Roland Martin has a strong message for you Negroes

[AngryBaby]

Complaining on the internet about it isn't doing anything to stop it. That's the definition of whining, you just complaining knowing it won't bring any results.
The word whining is exclusive to white people now?! I hope you don't truly believe the bullshyt you are pumping out.

"complaining" is if I made a statement that wasn't a direct response to you; just claiming something and seeming melancholy on the issue and falling into doomerism.

I however, merely quoted and disagreed with a framing you were making about the trump admin being essentially the same result as a kamala one. You were making false equivalences and I pointed out specifically why that isn't the case.

that is expanding upon a stance within a disagreement, by definition, there is no instance you can quote or point to, that is "complaining". Pointing out a fact, to refute your point. isn't that.

did...did you just try to reframe the conversation to "complaining"; I can't believe I even had to waste time explaining that. But your intention was to merely try and change the optics of the circumstance of this exchange. wow...pretty nefarious buddy. i can see why you don't see issue with Trump, you argue like him lol

 

[AngryBaby]

I'm not the entire left. You got thousands of other people to track down over the internet and call bad people. That will show em'. lol
Oh, and your staying here why? Not because of your ego? You want to win this argument so bad you keep declaring yourself one after every post. Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself.

Once you p*ssy out of actually engaging in direct points, that counter your arguments, and you resort to deflecting and changing the framing...that's ego. Of which I haven't done, I've addressed every point you made. you couldn't do the same....that's an L.

Also, when did this become about telling the entire left anything? weird beta deflection lol this is about your stances, i'm just telling you what it is.

yes, much of the left is cooked as well. And their self image of being any sort of "ally" is directly at odds with their actions or inaction during the election cycle. But hey, stupid gonna stupid. Alot of them thought Trump would be better for Gaza. So much for that...

 

[AnonymityX1000]

I've addressed every point you made. you couldn't do the same....that's an L.

No you haven't. What a liar.

 

[AngryBaby]

No you haven't. What a liar.

Oh which one was that then? just like you thought that I didn't address whether kamala was gonna "lose anyway"? oops.

Let's see these amazing simple little arguments you think you made that weren't addressed or pre-emptively addressed. you were already wrong about the one above, let's see you be wrong again. You ignored the specific instances of civil rights being reversed, or DEI criminal investigations, in order to keep the conversation about "corruption" instead to preserve this false equivalence you want to make.

But I feel this is a way for you....just go around in circles.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

Oh which one was that then? just like you thought that I didn't address whether kamala was gonna "lose anyway"? oops.

Let's see these amazing simple little arguments you think you made that weren't addressed or pre-emptively addressed. you were already wrong about the one above, let's see you be wrong again. You ignored the specific instances of civil rights being reversed, or DEI criminal investigations, in order to keep the conversation about "corruption" instead to preserve this false equivalence you want to make.

But I feel this is a way for you....just go around in circles.

I asked you the following and you answered none of it

Go back, read all my posts. If you see a question mark after a sentence and you didn't address it that's when. There's plenty of examples god speed. lol

 

[AngryBaby]

Go back, read all my posts. If you see a question mark after a sentence and you didn't address it that's when. There's plenty of examples god speed. lol

translation: "I don't really know but uh...gotta save face so I gotta make a vague reference towards something I can't even verbally prove" lmao

notice I gave specifics, anonymityx100 can't even do that lmao boy can't even remember the points he made that "weren't addressed" notice the difference where I remembered EXACTLY what points were ignored lol

yeah I think it's time for you to make that exit. godspeed. salvage the ego man. protect it.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

translation: "I don't really know but uh...gotta save face so I gotta make a vague reference towards something I can't even verbally prove" lmao

notice I gave specifics, anonymityx100 can't even do that lmao boy can't even remember the points he made that "weren't addressed" notice the difference where I remembered EXACTLY what points were ignored lol

yeah I think it's time for you to make that exit. godspeed. salvage the ego man. protect it.

Who are you talking to? You actually think you have an audience to your posts that gives a shyt what you're saying?! Jeez, how dilusional can you be. lol

 

[AngryBaby]

Who are you talking to? You actually think you have an audience to your posts that gives a shyt what you're saying?! Jeez, how dilusional can you be. lol

clearly to you, since...I quoted you and you responded to it lmao

and psst, we're on a 19 page thread on a public forum...so yeah...other people read what is posted. not just us two.

and...it's "delusional"

 

[AnonymityX1000]

clearly to you, since...I quoted you and you responded to it lmao

and psst, we're on a 19 page thread on a public forum...so yeah...other people read what is posted. not just us two.

and...it's "delusional"

Not clearly, you were playing to an audience.

 

[AngryBaby]

Not clearly, you were playing to an audience.

You got all that from me saying your name eh? Lol I actually meant to @ it just to be extra annoying. Even more so showing its for you.

again...were on a 19 page thread on a public forum. People have already reacted and engaged in this discourse, so...I techbically can speak pre-emptively as if others are reading it.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

You got all that from me saying your name eh? Lol I actually meant to @ it just to be extra annoying. Even more so showing its for you.

again...were on a 19 page thread on a public forum. People have already reacted and engaged in this discourse, so...I techbically can speak pre-emptively as if others are reading it.

It's 'technically' since we are now correcting each other's spelling now. lol
It's just really being pretentious and trying to get some validation but do you.

 

[omnifax]

Well maybe if he hadn't wasted everyone's time trying to make people support trash candidates like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris we wouldn't be in this position. Hell if Kamala had just separated herself from Joe Biden on gaza alone she likely could have pulled it off.

The only thing I'll agree with him on is the lack of seriousness ADOS folks have when it comes to politics. It's not an important part of our daily discussions or engagement particularly at the local level. As a group we have resigned to just voting and hoping for the best. It's not enough you have to organize around your vote and become a group much more focused on ourselves. This doesn't mean hating other groups just making ourselves a priority because we are going off a cliff.

 

[Rick Fox at UNC]

So, outside of him yelling at me, what does he propose we do?

 

[Nigerianwonder]

What happened to the 92%? I thought yall were going to sit back sip tea and watch the country burn? Unless you're suicidal that was always a silly premise.

Democrats were caught flat footed the past few weeks and unprepared to the level of which can only be attributed to them being either extremely negligent or complicit. Folks been screaming about project 2025 for the past few years and I remember asking a simple question nobody could answer. What is the democrats plan to counter project 2025?

What we see now is that they never had a plan. Just like they didnt have a plan to stop roe v wade from getting overturned when they knew before biden got into office they were going after it. Project 2025 was literally happening and progressing under bidens watch as well with no countering from dems in office. The plan was never dependent on who was in office. Trump just speeding the process up.

Perhaps if dems ran on an actual plan to combat project 2025 and showed they were going to fight they would have won.

 

[AngryBaby]

It's 'technically' since we are now correcting each other's spelling now. lol
It's just really being pretentious and trying to get some validation but do you.

Hey, You successfully managed to veer the conversation off from actually engaging with substance. Bravo.

This convo fits you though. Your speed.