RUSSIA/РОССИЯ THREAD—ASSANGE CHRGD W/ SPYING—DJT IMPEACHED TWICE-US TREASURY SANCTS KILIMNIK AS RUSSIAN AGNT

Mantis Toboggan M.D.

Drink wolf cola
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
31,584
Reputation
9,601
Daps
106,469
Reppin
Brooklyn
What are the odds the public never sees the Mueller report ?

Zero.

There may be parts redacted that specific who/what was the exact source of the information but aside from that there’s no way. People will go crazy and someone will just leak it otherwise.
I agree. Parts to keep certain people safe will be hidden, but the depth of his treason needs to be exposed just for the sake of making sure there’s enough public support for impeachment and indictment.
 

Black Panther

Long Live The King
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
13,531
Reputation
10,118
Daps
70,654
Reppin
Wakanda
Maybe it’s cause I’m hungover, but I’m clearly missing something. Why is the NYT article important again?

Trump’s collision with Russia is already part of Mueller’s investigation?

i kinda agree.
aside from some details about when and whys the FBI started it's investigation into trump this is all known.

the day he brought those russians into the white house, revealed classified info that led to the exposure of
israeli intel and then he told them that he fired comey to relieve pressure from the russia investigation...that day right there told everybody what time it was.

A. It kills the talking point that Trump was never a subject or target of the investigation (meaning Double R lied to Trump to protect the investigation :RodSoleSurvivor: ).

B. The high bar needed to approve such an investigation requires strong compelling evidence, especially a counterintelligence investigation against the president.

The Feds might have been sitting on some yet-to-be-revealed SIGINT data. :muellerinduetime:

EDIT: Point C was referring to the article about Manafort passing polling info to Kilimnik, not the newly revealed investigation into Trump. My bad :cpagehubie:

C. This also might have something to do with these two articles from Sept./Oct. 2017, respectively:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...d975285475e_story.html?utm_term=.98890cea4f0d

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...f-paul-manafort-focuses-on-13-suspicious-wire
 
Last edited:

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
28,846
Reputation
5,058
Daps
126,755
Reppin
NULL
A. It kills the talking point that Trump was never a subject or target of the investigation (meaning Double R lied to Trump to protect the investigation :RodSoleSurvivor: ).

B. The high bar needed to approve such an investigation requires strong compelling evidence, especially a counterintelligence investigation against the president.

The Feds might have been sitting on some yet-to-be-revealed SIGINT data.
:muellerinduetime:

C. This also might have something to do with these two articles from Sept./Oct. 2017, respectively:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...d975285475e_story.html?utm_term=.98890cea4f0d

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...f-paul-manafort-focuses-on-13-suspicious-wire


Okay, I can see that being of value.
 
Top