606onit
Superstar
Basing a hypothesis off of something that you have seen NOT WORK under similar conditions = being a wannabe lawyer
Niccas is stupid man.
Niccas is stupid man.
Lies. You try hard lame.If you care about black people, why do you support the reckless use of prosecution for charges that won't even stick?
There is no evidence of him fighting the officer. BFact. We aren't defending a criminal. Fact. We are defending his right to live. Fact. Running and being wanted for child support are not reasons to taze or murder or harm someone at all. Fact. They had his ID and car. Fact. He panicked and ran. Which obviously with the climate in America isn't smart. Fact. But that isn't the issue. The issue is the use of deadly force on an unarmed non threatening man. Period. Demonizing him is for cowards. Period. It doesn't matter why he ran. We will never know. What matters is that police are killing non threatening people that are disproportionately black and it's not ending in justice. Fact.
Dude saying Scott fought the officer now.
No evidence of that.
Answer the question.Lies. You try hard lame.
Its by design.guess who looks crazy and irate in this segment, (hint, it's not the person who's actually crazy)
If first degree doesn't stick they gotta get him with something. People can't take these cops getting off scotfree over and over. shyt sucks so much.I agree. They had his PLATES, PRINTS, all that. He did not have to shoot that dude so basically they just need to charge him with a crime that will STICK. I dunno if 1st degree will stick.
Michael Dunn wasn't:that's your big concern isn't it?
gattdamn it I am a pro at this
Hey Coli this is what the media does
they need views so they create controversial stories
Answer the question.
Why are ya'll being fooled by stronger and harder to prove charges?
Do you not realize how this shyt plays out?
If he's found NOT GUILTY on a stronger charge, he goes free...not that he gets knocked to a lesser one.
I JUST went over this.what was Michael Dunn convicted of?
debatable. Not running hasn't proven to be very effective in stopping cops from shooting people in the back either.There is no evidence of him fighting the officer. BFact. We aren't defending a criminal. Fact. We are defending his right to live. Fact. Running and being wanted for child support are not reasons to taze or murder or harm someone at all. Fact. They had his ID and car. Fact. He panicked and ran. Which obviously with the climate in America isn't smart. Fact. But that isn't the issue. The issue is the use of deadly force on an unarmed non threatening man. Period. Demonizing him is for cowards. Period. It doesn't matter why he ran. We will never know. What matters is that police are killing non threatening people that are disproportionately black and it's not ending in justice. Fact.
No, he said he saw the officer have control. Never did he say they fought.False.
Feidin Santana said he saw this before he started recording.
I'm not going to argue this. Go listen to his interviews.No, he said he saw the officer have control. Never did he say they fought.
True. Man its really crap shoot when it comes to these pigs.debatable. Not running hasn't proven to be very effective in stopping cops from shooting people in the back either.
Provide similar cases that had no media attention and Rev Al was not involved, that resulted in a guilty verdictit's wild how people don't get this, but totally understandable because these are the same people saying silly, ignorant shyt like "why y'all concerned about what white people think" when these white people are controlling the media and narrative.