firemanBk
The Manslayer
Knicks have their way outta that Julius Randle contract without having to move picks
![blessed :blessed: :blessed:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rejoice.png)
I know it's not actually happening that soon no need to correct
Knicks have their way outta that Julius Randle contract without having to move picks
The Raptors?On one hand adding teams is always fun and exciting but on the other hand I don't think we need further dilution of talent on teams when the Magic, Hornets, Kings, Thunder, Pistons, Raptors, Rockets, Knicks, Wizards, Pacers, and Spurs exist. I ain't bullshyttin, go look at those rosters right now and tell me we need more teams because of all the talent already in the league.
It doesn't make sense to add teams just for the hell of it. if the argument is that the league used to have 6 and grew to 29 in 30 years, then we need to realize that obviously the league needed more than 6 teams, but to continue to add 29 teams every 30 years would be nonsensical.
Breh I was about to say the same thing I want an expansion just so we can get out of that contract. I give a fukk whether it's good for the league or not.Leave Julius Randle unprotected … that is all
Yeah geographically NO and Memphis more on the east coast
They’d have to actually draft him though.Breh I was about to say the same thing I want an expansion just so we can get out of that contract. I give a fukk whether it's good for the league or not.
This is false.NBA already low on talent, would be awful
This is true, especially considering in a expansion situation there will be limited amount of players you can protect . People talking 10 is nutsThis is false.
No it’s not. This is the most talented it has ever been.NBA already low on talent, would be awful
NBA already low on talent, would be awful
This is false.
This is true, especially considering in a expansion situation there will be limited amount of players you can protect . People talking 10 is nuts![]()
The way I see it the NBA is high on talent, but low on bball IQ and fundamentals.No it’s not. This is the most talented it has ever been.
Why aren’t the Grizzlies in the east in your scenario if both teams added would be to the west?So the East would probably be:
Wolves
Bucks
Bulls
Pistons
Raptors
Celtics
Knicks
Nets
Wizards
Pacers
Philly
Cavs
Heat
Magic
Hawks
Hornets
The west would be a lot harder to call outside of Portland probably being in the new division. They should probably put the Kings in that new division too. Then they could have Lakers, Clippers, Warriors, and Suns.
A division of Utah, OKC, Denver, and the Grizzlies would be a bytch for the teams involved but would make it easier for everyone else.
I would legit be interested in how they break this all up.
apparently the way the math works only one team from the west needs to come to the east for them to have 16 teams. Plus the Wolves are far from the western teams, while NO, is close to all those teams in Texas and the Grizzlies are relatively close to OKC, just like the Jazz are relatively close to Denver. they would have a short trip for a least a third of their division games.Why aren’t the Grizzlies in the east in your scenario if both teams added would be to the west?