"Seawater touching your puzzy is adultery" and other fatwas about women--Al Azhar University report

[Ikwa]

lol...stfu. You embarrassed yourself. All you said is you don't want to believe a comprehensive published study by Al Azhar University because you're insecure about it embarrassing your religion. Go to bed.

Do you realise that Al Azhar hasn't been a respected institutions for decades? They been in bed with the military since Mubarak, you best believe that nobody is believing those ducktales in Egypt.

The main MB leaders been put in jail since the coup, military told Al Yom newspaper to bring out a duck story from a previously respected religious institution.

Cotdamn that shyt ia basic level politics like I said but you couldn't understand such a simple concept

 

[Broke Wave]

Muslims winning in this thread

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

You find people to this day that dispute that the Earth is round. That doesn't mean "there is dispute" on a basis of adherence to factual reality. I said there is near universal agreement among historians and scholars that was 9 when they had sex. That is a fact. If it makes you uncomfortable I don't know what to tell you.

While I like your comparison and it holds true for a lot of things... there is no universal agreement among historians bruh... that's what I was contesting the first time so I don't know why you chose that as your answer. There's no way to prove when the man first consummated his marriage or even got married to her that doesn't involve using the Hadith and Sunnah .... nice claim but dubious at best.

 

[Poitier]

Muslims winning in this thread

Let's look at their women and children's death toll via military action this past year and compare

 

[Ikwa]

Do you know what you're talking about? I think we killed 100 of your compadres today by simple drone strike. Childs play.

Nikka your using the white as your saviour, the same man that put you in shackles for centuries and trynna brag about it when they drop bombs on villagers that's the definition of a c00n right there but stay furious at how Prophet Mohammed crushed them buildings back in the 600s

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

These dudes are some straight trolls on higher learning..they've never studied any part of history but when ever a thread about religion comes up they link propaganda articles..

No idiot, I won't link propaganda articles, I'll link Aisha's words herself in the hadith.

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234

The Prophet engaged me when I was a girl of six (years). We went to Medina and stayed at the home of Bani-al-Harith bin Khazraj. Then I got ill and my hair fell down. Later on my hair grew (again) and my mother, Um Ruman, came to me while I was playing in a swing with some of my girl friends. She called me, and I went to her, not knowing what she wanted to do to me. She caught me by the hand and made me stand at the door of the house. I was breathless then, and when my breathing became Allright, she took some water and rubbed my face and head with it. Then she took me into the house. There in the house I saw some Ansari women who said, "Best wishes and Allah's Blessing and a good luck." Then she entrusted me to them and they prepared me (for the marriage). Unexpectedly Allah's Apostle came to me in the forenoon and my mother handed me over to him, and at that time I was a girl of nine years of age.

It is commonly accepted among scholars and historians that Aisha was 9. If you had proof that disputes that, you could present it. But since you don't, you won't.

It's not like child marriage wasn't commonplace in that region of the world in the 7th century. Just say it makes you uncomfortable to believe.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Ok I see that you're just not good at this... you posted a link about women around the world being stoned to death TODAY in modern times to disprove that stoning has been around before ISLAM.... nice

5. So, stoning is religiously justified?
Although Islam and Muslim codes of law are often used to justify the use of stoning as a punishment for adultery, there is actually no reference to stoning in the Koran. Furthermore, there are many prominent clerics and religious scholars who openly oppose the practice of stoning and have called it "Islamically unjustifiable." For example, Grand Ayatollah Yousef Sanei, a very prominent Shi’a cleric in Iran, issued a fatwa (a religious edict) against the practice of stoning.

This is from your own source you dikkbag



I get legitimacy from the Quran itself... if it's shown to have been translated wrong I will gladly adopt the most correct translation accordingly, it's the right thing to do. You can criticize Islam if you want, that's your right but you'd criticize it regardless of which translation it is. Ain't no bait and switch, I know not everyone interprets the religion tthe same.... but the Quran is the Quran... i know when people are following it or following something from the hadith.... The Quran is not a large book. If anyone is guilty of bait n switch it's you... just scroll up a bit .

I see we can't read the quran at face value then...

do you want me to start quoting the quran?

We can do that if you'd like.

 

[Poitier]

Nikka your using the white as your saviour, the same man that put you in shackles for centuries and trynna brag about it when they drop bombs on villagers that's the definition of a c00n right there but stay furious at how Prophet Mohammed crushed them buildings back in the 600s

The enemy of my enemy is my enemy

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

Do you realise that Al Azhar hasn't been a respected institutions for decades? They been in bed with the military since Mubarak, you best believe that nobody is believing those ducktales in Egypt.

The main MB leaders been put in jail since the coup, military told Al Yom newspaper to bring out a duck story from a previously respected religious institution.

Cotdamn that shyt ia basic level politics like I said but you couldn't understand such a simple concept

lol...the NYT is in bed with the military. So therefore, the report they made about increased activity at North Korea's main underground nuclear testing site is bogus because I said so.


You can do this with literally anything. You're an idiot, lol.

 

[Ikwa]

The enemy of my enemy is my enemy

It's supposed to be the enemy of my enemy is my friend you smart dumb nikka :mjkkk:

You better get your master to proof read your c00n postings from now on :mjkkk:

 

[Broke Wave]

Let's look at their women and children's death toll via military action this past year and compare

We have the moral high ground though

@Mephistopheles my goons are on your ass

You out here in the field with some rookies

You need to tag in some of the old anti islam brigade to entice my apologetics

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

No idiot, I won't link propaganda articles, I'll link Aisha's words herself in the hadith.

Bukhari Volume 5, Book 58, Number 234



It is commonly accepted among scholars and historians that Aisha was 9. If you had proof that disputes that, you could present. But since you don't, you won't.

Hadith isn't proof of anything... you have hadith that contradict one another that's why it's bullshyt. This is why the Quran speaks ill of any Hadith and rejects it . People who beleive in Hadith are going against the Quran.

Why do you think I said there's no way to prove he consumated his marriage with her at the time? Aisha was also said to have been vehemtly against the creation of Hadiths and so was Mohammed... The Hadiths were even banned from the region and Abu hurayra, who had his own collection of Hadith was threatened with exile..

I could go on about this topic for days

 

[Poitier]

It's supposed to be the enemy of my enemy is my friend you smart dumb nikka :mjkkk:

You better get your master to proof read your c00n postings from now on :mjkkk:

No, that's definitely what I meant to say

 

[Chesirecatdaddy]

I see we can't read the quran at face value then...

do you want me to start quoting the quran?

We can do that if you'd like.

we've done that before and I shytted all over you like my pamper was overflowing.

 

[Dusty Bake Activate]

While I like your comparison and it holds true for a lot of things... there is no universal agreement among historians bruh... that's what I was contesting the first time so I don't know why you chose that as your answer. There's no way to prove when the man first consummated his marriage or even got married to her that doesn't involve using the Hadith and Sunnah .... nice claim but dubious at best.

That's why I said NEAR universal. So if your point is it is widely accepted among a near consensus of historians and scholars, and according to Aisha's account in the Hadith, but none of us were there at the moment Muhammad first fukked her, so we can't be 100% sure, so be it. I fail to see the relevance of that though.

And you dapped a post of a dude saying she was a teenager, even though there's no reason to believe that.