NZA
LOL
of all the rhetoric i type in here, how much of it seems like it comes from FOX?Yep. I see we both keep our channels on the new real news, FOX
of all the rhetoric i type in here, how much of it seems like it comes from FOX?Yep. I see we both keep our channels on the new real news, FOX
it's not real time. it can be anywhere from 1 month to 3 years old.Somebody educate a breh who isn't in the know. How do I see things in real-time on Google maps?
it's not real time. it can be anywhere from 1 month to 3 years old.
What happened to them give me a rundown.
That's what I always thought. So what are they talking about in that article? How can they be revealing movement of troops if the data is months behind?
Not so much movements just the bases themselves which will always be there and show what’s on them.
It makes it easier for someone far away, using grids to adjust fires. The only other option would be drones or getting close enough to physically observe and guide rounds on target with grids or polar adjustments.
By knowing how a base is oriented, and where certain things are parked, you can adjust on specific places or pre plot targets instead of trying to randomly pound a big chunk out of a grid square and hope for the best.
the article is claiming that this will help "open source intelligence analysts" calculate russian losses because some of these satellite images show military vehicles. the estimates of russian armor and aircraft losses that have been posted in here by people like napoleon are usually coming from these OSINT twitter accounts that use stuff from multiple internet sources to make claims. this has nothing to do with movements or any other time sensitive information. it is all after the fact, so they will get pics of a destroyed tank with a z on it in a particular city and then they will find a pic of a happy russian soldier sitting on the tank with a z on a road to that city, and then they will use some kind of distinct markings or something to then claim that particular tank is the same one in several photos. when they create a profile of individual destroyed vehicles, they add them up and come up with a number estimating russian losses. those photos show the types and number of airplanes can be at that base and some of those specific ones may have been shot down since the war started. if there are pics of the wreckage, these OSINT people can try to do some internet sleuthing to prove that is the one in the google satellite photo.That's what I always thought. So what are they talking about in that article? How can they be revealing movement of troops if the data is months behind?
the article is claiming that this will help "open source intelligence analysts" calculate russian losses because some of these satellite images show military vehicles. the estimates of russian armor and aircraft losses that have been posted in here by people like napoleon are usually coming from these OSINT twitter accounts that use stuff from multiple internet sources to make claims. this has nothing to do with movements or any other time sensitive information. it is all after the fact, so they will get pics of a destroyed tank with a z on it in a particular city and then they will find a pic of a happy russian soldier sitting on the tank with a z on a road to that city, and then they will use some kind of distinct markings or something to then claim that particular tank is the same one in several photos. when they create a profile of individual destroyed vehicles, they add them up and come up with a number estimating russian losses. those photos show the types and number of airplanes can be at that base and some of those specific ones may have been shot down since the war started. if there are pics of the wreckage, these OSINT people can try to do some internet sleuthing to prove that is the one in the google satellite photo.
this all seems to have more propaganda and journalism value than military value, but as 987654321 said, you can use the layout to better attack with artillery or even help plan a spec ops mission.
"Super-soldier"?