Malik
Superstar
Exactly breh! That's exactly my damn point. In your opinion, we are all obviously not the same kind of black, so why do you think your standards of "blackness" and what black people should do should even apply to her?
WE ARE NOT THE SAME KIND OF BLACK IN YOUR OPINION. If we were, any "black" person would be good for the cover. Stop trying to take your benefits and leave your detriments when you say stuff like this.
If she's not your kind of ideal black, stop holding her to your ideal black standards and acting like lighter skinned people should give a fukk.
You type all this shyt, but if lighter skinned and mixed black people decided today that didn't wanna be associated with darker skinned blacks, or want their image associated with darker skinned blacks, you'd have a damn bytch fit.
SN: I honestly don't give no fukk about a darkskinned woman's self esteem just cause she dark skinned. My mama dark skinned and she damn sure ain't lookin' at no magazine cover to feel better about herself. Just cause bytches are stupid don't mean we have to adjust rationality to help them cope. FOH.
I do consider lightskinned people black. But I wouldn't put lighter women on the cover because they're over-represented in the media as is. Lightskinned women are idolized and worshiped as is. Lightskinned women have replaced Darkskinned women in television shows and movies as is. So yea....I would put darker females on the cover of a "Black Love" magazine because I would want to put a different image out there, and not add to the problem. You jumping from me saying "Lightskinned women shouldn't be idolized and worshiped" to that meaning "Lightskinned people aren't black". Its not the same thing. You can be black. But we don't have to kiss your azz.
Last edited: