u r objectively wrongbecause it was fine before hand imo
u r objectively wrongbecause it was fine before hand imo
dean is right. We had the chance. But we have bytch-ass corporate blue-dog dems.almost had public option
ofcourse the overall effect was lost when the "activist judges" on the supreme court decided the medicare expansion was optional
but honestly i would have liked to see what would have happened if the penalties were more punative [with the exsisting exemptions]
higher participation
specifically younger and healthier participation
=
lower costs for everyone
[with the ACA caps on insurance comp profits
and executive compensation,
minimum outlay for actual patient benefit,
increased wellness/ regular checkups,
earlier and less costly detection of illness and issues,
less expensive treatment]
overall the blueprint was pretty damn solid
ofc he cant try and sell it. Dude has no fukking Idea what is in the bill.
ofc he cant try and sell it. Dude has no fukking Idea.
He just speaks vaguely every time he talks about anything
I don't understand the people who vote for guys like Rand paul who doesn't seem to give a fukk about actual people.no prob. yeah some people with childish logic. i would love to not have to pay car insurance premiums that i've gone 6+ years so far without making a claim, but it doesn't work like that. they want all those "good" parts of obamacare, but don't want the costs involved. funny thing is it's usually conservatives talking about how people want something for nothing.
at least i use my health insurance with the doc visits and shyt, fukking car insurance.
engage or learn? the audacityNotice that the disingenuous troll never came back after everyone explained his basic coverage. The few trumpset in here are definitely trolls and not trying to engage or learn. fukk em
engage or learn? the audacity
yall dont believe my personal experiences wtf you want me to do?
cape for a plan that congress men and women dont even use bruhs