muzikfrk75
#4080
I rocked with jay
Cold Pizza
I rocked with jay
Because it cost too much. They lost 12 million subscribers over 5 years. each of those people were paying on average 7-8 a month for their service. Billions lost because subscribers are dropping their service and as time goes on it'll get worse.Why should they do this when this is the main reason people watch ESPN in the first place
Yahoo won't buy them nor will any other internet company for that matter. The only internet company that would buy them is Apple, but I think Apple would buy Disney out right and not just ESPN. Fox is looking for content, plus ESPN is still a strong brand with value, you just have to give credit to the NCAA, MLB, NFL, and NBA on negotiate good contracts.What would fox gain? terrible contracts that if ESPN went under they might be able to get at a cheaper price? Redundent infrastructure they already have built?
Only company I could buying them would be a internet company like yahoo, which isn't touching it or google/hulu/netflix
Hopefully Danny Kanell gets cut.
but theres not enough people watching say the nba to make up the difference of literally everyone watching cable tv subsidizing the league by giving companies like espn/turner billions for them to give the nba and not watching a second of the product. tailoring ads to the microscopic set of fans who care enough to order season long nba league passes wont make up that earnings gap, and it wont even be close. 100 million folks had cable a few years back. 87 million have espn right now. how many league passes would amazon/facebook.youtube sell combined? few million tops? probably less. right now 87 million people pay to watch the nba, and only a couple million usually do on a nightly basisI actually think they'll make just as much money (or more) going to streaming platforms....the amount of data amazon (prime), google (youtube), and Facebook have on their users is immense. The advertising dollars spent there will have such a higher ROI, companies would love this - stop wasting time advertising to people who don't care. When I watch the nfl now, I see companies using sexy women to sell shyt i don't care about - trucks, beer, power tools, cheeseburgers, wranglers . This current model can't account for the female viewer or vegan or new parent watching, yet if I'm a prime member and watch on amazon - they know damn near everything i buy, browse, add to wish lists, etc. That tailored ad experience is better for customers and advertisers. The value of that alone will help keep the cost of rights inflated. Let alone any subscription fee they might charge for access to games
Disney got no reason to sell outright, but yeah I could see Disney packaging ESPN to apple that would work and it would give Apple the content they want.Yahoo won't buy them nor will any other internet company for that matter. The only internet company that would buy them is Apple, but I think Apple would buy Disney out right and not just ESPN. Fox is looking for content, plus ESPN is still a strong brand with value, you just have to give credit to the NCAA, MLB, NFL, and NBA on negotiate good contracts.
but I think Apple would buy Disney out right
NBA and NFL players need to brace for the drop in salary cap due to the lack of money from TV deals.
NFL player really need to be prepping, but knowing them they'll be unprepared, strike and come back begging or take the first deal presented because rent is due.
Nah, she's still there. He role will be reduced though:They let Hannah Storm go
Breh, most of them won't be selling league passes, it will be the broadcast model, you got an account on the platform, you're all good. AD dollars are how broadcast stations make money on what they paid to air games, it will be the same for these online properties except advertisers will pay more per spot (even if buying fewer spots) because of how targeted their spend will be.but theres not enough people watching say the nba to make up the difference of literally everyone watching cable tv subsidizing the league by giving companies like espn/turner billions for them to give the nba and not watching a second of the product. tailoring ads to the microscopic set of fans who care enough to order season long nba league passes wont make up that earnings gap, and it wont even be close. 100 million folks had cable a few years back. 87 million have espn right now. how many league passes would amazon/facebook.youtube sell combined? few million tops? probably less. right now 87 million people pay to watch the nba, and only a couple million usually do on a nightly basis
Chris Berman fat ass retired just in time....
Those Cacs at barstool been on that...Soooooooo many people on twitter pissed that the black on air personalities werent axed (Mike, Jemelle, Stephen and Bomani) and saying this is because ESPN promotes left leaning politics.
The across twitter with people like Barstool Sports and Clay Travis trying to give hot takes
NBA is a global sport so they have that going for them, unlike the NFLNBA ate off the traditional tv is dead cuz of pvrs and streaming but not sports lie
NBA players gonna be making NHl money next tv deal