight then a coli poster in this situation
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,477
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,837
Reppin
NULL



:patrice:

Shaq is one precarious dude. The stuff this dude be saying sometimes is just:snoop:

I know Penny was a more efficient player...definitely a better playmaker. I could see how he was probably more fun for Shaq to play with. But to say he was “just as good”:why:

Penny was never as dominant as Kobe was. At his peak he was a 21/8/7 guy

At Kobe’s peak he was a 30/5/6 guy


That’s a big difference. Don’t get Shaq sometimes...


I hate when people blurt out a personal opinion and then proceed with a discussion as though it's an acknowledged, indisputable fact.

"You sayin' Penny could've been a top 3 player of all time cause that's what Kobe is..." :snoop:
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,101
Reputation
11,545
Daps
367,654
Reppin
CHICAGO
I've always said Penny and Grant Hill's injuries opened the door for Kobe to become the "face of the NBA"

If they didn't have those injuries, Kobe's light would have definitely been dimmed


KOBE NEVER BECAME
THE FACE OF THE NBA THOUGH.

COLORADO MADE SURE OF THAT.

:devil:
:evil:

 
Top