WHY ARE YOU MENTIONING WINNING
WHEN JOKIC HAS ONE RING?
JOKIC HASNT MADE ONE CONFERENCE FINALS
IN HIS 3 MVP SEASONS...
SO IS HE DOMINATING?
Because winning championships is relevant to the premise of this thread.
From 94-99 Shaq got swept five times.
5 times. That's nearly every year he made the playoffs in the 90s it ended in him being swept.
So is he still dominating?
SHAQS FINALS RUN IN 95>>>
JOKIC TITLE RUN
Past the fact that 99% of the time a Title run will be greater than a Finals run when comparing legacies, this is par for the course that is your gimmick. You're only stating this because he beat your mans, as if that somehow transcends winning a championship.
Funnily enough, this was another season that Shaq's postseason ended in getting swept, and yet somehow you want us to believe that it was a better run than Jokic who dominated every game from start to end, completely destroying every player and team in his path, with nobody else even remotely on his level during those playoffs.
Yet somehow the guy who ended up getting swept, not even winning a title had a better run.