Rollingstone: In exchange for documents that showed iHeart did nothing wrong, Drake agreed to drop his petition. No payments were made

Germms

All Star
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
2,637
Reputation
1,256
Daps
11,189
Reppin
∞ 216 ∞
You sure?



GlNYlLrbAAAPNwF
So he dropped his petition from Spotify and iHeartradio. You think this is gone be the one? I doubt it.
 

GunRanger

Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
31,491
Reputation
4,883
Daps
104,219
So he dropped his petition from Spotify and iHeartradio. You think this is gone be the one? I doubt it.
There were two separate cases. The one against UMG in NY is for defamation, which is a better case. The texas one was a petition for evidence of payola. He also doubled down :hubie:


 

Germms

All Star
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
2,637
Reputation
1,256
Daps
11,189
Reppin
∞ 216 ∞
There were two separate cases. The one against UMG in NY is for defamation, which is a better case. The texas one was a petition for evidence of payola. He also doubled down :hubie:



History hasn’t given me a smudge of hope for Aubrey and his lawyers. Plus even if he wins, he loses. Nobody fukking with this lawsuit shyt. Majority of people don’t agree with this move.
 

NerdNash

Superstar
Joined
May 30, 2012
Messages
7,974
Reputation
525
Daps
16,666
Reppin
Delaware
I don't listen to anybody opinion honestly. People just have to read the paperwork for themselves and have their own conclusion. YouTubers just making narratives based on their bias. both sides. This beef made things real nasty as far as media
 

Theodoresolderbreh

No Shorts No Malarkey
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
8,344
Reputation
2,370
Daps
30,617
Reppin
Theodore breh and associates
There were two separate cases. The one against UMG in NY is for defamation, which is a better case. The texas one was a petition for evidence of payola. He also doubled down :hubie:



Lmfao so because iheart is dealing with payola with that country shyt and the fcc it has to be going on with kendrick and umg? because that what that article says. LOL so he withdraws with iheart when he got nothing and goes to this lawsuit to say he has triple nothing? what? Am i going crazy or are all the people in thread smoking crack?
 

Nuuko

Superstar
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
3,270
Reputation
-390
Daps
13,102
Reppin
NULL
Steven saying Drake is gonna lose a lot of money, thats good news
 

Gangstar8

Superstar
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
9,411
Reputation
-7,798
Daps
13,302
Lmfao so because iheart is dealing with payola with that country shyt and the fcc it has to be going on with kendrick and umg? because that what that article says. LOL so he withdraws with iheart when he got nothing and goes to this lawsuit to say he has triple nothing? what? Am i going crazy or are all the people in thread smoking crack?

You aren't smoking crack
You are just a dumbass like other kbots
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,025
Reputation
5,000
Daps
69,904
I don't listen to anybody opinion honestly. People just have to read the paperwork for themselves and have their own conclusion. YouTubers just making narratives based on their bias. both sides. This beef made things real nasty as far as media
No, you’re not qualified to know what that paperwork means if you’re not an attorney. People keep thinking they have expertise they don’t and that’s why the world is fukked up. It’s like people trying to webMD their way to a medical degree and diagnose shyt.
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
31,025
Reputation
5,000
Daps
69,904
You sure?



GlNYlLrbAAAPNwF
Bro, all that means is the judge isn’t going to cancel the initial conference which is when they set dates for discovery. They tried to have it adjourned as a waste of time while the motion is pending and the judge said no. The judge can literally get to the conference and set a discovery schedule that would start after she rules on the motion. This means nothing. She could also tell them at the conference that she is denying the motion (that’s happened to me too).

She could also do what they requested at the conference and schedule another one after a decision has been made. You’re not doing yourself any favors. These aren’t legal wins, they’re procedural hang ups that are not consequential to the case. This is like the people who thought Jay’s lawyer pushing for an earlier motion to dismiss timeline getting denied meant he was in trouble. Judges don’t like to move off their squares. I’ve filed that same letter motion and been denied a bunch of times and then had the case dismissed. Federal courts don’t play and adhere to strict timelines.
 
Top