MooseMouthMthafuga
Veteran
This team is exceptional, and so are the Heat and Spurs from from few years ago as well. That Spurs team was incredible on offense, would the Bulls sweep them too? Do they just go about sweeping every team that has ever existed, even though they too were in close series with some squads that weren't necessarily that great.
The NBA is different now, the Bulls didn't have a big man and they didn't hit threes at a decent clip with the current three point line. They never had to guard anyone that would basically need to be picked up 30 feet from the rim, I'm asking for X's on O's on how they beat them, not the standard "will to win" stuff, do they trap Curry at halfcourt? They can't cover everyone if they do that, do they go over the screens and pray that his shooters are off?
If someone said the 82-83 Sixers could beat the Bulls this board would flip out, yet there's never a problem when it comes to the idea that teams from the past could beat teams from the present, even though teams from the present are doing things that those squads from the past didn't have to account for.
I think the Bulls would have a harder time with the Spurs than they would with the Warriors.I think they're perfectly built to handle the Warriors.
They have two, long defenders on the perimeter to throw at Steph & Klay.I'd just have MJ press Steph.
Klay's not going to do anything against Pip or Harper.
Rodman could definitely shut down Draymond.Draymond wouldn't even be able to penetrate, so there would be no rolling to the rim.
The only player the Bulls would have trouble containing 1 on 1 would be Steph.And Steph has never faced a defender like MJ.
It's like the Bulls have 3 Deion Sanders out there.They can just play man up and not have to worry about their man getting past them.It'll be a straight lock down on Klay & Green......and I like my chances with MJ on Steph.