Science eventually leads back to God

[EBK String]

If you study the origins of the universe you will eventually reach the time before the big bang where they was nothingness. It is logically impossible for something ti come from nothing so there had to be a first mover that brougut the first particles into existence.

If you study evolutionn, you will eventually reach the complexity of molecular biology and the theory that it is driven by natural genetic engineering of a cellular intelligence. Where does this intelligence come from?

How did the first life spring into being from the inanimate material of the universe?

People delude themselves thinking that human observation of the universe can ever replace their creator.

 

[Thegospel]

Most of the coli doesn't believe in God.

 

[Matt504]

It is logically impossible for something ti come from nothing so there had to be a first mover that brougut the first particles into existence.

if it is logically impossible for something to come from nothing, how do you conclude that there had to be a "first mover"

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

If you study the origins of the universe you will eventually reach the time before the big bang where they was nothingness. It is logically impossible for something ti come from nothing so there had to be a first mover that brougut the first particles into existence.

If you study evolutionn, you will eventually reach the complexity of molecular biology and the theory that it is driven by natural genetic engineering of a cellular intelligence. Where does this intelligence come from?

How did the first life spring into being from the inanimate material of the universe?

People delude themselves thinking that human observation of the universe can ever replace their creator.

Just going by what you are saying; what came before God?

 

[EBK String]

if it is logically impossible for something to come from nothing, how do you conclude that there had to be a "first mover"

Because nothing can come from something the universe had to have a pre existing origin. If you argue that the universe comes from an older universe that was destroyed then you will go down a never ending line of pre existing universes which is logically impossible.

Eventually there had to be a creator that has no beginning to be logically sound.

 

[EBK String]

Just going by what you are saying; what came before God?

Because nothing can come from something the universe had to have a pre existing origin. If you argue that the universe comes from an older universe that was destroyed then you will go down a never ending line of pre existing universes which is logically impossible.

Eventually there had to be a creator that has no beginning to be logically sound.

God always existed. Time is one of his creations in this universe.

 

[Sex Luthor]

Most of the coli doesn't believe in God.

God doesn't believe in most of the coli either

 

[Luke Cage]

Nah, i going with Aliens.

 

[EBK String]

Nah, i going with Aliens.

Who created the Aliens unless they are eternal. Anything other than an eternal non created God creates a paradox.

 

[Thegospel]

God doesn't believe in most of the coli either

Nah that ain't true.

 

[Sex Luthor]

Nah that ain't true.

How do you know?

 

[At30wecashout]

“I dont understand this, therefore God.”

 

[Matt504]

Because nothing can come from something the universe had to have a pre existing origin. If you argue that the universe comes from an older universe that was destroyed then you will go down a never ending line of pre existing universes which is logically impossible.

Eventually there had to be a creator that has no beginning to be logically sound.

You're arguing against your own logic when you suggest that there must have been a creator with no beginning.

At some point there was nothing and at some later point, there was something. The idea that something can't come from nothing has a very obvious flaw.

 

[Won Won]

Kill your own position in the 2nd sentence, pandering brehs

 

[acri1]

Science doesn't actually say the big bang came from "nothing" though.

It just says the universe was much hotter and denser the further back you go in the past (which there's very good evidence of) and if you go back far enough everything was compressed into an extremely tiny space smaller than an atom.


But when you go back far enough it's so hot and dense that that currently known laws of physics break down, so we just don't know what was going on before that or how it got to be that way.