Ron Harper: 1997 Bulls Would Sweep the Warriors

Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,775
Reputation
9,728
Daps
106,021
Reppin
NULL
Umm having a 6-7 PF with the ability to slide into the center position is playing small ball. To close out games many times Rodman played center.

A line up with

Ron Harper@ PG

MJ@ SG

Pip@ SF

Kukoc@ PF

Rodman@ C

:wow:


I don't think the Warriors are fukking with that
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,159
Daps
279,742
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
No different than Lebron and his d league squad taking the Warriors to 6 in the finals. :yeshrug:

I agree with Harper. Klay Thompson and Harrison Barnes would get exposed something serious in this series


The Cavs hit 18 threes in those two games to offset the Warriors 21, you don't beat the Warriors by trading 2s for their threes, the Cavs were in that series because they could also hit the three.

Every game the Warriors lost in the playoffs last year it was because the other team could hit enough threes to stay close, the Rockets beat them in game 4 and it took hitting 17 threes to do it :russ:
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,775
Reputation
9,728
Daps
106,021
Reppin
NULL
Where's the shooting?


The Warriors don't have to guard 2 of the 5 players in that lineup.

MJ and pip wouldn't let Curry go off.

Klay would get overwhelmed by the moment.

Draymond's offensive game is tacky.You can live with him shooting 3's.

This is one team that I think would stifle the Warriors perimeter game.
 

homiedontplaydat

Omniversal Guardian
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
11,430
Reputation
2,227
Daps
36,976
The Cavs hit 18 threes in those two games to offset the Warriors 21, you don't beat the Warriors by trading 2s for their threes, the Cavs were in that series because they could also hit the three.

Every game the Warriors lost in the playoffs last year it was because the other team could hit enough threes to stay close, the Rockets beat them in game 4 and it took hitting 17 threes to do it :russ:

All the bulls would have to deal with is curry. The other splash brother and Barnes gonna be too busy getting turned out on defense, Rodman would have Green getting thrown out of games for technicals, and the bulls had the better trump card in Jordan.

I stand by the Bulls sweep :ehh:
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,874
Reputation
12,807
Daps
202,539
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
Where's the shooting?


The Warriors don't have to guard 2 of the 5 players in that lineup.

Warriors threes and bench :wow:

in 1996 from 3
Jordan shot 43%
Pippen shot 37%
Kukoc shot 40%
Harper shot 27%
Kerr shot 51%
Buelcher shot 44%
Kerr would be coaching though so you gotta take him out :troll:
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,159
Daps
279,742
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
MJ and pip wouldn't let Curry go off.

Klay would get overwhelmed by the moment.

Draymond's offensive game is tacky.You can live with him shooting 3's.

This is one team that I think would stifle the Warriors perimeter game.


Other than saying they wouldn't let him go off, how would they accomplish it? Considering they've never seen anyone like him in their lives, how do they go about it, especially from 96-98 when they were older.

Draymond's offensive game is opportunistic and his entire purpose is to draw your big man out of the lane and force your defense to make decisions when he rolls to the rim.


Ya'll always make it sound like defenses will be everywhere at once and taking away everything, if Pippen and Jordan are focused on Curry that means someone else will be open, which is the entire point of the Warriors offense.
 

Malta

Sweetwater
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
66,896
Reputation
15,159
Daps
279,742
Reppin
Now who else wanna fukk with Hollywood Court?
in 1996 from 3
Jordan shot 43%
Pippen shot 37%
Kukoc shot 40%
Harper shot 27%
Kerr shot 51%
Buelcher shot 44%


You just going to leave out that they shot those percentages with a shorter three point line? :jbhmm:

They made a grand total of 544 that season, that would have put them at 24th in the league last year behind the sharpshooting Bucks.
 
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
34,775
Reputation
9,728
Daps
106,021
Reppin
NULL
Other than saying they wouldn't let him go off, how would they accomplish it? Considering they've never seen anyone like him in their lives, how do they go about it, especially from 96-98 when they were older.

Draymond's offensive game is opportunistic and his entire purpose is to draw your big man out of the lane and force your defense to make decisions when he rolls to the rim.


Ya'll always make it sound like defenses will be everywhere at once and taking away everything, if Pippen and Jordan are focused on Curry that means someone else will be open, which is the entire point of the Warriors offense.


But that Bulls team was exceptional.

No way was the most competitive player to ever step on a basketball court going to let Curry rain 3's.I have no doubt's that Jordan would've found an extra gear and shut Curry down.Maybe not totally, but he'd have him looking ordinary out there.

And Pip and Rodman were just to versatile on D.Like one poster already said, we're talking about maybe 3 of the top 5 defensive players in the history of the sport here....on one team.

I'm just not doubting MJ.No way, man.

If he had to hit 6 3's a game, knowing MJ, he would've done it.
 

sfgiants

BANNED
Joined
Nov 29, 2012
Messages
16,177
Reputation
4,311
Daps
63,580
Reppin
NULL
Stuttering Stanley shook cuz the Warriors lookin like they can threaten that record early on
I think the Bulls win, but sweep? GTFO
Couldn't sweep the Jazz but you're gona sweep the Warriors :heh:
 
Top