So he dropped his petition from Spotify and iHeartradio. You think this is gone be the one? I doubt it.You sure?
Rollingstone: In exchange for documents that showed iHeart did nothing wrong, Drake agreed to drop his petition. No payments were made
- Thread starter Mr 18
- Start date
There were two separate cases. The one against UMG in NY is for defamation, which is a better case. The texas one was a petition for evidence of payola. He also doubled down
There were two separate cases. The one against UMG in NY is for defamation, which is a better case. The texas one was a petition for evidence of payola. He also doubled down
History hasn’t given me a smudge of hope for Aubrey and his lawyers. Plus even if he wins, he loses. Nobody fukking with this lawsuit shyt. Majority of people don’t agree with this move.
lol
Theo Penn
on that Earl Stevens wine
Everybody saw it
I don't listen to anybody opinion honestly. People just have to read the paperwork for themselves and have their own conclusion. YouTubers just making narratives based on their bias. both sides. This beef made things real nasty as far as media
Let’s give it time. Ima see if you laughing still.
Theodoresolderbreh
No Shorts No Malarkey
There were two separate cases. The one against UMG in NY is for defamation, which is a better case. The texas one was a petition for evidence of payola. He also doubled down
Lmfao so because iheart is dealing with payola with that country shyt and the fcc it has to be going on with kendrick and umg? because that what that article says. LOL so he withdraws with iheart when he got nothing and goes to this lawsuit to say he has triple nothing? what? Am i going crazy or are all the people in thread smoking crack?
iliketurtles
Do Right And Kill Everything
Source cac woman
No, you’re not qualified to know what that paperwork means if you’re not an attorney. People keep thinking they have expertise they don’t and that’s why the world is fukked up. It’s like people trying to webMD their way to a medical degree and diagnose shyt.
Bro, all that means is the judge isn’t going to cancel the initial conference which is when they set dates for discovery. They tried to have it adjourned as a waste of time while the motion is pending and the judge said no. The judge can literally get to the conference and set a discovery schedule that would start after she rules on the motion. This means nothing. She could also tell them at the conference that she is denying the motion (that’s happened to me too).You sure?
She could also do what they requested at the conference and schedule another one after a decision has been made. You’re not doing yourself any favors. These aren’t legal wins, they’re procedural hang ups that are not consequential to the case. This is like the people who thought Jay’s lawyer pushing for an earlier motion to dismiss timeline getting denied meant he was in trouble. Judges don’t like to move off their squares. I’ve filed that same letter motion and been denied a bunch of times and then had the case dismissed. Federal courts don’t play and adhere to strict timelines.
