Sanctuary Cities.. i dont get it

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,598
Reputation
20,130
Daps
227,922
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
And sanctuary cities don't really exist.

Just a boogyman created by the GOP. In reality no city can harbor illegals
If this is true then i think the Dems need to re format their arguments. Because they make it sound exactly like that. Or dont let the GOP paint them in that way without a rebuttal.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
102,485
Reputation
13,651
Daps
299,356
Reppin
NULL
man you lean right wing :stopitslime:.

anyway when you say use federal money what do you mean? did the federal govt generate that money on their own? or does a state like new york send more money to the federal govt than they get back in return? it's one thing to threaten useless taker states (funny most of them are red and they hate takers), it's another to threaten donor states.

and you probably shouldn't care either way. but it never ends there because you all end up caring about one particular way and in this case it's usually on the side of racists. these cities want to keep things rolling along and they feel gestapo tactics aren't good for state business and safety. why fukk with their economy? you right wingers like to talk about freedom when it's red states discriminating against people, but these blue state govts are supported by big majorities in their state and they don't seem to have a problem with it. the basic tenant of a sanctuary city is that the police shouldn't be asking about a person's legal status before they provide service. if ICE wants someone they can go get them. they are CHOOSING to not use their resources to enforce federal law, basically conscientiously objecting.

finally and most importantly this is protected by the 10th amendment. equal protection applies to everyone in the country, not just citizens, so states and municipalities can't deny services to anyone regardless of immigration status. so these cities are actually behaving lawfully.
:dead: these cocksuckers like rahm emanuel care about VOTES. nothing else

how many american children in chicago go without, as this dude is declaring he needs to take care of and protect people who are here illegally :what:how can he take that fukkin position before every citizen is taken care of and protected?
 

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,598
Reputation
20,130
Daps
227,922
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
NYC uses it's own money because without ILLEGAL Mexicans and Central Americans the entire city would collapse over night.
Somebody else said this to me and when i really thought about it I had to agree. They said Cali and NYC uses its own money.

To that point i say if the state population agrees then who am i to argue. But it still goes back to my other point. Should we be harboring illegals ( of any race ) i am conflicted on this to be honest. I get the sob stories. I am just not particulary moved by them.

I look at it like.. if you are illegal you know the risk. If you can finess the system and stay then why not. Should the system be knowingly helping you finess?? There for me it gets tricky.
 

GnauzBookOfRhymes

Superstar
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
12,502
Reputation
2,832
Daps
47,887
Reppin
NULL
Most of these are cities with large Hispanic populations (legal and illegal). In a city like Chicago for instance, the Hispanic voting bloc is massive. Thus the Democratic Party can't be seen as cozying up to Trump. The idea that they are using up a ton of money to provide "sanctuary" for illegal immigrants is fukking stupid. Illegal immigrants are a huge part of the economy and contribute way more than whatever amount may be directed towards them in social services etc.
 

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,598
Reputation
20,130
Daps
227,922
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
Maybe I'm exaggerating but who the hell wants to pay 6 bucks a apple?
I hear you fam. If Trump had his way and somehow booted all illegals out.

We would need to revamp the agriculture business somehow. Some foods will be expensive as hell.

That then brings up the question.. does the system need to be revamped regardless? Because if it cant stand up without illegal cheap labor then its a problem right?
 

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,598
Reputation
20,130
Daps
227,922
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
:stopitslime: what large farms are there in Chicago, LA or NYC
When i said that i did not mean it was monolothic to every sanctuary cities situation. Chi and NYC i dont think that applies. I was always under the impression that Cali has a large agriculture base for illegals though
 

The Fukin Prophecy

RIP Champ
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
24,410
Reputation
5,705
Daps
95,928
NYC uses it's own money because without ILLEGAL Mexicans and Central Americans the entire city would collapse over night.
LoL @ this is bullshyt...

First off NYC uses my money (NY state tax payer) to harbor illegals...We get raped by taxes for living in the 5 boroughs...If you just work in NYC you get bent over to...

The only industry that would be seriously impacted from cutting off illegals in NYC is the restaurant business...Thats the main industry in the city that has an actual use for uneducated cheap labor...Illegals also work construction but that would just mean these fat lazy greaseball union fukkbois would actually have to work now...

Nothing would collapse...
 
Top