Russia's Invasion of Ukraine (Official Thread)

Brehcepticon

Adeptus Brehstartes
Supporter
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
8,534
Reputation
6,761
Daps
43,018
Damn Imagine you think you made it outta there clean getaway style and 30 mins after takeoff you find out Putin got the plane turning around
full
full
full
We'll all go together when we go :demonic:
 

Arianne Martell

"Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken"
Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
6,922
Reputation
942
Daps
23,683
Reppin
House Martell #SnakeGang #Targset
If they capture Zelensky, he's being publicly executed, been saying that all along... they'll hang him from the top of the gov't building for all the people and camera's to see
If they catch him alive…I think he would off himself first…b/c he wouldn’t want to put his family through that.
 

Arianne Martell

"Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken"
Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
6,922
Reputation
942
Daps
23,683
Reppin
House Martell #SnakeGang #Targset
It's possible they could do that, but if I'm Russia--and I'm obviously not, nor have any insight into how they think or what they'd do--you'd want to capture him alive. Put him in a cush penthouse in Siberia or something, cut off from the world but alive.

A dead, publicly-executed Zelensky is a martyr. And I don't mean some rinky-dink domestic political prisoner, I'm talking about a folk hero that would stand as an example for generations of Ukrainians and other people who hate Russians, stand for even centuries; a William the Silent, an El Cid, a Constantine XI...short term satisfaction in exchange for a long term problem.

but look how the US did Bin Laden, they threw him in the sea so there is no mark or shrine to worship him or whatever they do. Russians can do that as well.
 
Last edited:

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,271
Reppin
The Deep State

Thread by @FPRI_Orbis on Thread Reader App

Since @RadioFreeTom tagged me in a post on Cold War history, and he has been having spirited debates on his feed about managing escalatory risks with Russia over Ukraine (the no-fly-zone won't lead to nuclear escalation argument), I thought I'd develop aon Cold War rules. 1/
And @RadioFreeTom, @20committee, @MinerPhD, @andrewfacini and others, feel free to jump on in. Starting premise: as restated by many senior U.S. officials, U.S.-Soviet confrontations could never rise to the level of open combat between U.S. and Soviet units. 2/
That, of course, did not mean "do nothing." The U.S. and Soviets would engage in proxy conflicts all over the world during the Cold War. But what happens if one side was directly engaged in hostilities? What were the "rules"? 3/
First step was covert provision of weapons. In the Afghan operation, step 1 was to find replacement weapons for the Afghans from their existing supplies, which meant WWI British Enfields, among others. We graduated to going to China, Yugoslavia, Egypt and Israel to either get 4/
existing stockpiles of Soviet weaponry or to buy weapons manufactured under Soviet license. This was to maintain the plausible fiction that the Afghans were taking weapons captured from the Soviets. In Latin America, Soviet-sponsored guerilla movements fighting against 5/
U.S. backed governments with American military advisors would receive shipments of U.S. equipment that had been captured in Vietnam. The next step was to escalate to provision of weapons that clearly could not be disguised as to their origins (e.g. Stingers to the mujihadeen).6/
But here too there were unwritten rules. The Soviets could not threaten escalation against the U.S. for Afghan weapons, but the U.S. could not threaten counter-escalation against Soviet efforts to sabotage the pipeline in Pakistan or to attack weapons shipments once they 7/
crossed into Afghanistan. The next step after that would be to embed advisors or support personnel. Covertly--as in pretending to be locals (feasible in some cases, harder in others). Or to try and carefully stress their non-combatant role. But this raised risks on both sides. 8/
When the U.S. directed air and naval gunfire into Lebanon in 1983, an ever-present concern would be if fire hit Syrian units that had embedded Soviet advisors--and what the Soviet reaction might be. 9/
The Korean war represented some of the most ambitious efforts to test the line of what might draw reactions. Decision of the Chinese to intervene (but with consequences falling on China, not the USSR, if that went wrong), use of KMT forces from Taiwan, undeclared and disguised10/
Soviet pilots flying North Korean aircraft. But that represented the outer limits of the rules set. It also imposed a set of what some commanders felt were artificialities. Why was Vladivostok (for the Soviets) or Japan (for the Americans) off limits to attack? Self-imposed 11/
limits. Tested in Vietnam and Nicaragua with the mining of harbors where Soviet ships could have been damaged, but otherwise these limits held. 12/
And, of course, the Cold War was fought in a pre-internet, pre-digital age, so managing the plausible deniability was a little easier. END
 
Top