Nah….
This right here
Ai proves it to me….
and trump being president
So you think Eve had sex with a “subtle beast”, was impregnated by this non-human animal— not even a mammal, and gave birth to a fully human son, Cain?Respectfully, I disagree. Especially the second point.. the serpent was turned into a snake after the fact. He was a subtle beast before that. Also we’re not in a spritual battle with snakes that roam so that does not make sense to me.
The serpents offspring(Cain) did have enmity with Eve’s(Abel) thus he was banished from the land after.
Where did Cain go & how did he find his wife that bore Enoch if Adam & Eve were the only humans around at that point?
if you consider my interpretation: that the serpent represents the tongue (or nun and lamedh....natural log....moses spied an "egyptian" smiting a hebrew...)Respectfully, I disagree. Especially the second point.. the serpent was turned into a snake after the fact. He was a subtle beast before that. Also we’re not in a spritual battle with snakes that roam so that does not make sense to me.
The serpents offspring(Cain) did have enmity with Eve’s(Abel) thus he was banished from the land after.
Where did Cain go & how did he find his wife that bore Enoch if Adam & Eve were the only humans around at that point?
Ha! I had a friend growing up whose parrot, Sh'raga (Aramaic for a ‘candle’; it was born around Hanukkah), could recite the opening five words of the Mishnah: מֵאֵימָתַי קוֹרִין אֶת שְׁמַע בָּעֲרָבִית? The grandfather Z.Tz.L was always engaged in Torah-study and that’s who it picked it up from. It even had the ‘gulped’ ע `ayin and ‘emphatic’ ט ṭet down pat!if you consider my interpretation: that the serpent represents the tongue (or nun and lamedh....natural log....moses spied an "egyptian" smiting a hebrew...)
Nun (letter) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Lamedh - Wikipedia
it purposefully puts a shield between man and woman from an unseen idea
"one flesh" can also be interpreted as eater and eaten (beasts)
and God did say that he would bring animals to the man to see what he would name them
so "Cain" could represent the first archetype after Adam. A being that makes offerings of earth and the second being after Adam, Abel a being who offers his firstlings (could be interpreted as seed)
if both are like serpents the visual is completely different. There are some ideas that Noah is the actual first person whereas everyone before him could have been some type of animal. Thats why the fear of Ham, Shem and Japeth would be on every living thing that left the ark
cause as far as we know animals dont read or write, or rehearse oral torah @Koichos
Huh? The nahash did not father Ḳayin who, in any case, had already been born by this point.
The tense of the two verbs יׇדַע yada` and וַתַּהַר vattahar is past perfect: ‘had slept with’ and ‘had become pregnant’—these events took place before the events of chapter 3.
using the perfect tense וַיֵּדַע vayyeda`, as it does in verse 25.
The word used here in B'reshyt 3:15 for ‘seed’ (זֶרַע zera`) is a shem kibbutzi or ‘collective noun’ that denotes the totality of one’s descendants for all time, considered together as a group; offspring. This reading is supported by Onḳ'los’s ancient Targum (the officially recognized targum or ‘translation’ of the Torah still in use in prayer-houses today), which translates the words זַרְעֲךָ zar`acha (‘your zera`’) and זַרְעָהּ zar`aH (‘her zera`’) using the Aramaic בֵּינָךְ beinach (‘your descendants’) and בְּנָךְ b'nach (‘her descendants’).
The verb ‘to know’ (לָדַעַת lada`at) is a euphemism for sex when used in its transitive form with a person as the direct object.
This is the same verb that occurs in verse 25 above.
The passage explains why it is that Man has an innate abhorrence of snakes.
Why should no other humans have existed? The text in B'reshyt 1:27b says זָכָ֥ר וּנְקֵבָ֖ה בָּרָ֥א אֹתָֽם ‘...He created them males and females’ and B'reshyt 5:2b says similarly זָכָ֥ר וּנְקֵבָ֖ה בְּרָאָ֑ם ‘Males and females He created them...’ which means that there were in fact other humans; otherwise, Ḳayin’s last four words of B'reshyt 4:14 (וְהָיָ֥ה כׇל־מֹֽצְאִ֖י יַֽהַרְגֵֽנִי ‘it will be that anyone who finds me will kill me’) would make no sense at all.Where did Cain go & how did he find his wife that bore Enoch if Adam & Eve were the only humans around at that point?
Maybe he’ll listen to you
other cultures do not have the same definition of "deity" or "God"i don't have a problem with hoping there's a heaven, following jesus' example, etc, but at the end of the day, it's like goddamn
how can you look at human history, with two thousand different gods being worshipped, and not connect the pattern that it's just humanity's hope that there's something up there? if 1 religion is true, then the other 2,000 were all fake and made up. so it's exceedingly likely that all 2001 were made up
