Roland Martin has a strong message for you Negroes

[AnonymityX1000]

Uh...then you're an idiot.


That's like saying killing a spider and killing a hooker are "equally concerning".

See the important part you are omitting is 'by the premise you are forwarding'. I already said I don't think all corruption is equal in my initial reply to you today. Keep up dude.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

I mean it's not just me...that's the problem lol

I simply think if a numerous amount of people within your same demographic find you to be flimsy and unreasonably bad faith in your arguments; ignoring clear and concise questions, points etc, especially regarding how this admin impacts your own people...If a majority group of people are telling you a thing...like I see in this thread. then a rational person might make some sort of statistical self analysis. not you though lol

there are alot of uneducated people who didn't see Trump as any sort of threat, enough to properly take the pragmatic measures to stop an administration like that. and you simply fall into that category. You can't even develop any arguments that make any actual sense to defend your position; and ignore the racial impact. Like this:




So you're solution is...not doing anything? and how are you objectively even gauging people's "lack of tolerance for corruption"? by voting? and you're solution is...Jill Stein of all people? LMAO

see, these aren't intelligent arguments...they are bad. easy to dismantle. Hence why you puss out of engaging with the question of why are you c00ning out of the racial element of this conversation.

Eh, I'm fine with the amount of Daps and rep I get on this platform. You and Black Panther being upset at me isn't moving the needle. Sorry. lol

 

[AngryBaby]

Eh, I'm fine with the amount of Daps and rep I get on this platform. You and Black Panther being upset at me isn't moving the needle. Sorry. lol

lol now who is making highschool arguments. "I have daps!" Yes, you having 31,000 posts in a similar timespan to my 4k surely makes you look like a guy with a...life. i'm sure mathematically you'll get some sympathy daps out of that. not something to be proud of.

anyway, we're talking about your stance on this subject, in this thread, and how it's received. *in this thread* Notice how again...you p*ssied out of engaging with anything that deconstructs your actual points.

changing the subject to it being about "liking you" to create the optics that you actually have an argument lol nah, breh, engage with the points made. I don't think you can though, which is why you avoided it.

voting for Jill Stein, a Russian apologist, of all people to fight corruption is a flimsy stance. You lost by even mentioning that.

hmm, ya know, as a guy who fancies debate for sport; if you keep this going you're gonna get destroyed lol showing signs of weakness I like to see. I'll hold back though lol but might wanna make that random exit most posters that are about to take an L make.

I'm sure you'll just respond to that last statement and not engage with any actual points though, which in a way...is an exit and a L. So I'm cool with it lmao the audience see's it lmao.

 

[Black Panther]

See the important part you are omitting is 'by the premise you are forwarding'. I already said I don't think all corruption is equal in my initial reply to you today.

I omitted it because I don't believe you.

You said these things yesterday:

Didn't Wall St. Stick us all up for billions in 2008? Haven't Republicans been pushing for voter IDs and other machinations to suppress the vote? Weren't all our privacy rights compromised for the Patriot Act?
It's not exactly the same as these are different in their specifics. But yeah, it's the same in that rights are being taken away, the government is acting on their personal interests and health, wealth, education disparities are being increased.

So because it's been happening, we shouldn't support efforts to stop it or push back in any way?

Because the government gave the banks a bailout in 2008, we shouldn't keep Trump and Rethugs from giving the 1% another tax cut?

Even though voter ID laws are racist and disenfranchise Black voters (as determined by a federal judge), we shouldn't support efforts to increase voter access and turnout because Republicans won an election?

Because the Patriot Act gave the government carte blanche for massive surveillance of it's citizens, we shouldn't support net neutrality?

Yeah, we beeeeen in an oligarchy. Your democracy was bought and paid for literally decades ago. Glad you are finally noticing.

I.e. "why should we care about Elon openly attempting to direct government policy when lobbying exists?"

 

[AnonymityX1000]

lol now who is making highschool arguments. "I have daps!" Yes, you having 31,000 posts in a similar timespan to my 4k surely makes you look like a guy with a...life. i'm sure mathematically you'll get some sympathy daps out of that. not something to be proud of.

anyway, we're talking about your stance on this subject, in this thread, and how it's received. *in this thread* Notice how again...you p*ssied out of engaging with anything that deconstructs your actual points.

changing the subject to it being about "liking you" to create the optics that you actually have an argument lol nah, breh, engage with the points made. I don't think you can though, which is why you avoided it.

voting for Jill Stein, a Russian apologist, of all people to fight corruption is a flimsy stance. You lost by even mentioning that.

You asked if I voted or not. I was answering your question. I asked you if I voted for Kamala would she have won? You didn't answer. So who is really, "puzzied out on engaging"?

 

[AnonymityX1000]

I omitted it because I don't believe you.

You said these things yesterday:



So because it's been happening, we shouldn't support efforts to stop it or push back in any way?

Because the government gave the banks a bailout in 2008, we shouldn't keep Trump and Rethugs from giving the 1% another tax cut?

Even though voter ID laws are racist and disenfranchise Black voters (as determined by a federal judge), we shouldn't support efforts to increase voter access and turnout because Republicans won an election?

Because the Patriot Act gave the government carte blanche for massive surveillance of it's citizens, we shouldn't support net neutrality?

I.e. "why should we care about Elon openly attempting to direct government policy when lobbying exists?"

Do what you want man, the person I was talking to was trying to check me for not being a whiny bytch like he was being. I was pointing out I'm all out of outrage at this point in time due to decades of past corruption and oligarchy capture. I'll leave the whining to you guys in 2025. lol

 

[AngryBaby]

You asked if I voted or not. I was answering your question. I asked you if I voted for Kamala would she have won? You didn't answer. So who is really, "puzzied out on engaging"?

bro are you retarded; I just said that if the left actually voted in accordance to their 2020 numbers, she would have won. that is the objective truth statistically.

I said the choices of people like you, and the people that stayed home, or fractured the base...that are democrat or left leaning, are the very reason she lost. this is a documented reality. Trump didn't win because he had crazy numbers. or more numbers than 2020.

delicious; you're getting lazy, points are becoming terrible, easy to dismantle. showing to be the lesser debater. you should take an exit soon lol

You're staying here out of pride at this point lmao let the ego go my friend. I said that to you pre-emptively. Because I knew you were gonna get cooked and overstay your welcome.

 

[AngryBaby]

Do what you want man, the person I was talking to was trying to check me for not being a whiny bytch like he was being. I was pointing out I'm all out of outrage at this point in time due to decades of past corruption and oligarchy capture. I'll leave the whining to you guys in 2025. lol

Pointing out the logical fallacies that you couldn't address, of why this administration was important to actually properly vote against is...whining?

you also keep just calling it "corruption"; ignoring the social and civil rights elements of this entirely...interesting. Is that the part you called whining? White boy take lol

 

[Black Panther]

I was pointing out I'm all out of outrage at this point in time due to decades of past corruption and oligarchy capture.

To be a Negro in this country and to be relatively conscious is to be in a state of rage almost, almost all of the time — and in one's work.

This is one of the many reasons I have doubted your Blackness in the past. You post like a whiny privileged cac.


If you're not outraged, you're complacent.

 

[AngryBaby]

This is one of the many reasons I have doubted your Blackness in the past.

I'm not usually a conspiracy theorist on people's race...but dude is ignoring, and not reactive towards important points being made about the racial component of this. even called it whining. Keeps only trying to keep it at "corruption". even the black trump guys address race; this guy side steps it completely. Has me suspicious too tbh.

 

[Black Panther]

I'm not usually a conspiracy theorist on people's race...but dude is ignoring, and not reactive towards important points being made about the racial component of this. even called it whining. Keeps only trying to keep it at "corruption". even the black trump guys address race; this guy side steps it completely. Has me suspicious too tbh.

People who only try to see politics through the lens of class warfare do this. Tim Pool started out that way and ended up as a full-blown Trump supporter (probably shouldn't be surprised.)

Doesn't mean he's not Black, but not acknowledging the racial component is certainly strange.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

bro are you retarded; I just said that if the left actually voted in accordance to their 2020 numbers, she would have won. that is the objective truth statistically.

I said the choices of people like you, and the people that stayed home, or fractured the base...that are democrat or left leaning, are the very reason she lost. this is a documented reality. Trump didn't win because he had crazy numbers. or more numbers than 2020.

delicious; you're getting lazy, points are becoming terrible, easy to dismantle. showing to be the lesser debater. you should take an exit soon lol

You're staying here out of pride at this point lmao let the ego go my friend. I said that to you pre-emptively. Because I knew you were gonna get cooked and overstay your welcome.

I'm not the entire left. You got thousands of other people to track down over the internet and call bad people. That will show em'. lol
Oh, and your staying here why? Not because of your ego? You want to win this argument so bad you keep declaring yourself one after every post. Sounds like you are trying to convince yourself.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

Pointing out the logical fallacies that you couldn't address, of why this administration was important to actually properly vote against is...whining?

you also keep just calling it "corruption"; ignoring the social and civil rights elements of this entirely...interesting. Is that the part you called whining? White boy take lol

Complaining on the internet about it isn't doing anything to stop it. That's the definition of whining, you just complaining knowing it won't bring any results.
The word whining is exclusive to white people now?! I hope you don't truly believe the bullshyt you are pumping out.

 

[AnonymityX1000]

This is one of the many reasons I have doubted your Blackness in the past. You post like a whiny privileged cac.


If you're not outraged, you're complacent.

We know you knowing stuff is a challenge. That's why you lost that ban bet. lol

 

[Black Panther]

We know you knowing stuff is a challenge. That's why you lost that ban bet. lol

For the sake of argument, even if I didn't lose that ban bet, would my points in this thread still be valid?

Pathetically weak deflection.