The reason is clearly delineated from the first post in this thread.I have no fukking idea, doesn't mean I need to create a reason
I walk you through the transformation and connection of wikileaks in 2010.
The reason is clearly delineated from the first post in this thread.I have no fukking idea, doesn't mean I need to create a reason
why do you pretend that media organizations can't be primed to undercut american interests?your definition of proof is useless
so fukking what? I can find you somewhere on the Internet where it says otherwiseThe reason is clearly delineated from the first post in this thread.
................. you can't walk me through anythingI walk you through the transformation and connection of wikileaks in 2010.
whose American interest? joe public's?why do you pretend that media organizations can't be primed to undercut american interests?
I suggest you read about Phillip Agee:whose American interest? joe public's?
Actually, it doesn't.so fukking what? I can find you somewhere on the Internet where it says otherwise
................. you can't walk me through anything
again, look at what your concerns areStop putting Wikileaks and Assange on a pedestal.
no thanksI suggest you read about Phillip Agee:
So why do you ignore the history of outright propagandists who exploit your desire to shame the USA while collecting cheques from foreign intelligence services?no thanks
given how your mind works, I don't want the pollution of its creators
Just because someone comes to you with real information doesn't mean they're doing it to be benevolentagain, look at what your concerns are
very telling
reallyAmericas dominance has lulled many of you all into forgetting
So why do you ignore the history of outright propagandists
This is a comically weak strawmanJust because someone comes to you with real information doesn't mean they're doing it to be benevolent
The very freedom of speech and the ability to openly criticize government.really
what are we dominating in? child health? wealth equality? low incarceration rates? Education?
how did I miss this post
Imagine if you will a circle, but not a circle at the same time, we are all the circle and inside the circle is yet another circle but this circle has sides. Now Wikileaks is a jar of strawberry jelly...no grape jelly, yeah definitely grape jelly, when the grape jelly gets in the second circle closes to the one with the largest sides it's evident that it's motives are more like that of strawberry jelly...you fags?
?
-criticize them about what?The very freedom of speech and the ability to openly criticize government.
What's the point of having freedom to dissent if the facts we are to dissent about are hidden from us?leaks to seed dissent in the West